Paul Brook wrote:
The only way to reliably tell is to try it.
Right.
Hyperthreading helps some things and hurts others.
I have an AMD64 hyperthreaded box at home and I don't see when it should
harm... :-/
The point of hyperthreading is to use unused ressources of the processor
for the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:49:54AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I never messed with an initrd. My understanding is that the purpose
of an initrd is to provide an image of a RAMdisk containing the modules
the kernel needs to access the root file system; but if the hardware and
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Paul Brook wrote:
The only way to reliably tell is to try it.
Right.
Hyperthreading helps some things and hurts others.
I have an AMD64 hyperthreaded box at home and I don't see when it should
harm... :-/
The point of hyperthreading is to use
Jo Shields wrote:
The problem with hyperthreading is that there's only a bare minimum of
distinct hardware - almost all resources are shared. notably, a pipeline
stall on one thread (where the pipelines on a p4 are ridiculously long)
will flufh the hyperthread's pipeline too.
Ok, two threads
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
The problem with hyperthreading is that there's only a bare minimum of
distinct hardware - almost all resources are shared. notably, a pipeline
stall on one thread (where the pipelines on a p4 are ridiculously long)
will flufh the hyperthread's
Dear All,
Could someone point me which kernel to use with Athlon64 X2?
Thanks in advance
-
Dmytro Kovalskyy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Dmytro Kovalskyy wrote:
Dear All,
Could someone point me which kernel to use with Athlon64 X2?
Any SMP kernel would fit.
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury
morganj 0 is false and 1 is true, correct?
alec_eso 1, morganj
morganj bastard.
-- http://bash.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
hi,
Could someone point me which kernel to use with Athlon64 X2?
my machine booted happily with 2.6.12, however there are some timer
synchronization problems with this kernel. the first version working
correcly is 2.6.14, iirc. i run vanilla 2.6.15 on my box.
regards,
--
Lubos
[EMAIL
В сообщении от Вторник 24 Январь 2006 12:11 Emmanuel Fleury написал(a):
Dmytro Kovalskyy wrote:
Dear All,
Could someone point me which kernel to use with Athlon64 X2?
Any SMP kernel would fit.
I think, not exactly
jobipok:~# dmesg|more
Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/md0 ro
Works like a charm here. I think there was several X2/SMP issues on pre
2.6.14-smp kernels
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -r
2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 35
model name
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4 or
gcc-3.3?
Are there some necessary options in menuconfig for the 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
kernel?
Ragards
Works like a charm here. I think there was several X2/SMP issues on pre
2.6.14-smp
Dmytro Kovalskyy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4 or
gcc-3.3?
Are there some necessary options in menuconfig for the 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
kernel?
2.56.15 is in SID right now...No need to compile...
X-TRaZy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dmytro Kovalskyy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4 or
gcc-3.3?
Are there some necessary options in menuconfig for the
2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp kernel?
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4 or
gcc-3.3?
Are there some necessary options in menuconfig for the 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
kernel?
2.56.15 is in SID right now...No need to compile...
the question is whether Dmytro wants to move to
В сообщении от Вторник 24 Январь 2006 13:32 X-TRaZy написал(a):
X-TRaZy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dmytro Kovalskyy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4
or gcc-3.3?
Are there some
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
my machine booted happily with 2.6.12, however there are some timer
synchronization problems with this kernel. the first version working
correcly is 2.6.14, iirc. i run vanilla 2.6.15 on my box.
There are some TSC issues being
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:46:48PM -0500, Robert Isaac wrote:
You could even save yourself some effort and install Yaird from backports.org
:)
It wasn't there when I did it. :)
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:00:19 +0100, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Besides with the price of ram, a system shouldn't normally be swapping
anyhow, so any minimal performance difference isn't worth considering.
Neither is the cost of disk space for doing raid for swap.
