Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-20 Thread Michael Biebl
On 17.12.2011 20:31, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: Hi guys, It seems that Mario is very busy and cannot answer. I would like to help, however everybody knows that my technical skills are limited, so I can't take a decision and test beyond the user point of view. So I propose something: -

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-19 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi again, The existing at-spi 2.0 packages need to be updated to version 2.2.3. The following is the link to the announcement. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2011-November/msg00019.html Please explain to me to enable me to understand fine: at-spi 2.0, on Debian, is only

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-18 Thread Kenny Hitt
Hi. On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:31:45PM +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: Hi guys, It seems that Mario is very busy and cannot answer. I would like to help, however everybody knows that my technical skills are limited, so I can't take a decision and test beyond the user point of view. So

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-17 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi guys, It seems that Mario is very busy and cannot answer. I would like to help, however everybody knows that my technical skills are limited, so I can't take a decision and test beyond the user point of view. So I propose something: - Could someone tell me what packages shuld be updated? - I

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-17 Thread Jason White
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL mengualjean...@free.fr wrote: - I would update the packages on experimental. Thus, even sid users will be able to work using experimental packages, without needing push to sid. Perhaps it would be better just to ask the Debian Gnome maintainers if they can do an NMU of

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-17 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi, If I understood everything (note that Debian gnome team was in Cc om my mail), gnome team doesn't want to replace Mario on atspi, as they don't know the applications and they prefer waiting for his analysis. That's why I think we should try experimental before thinking of sid, hoping he'll be

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-16 Thread Michael Biebl
On 15.12.2011 23:01, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi Mario, hi Samuel, to unblock the situation regarding GNOME 3.2, I wanted to let you know that I'm planning to NMU pyatspi tomorrow and upload the current version 2.0.2 to unstable via DELAYED/5. I've done the NMU a few moments ago. Attached is