Dean Hamstead wrote:
thanks for that, it was hiding up in eth5 for some reason
*shrug* and dmesg didnt bother to tell me
i will have to set it to a more reasonable eth number
Dean
snip: forcedeth NIC missing
Hi Dean
This could be a udev persistent-net issue: When I upgraded my firewall
I have just completed unrestricted MP2/6-31G* energy procedure (after
DFT/M05-2X) for a 98-atoms (first row) molecule in 19 hours with four-node
amd64 Debian amd64 etch, NWChem suite. I understand (if I understand correctly)
from your email that should I have had Core 2 I would not have had the
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:29 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:16:14AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well if you need something to do floating point, then x86 isn't
generally where you want to be. And yes if performance matters gcc
is
not what you want to use
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:08 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I have just completed unrestricted MP2/6-31G* energy procedure (after
DFT/M05-2X) for a 98-atoms (first row) molecule in 19 hours with four-node
amd64 Debian amd64 etch, NWChem suite. I understand (if I understand
correctly)
from
Hi,
we have a new box here that seems a nice machine. It has:
- gigabyte ga-m61p-s3 mobo with:
nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller (rev a1)
Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2)
nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller (rev a2)
nVidia Corporation Unknown
A Dimecres 19 Setembre 2007 15:50, Daniel Tryba va escriure:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:30:43PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
[crashes]
So, my question is? How I can determinate if:
- the memory fails (memtest done, but only 2 hours ..)
- mainboard fails
- debian kernel stock
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:30:43PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
[crashes]
So, my question is? How I can determinate if:
- the memory fails (memtest done, but only 2 hours ..)
- mainboard fails
- debian kernel stock fails?
- my fingers fails and I have a misconfigured bios ...
Did
Douglas A. Tutty píše v St 19. 09. 2007 v 00:31 +0200:
Why is it that debian doesn't do pre-emption in the kernel?
I can imagine workloads (typically on servers) where preemptive
kernel is not necessary (or even can be bad for performance).
Vit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Douglas A. Tutty píe v St 19. 09. 2007 v 00:31 +0200:
Why is it that debian doesn't do pre-emption in the kernel?
I can imagine workloads (typically on servers) where preemptive
kernel is not necessary (or even can be bad for performance).
Vit
Here's some info on pre-emption and the
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dimecres 19 Setembre 2007 15:50, Daniel Tryba va escriure:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:30:43PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
[crashes]
So, my question is? How I can determinate if:
- my fingers fails and I have a misconfigured bios ...
You could
10 matches
Mail list logo