I completely agree with you on
I was messing with this also. I am not at home right now but if I recall
you need to do scsi emulation. The device to use then is /dev/sg0(or
something like this) Then the CD spools up and hammers a song out in
seconds versus 10s of minutes. I am by far not an expert and struggling
with
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:27:48AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'd read elsewhere that the AMD64 cdrdao was buggy, and the
patch to fix the bugs wasn't in either Sarge or Etch yet. I guess
that's out-of-date info.
It is in 'stinky-pete' archive though since the patch is trivial
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:09:39PM +0200, Dmytro Kovalskyy wrote:
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4 or
gcc-3.3?
Are there some necessary options in menuconfig for the 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
kernel?
Why not use the 2.6.15 kernel
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:12:29PM +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
the question is whether Dmytro wants to move to sid... if not, i
compiled the 2.6.15 on my dual dualcore opteron box with the standard
gcc that ships with sarge, i.e. 3.3.5. everything works like a charm. no
special options were
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:49:54AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I have a dumbass question: why is yaird necessary at all? Or more
accurately, why is an initrd necessary at all? Is it something about
2.6.x kernels? Back when I built 2.4.x kernels for my Athlon XP machine,
I follwed
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Thomas Steffen wrote:
That kind of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? The idea of HT was to
increase the utilisation of core CPU groups by having two threads
ready for dispatch. If one thread stalls, the other thread could still
dispatch operations,
Lennart Sorensen napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:09:39PM +0200, Dmytro Kovalskyy wrote:
Ok, thanks to all!
If to compile a new kernel which compiler version better to use gcc-3.4 or
gcc-3.3?
Are there some necessary options in menuconfig for the 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
kernel?
Why not
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:09:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It worked beautifully.
A day or two ago, the URL seems to have changed.
http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/amd64/
works now.
I didn't know port 81 had ever worked on that machine. It is run by one
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:21:10PM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote:
The package may have been renamed to linux-image-* instead of
kernel-image-*.
It certainly would have been. :)
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 1/24/06, Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with hyperthreading is that there's only a bare minimum of
distinct hardware - almost all resources are shared. notably, a pipeline
stall on one thread (where the pipelines on a p4 are ridiculously long)
will flufh the hyperthread's
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 04:04 am, Dmytro Kovalskyy wrote:
Dear All,
Could someone point me which kernel to use with Athlon64 X2?
Thanks in advance
-
Dmytro Kovalskyy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look at an smp kernel image, or
Jo Shields wrote:
Hyperthreading gives an illusion of responsiveness on the desktop, but
no vendor in their right minds ships servers with HT turned on.
That's funny. You should tell Sun that about their Niagara processors.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 09:52:36AM -0700, Paul Koenig wrote:
I was messing with this also. I am not at home right now but if I recall
you need to do scsi emulation. The device to use then is /dev/sg0(or
something like this) Then the CD spools up and hammers a song out in
seconds versus
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:35:21PM +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
Lennart Sorensen napsal(a):
Why not use the 2.6.15 kernel from unstable rather than bothering with
compiling your own for now?
optimization, perhaps?
What optimization?
myself, i usually compile my own kernel to include only the
Chandler Cedric
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:32:54PM -0500, Adam Skutt wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
Hyperthreading gives an illusion of responsiveness on the desktop, but
no vendor in their right minds ships servers with HT turned on.
That's funny. You should tell Sun that about their Niagara processors.
Hello all,
I want to format my FAT32 disk and re-install windows ( Windows need to
be re-installed often. :-))). Yes I need windows only for game :-
But I know that windows will erase my MBR :-.
I saw 2 solutions with knoppix live cd :
First solution
#grub
root (hd0,3) --- I have an
Am Dienstag 24 Januar 2006 21:19 schrieb Thierry LARMIER:
Hello all,
I want to format my FAT32 disk and re-install windows ( Windows need to
be re-installed often. :-))). Yes I need windows only for game :-
But I know that windows will erase my MBR :-.
