Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-09 Thread Stan Johnson
On 2/9/23 2:22 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 10:39 -0700, Stan Johnson wrote: >> On 2/7/23 4:20 PM, Finn Thain wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: >>> ... >>> Preventing pointless key generation would be beneficial for all Macs, >>> Amigas,

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 10:20 +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > Preventing pointless key generation would be beneficial for all Macs, > Amigas, Ataris, emulators etc. and measuring the performance of one model > of Mac versus that of another model seems a bit irrelevant to me. Feel free to suggest a

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 10:39 -0700, Stan Johnson wrote: > On 2/7/23 4:20 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > > ... > > Preventing pointless key generation would be beneficial for all Macs, > > Amigas, Ataris, emulators etc. and measuring the performance of one

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-08 Thread Finn Thain
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > On 2/7/23 4:20 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > > ... > > Preventing pointless key generation would be beneficial for all Macs, > > Amigas, Ataris, emulators etc. and measuring the performance of one model > > of

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-08 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, On 8.2.2023 19.39, Stan Johnson wrote: The stack smashing appears to be intermittent. And it doesn't show up while booting the kernel; it only shows up while sysvinit scripts are running (I haven't tested using systemd, since that would be too painful on any 68030 slower than about 40 MHz).

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-08 Thread John Klos
If anyone knows of a 68030 emulator (maybe Basilisk?) that can boot Linux, then I might be able to use that for faster testing. I've played around with NetBSD on FS-UAE. I'd use it more, except for the fact that the emulation of the Commodore 2065 ethernet card gives very flakey networking.

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-08 Thread Stan Johnson
On 2/7/23 4:20 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > ... > Preventing pointless key generation would be beneficial for all Macs, > Amigas, Ataris, emulators etc. and measuring the performance of one model > of Mac versus that of another model seems a bit irrelevant

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-08 Thread Stan Johnson
On 2/7/23 3:14 PM, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:41:52PM -0700, Stan Johnson wrote: >> Yes, I do have the L2 cache card installed in the IIci. >> >> If you think it would be useful, I don't mind letting the SE/30 run >> overnight to see if it eventually boots. > > I don't know if

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-07 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > If you think it would be useful, I don't mind letting the SE/30 run > overnight to see if it eventually boots. > Preventing pointless key generation would be beneficial for all Macs, Amigas, Ataris, emulators etc. and measuring the performance of

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-07 Thread Brad Boyer
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:41:52PM -0700, Stan Johnson wrote: > Yes, I do have the L2 cache card installed in the IIci. > > If you think it would be useful, I don't mind letting the SE/30 run > overnight to see if it eventually boots. I don't know if it would be useful in any practical sense,

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-07 Thread Brad Boyer
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:31:17AM -0700, Stan Johnson wrote: > On 2/6/23 8:25 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > These systems are too slow for needless key generation so a bug report > > may be needed. > > > > The Mac IIci (25 MHz) is only about 50% faster that the SE/30 (16 MHz). > The Debian

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-07 Thread Stan Johnson
Hi Brad, On 2/7/23 12:28 PM, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:31:17AM -0700, Stan Johnson wrote: >> On 2/6/23 8:25 PM, Finn Thain wrote: >>> >>> These systems are too slow for needless key generation so a bug report >>> may be needed. >>> >> >> The Mac IIci (25 MHz) is only about

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-06 Thread Stan Johnson
Hi Finn, On 2/6/23 8:25 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > >>> Thanks, so the kernel does start, but hangs later. >>> Adding "initcall_debug" to the kernel command line may reveal more.. >>> ... >> >> Please see attached. >> >> ... >> >> [ 34.44] calling

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-06 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > > Thanks, so the kernel does start, but hangs later. > > Adding "initcall_debug" to the kernel command line may reveal more.. > > ... > > Please see attached. > > ... > > [ 34.44] calling key_proc_init+0x0/0x5e @ 1 > [ 34.47] initcall

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-06 Thread Stan Johnson
Hi Geert, On 2/6/23 1:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > ... > > Thanks, so the kernel does start, but hangs later. > Adding "initcall_debug" to the kernel command line may reveal more.. > ... Please see attached. thanks -Stan se-30_02062023-1.txt.xz Description: Binary data

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Stan, On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:31 PM Stan Johnson wrote: > On 2/6/23 12:52 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:42 AM Stan Johnson wrote: > >> On an SE/30 with 128 MiB memory, the latest Debian SID kernel > >> (vmlinux-6.1.0-2-m68k), using Debian SID modules, and with >

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-06 Thread Stan Johnson
Hi Geert, On 2/6/23 12:52 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Stan, > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:42 AM Stan Johnson wrote: >> On an SE/30 with 128 MiB memory, the latest Debian SID kernel >> (vmlinux-6.1.0-2-m68k), using Debian SID modules, and with >> initrd-6.1.0-2-m68k built on the SE/30,

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Stan, On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:42 AM Stan Johnson wrote: > On an SE/30 with 128 MiB memory, the latest Debian SID kernel > (vmlinux-6.1.0-2-m68k), using Debian SID modules, and with > initrd-6.1.0-2-m68k built on the SE/30, hangs after the initial > "ABCFGHIJK" (I tried it twice). If you get

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-05 Thread Stan Johnson
On 2/5/23 4:18 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 09:29 +1100, Finn Thain wrote: >> ... > >> When you need to generate a valid Debian/m68k vmlinux/initrd combination >> that is also current, then you'll need a Debian/m68k system that is >> current. The quickest way to

Re: Debian initramfs/initrd, was Re: stack smashing detected

2023-02-05 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 09:29 +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2023, Stan Johnson wrote: > > > > > > > To save time, I recommend using QEMU and an up-to-date Debian/m68k SID > > > virtual machine to produce the vmlinux and initrd files needed for use > > > with Penguin on your slower