I saw 2 solutions with
Thierry LARMIER wrote:
Hello all,
I want to format my FAT32 disk and re-install windows ( Windows need to
be re-installed often. :-))). Yes I need windows only for game :-
But I know that windows will erase my MBR :-.
I saw 2 solutions with knoppix live cd :
First solution
Am Dienstag 24 Januar 2006 22:22 schrieb Gian Domeni Calgeer:
Am Dienstag 24 Januar 2006 21:19 schrieb Thierry LARMIER:
Hello all,
I want to format my FAT32 disk and re-install windows ( Windows need to
be re-installed often. :-))). Yes I need windows only for game :-
But I know
Am Dienstag 24 Januar 2006 22:54 schrieb Corey Hickey:
Thierry LARMIER wrote:
Hello all,
I want to format my FAT32 disk and re-install windows ( Windows need to
be re-installed often. :-))). Yes I need windows only for game :-
But I know that windows will erase my MBR :-.
First, thanks to you for your answers.
I tried with the debian CD installer expert mode. I choose language
+keyboard. But grub is not installed at this level.
So I continue with module loading in the installation. After there is
partman. But I was scared to continue and scratch my debian
Hello all,
I have a Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000. I use the Luc Saillard's pwc
module . My webcam working fine with xawtv or camstream. But not with
Gnomemeeting. I don't see my beautiful face :-) but there are
scrumble lines that move if I move my hand in front of the webcam. So
it is a format
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
They aren't intel netburst architecture. Someone else is free to
implement hyperthreading (SMT) without a shared pipeline after all. Not
sure how Sun (or IBM for that matter) do theirs.
They have multiple cores per die with multiple SMT units per core. And
it's very
Hello all. I'm looking to build a new system for Debian Linux. I'm going with an AMD64 chip. However, does the Linux AMD 64 kernel support AMD64, AMD64 X2 Dual Core, and AMD64 FX? Do they all work with the same AMD64 build? Thanks for the help! :)
Hi
Why don't you do a boot-disk [1], or try with a flash memory [2] (I
haven't tried it) and once you have grub, you can restore your MBR from
it [3].
I hope it can help you
Albert
[1]http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#Creating-a-GRUB-boot-floppy
I just set up amd64 etch on my PC. I am running the 2.6.12-1-em64t-p4-smp
kernel image on an intel based system. I have the following kernel modules
loaded:
snd_intel8x0 40064 6
snd_ac97_codec 90308 1 snd_intel8x0
snd_pcm 102792 2 snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec
The short anwer is Yes and Opteron too, although I don't see any text
about an FX chip.
On 1/24/06, Patrick Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all. I'm looking to build a new system for Debian Linux. I'm going
with an AMD64 chip. However, does the Linux AMD 64 kernel support AMD64,
talk about your harware model (mother board) is ever a good idea...
On 1/24/06, Majors, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just set up amd64 etch on my PC. I am running the 2.6.12-1-em64t-p4-smp
kernel image on an intel based system. I have the following kernel modules
loaded:
snd_intel8x0
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Most of the current applications are designed to fit in 512Mo of RAM and
they probably don't use yet the 64bits-span memory allocation that your
processor can do. So... ;-)
2769 anthony 15 0 496m 173m 26m S 0.0 5.0 40:44.77
mozilla-thunder
6208 root 16
i was going to, and then i decided the $500 difference was
better left on my credi card ;)
Dean
Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
I mean about a debian in a FX machine...
On 1/24/06, Dean Hamstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the FX chip is the gaming model or something
its a little faster and costs a
Jack Malmostoso wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /sbin/mdadm -Q /dev/md1
Password:
/dev/md1: is an md device which is not active
/dev/md1: is too small to be an md component.
Considering that you ran mkswap on the underlying partitions it is
wholey unsurprising that you destroyed md1.
Hint:
50 matches
Mail list logo
