.
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo)___
(__))\
||--|| *
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
.
I care about not being shafted that way myself, and I care about other people
not being shafted in future.
--
AJS
delta echo bravo six four at earthshod dot co dot uk
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford
than Intel.
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo)___
(__))\
||--|| *
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
Just for the other side of the coin
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 08:35 -0800, Francesco Pietra wrote:
In the last few days I asked advice about upgrading from a 2-way Tyan
motherboard Thunder K8WES2895 with two series-2xx AMD dual core opteron to a
4-way motherboard. I learned from both Lennart Sorensen and Daniel Tryba that
I
can't
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:12 -0800, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Hi Len:
I agree. However, these are no standardized codes. Actually, it is a code in
development that is faced with extreme situations that could not have been in
the mind of the developer. Docking a large molecule onto a protein
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:39 -0800, Francesco Pietra wrote:
This question is related to problems in running a docking computation. With
big
cases, RAM proves insufficient, resulting in immediate segmentation fault,
so
that top cannot inform. Though, from the code it is clear that memory is
mem b/w per physical CPU
Memory performance increases with CPUs in AMD platforms, decreases in
Intel platforms.
That's the incredibly naive version, anyway.
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre
Debian. Modern meaning Nocona core
and more recent.
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo
) on older kernels (e.g. the kernel in Ubuntu 6.06), where
the RAID array is listed *last* rather than first
Which suggests it's a kernel issue
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre
core limit per machine is a problem?).
Then look at cost, choke on your coffee, and go back to buying Xeon
clusters
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre
compiler and math library -
you may find a cheaper option to improve performance than buying a new
Core2 rig is to buy Portland C (or Pathscale C), and link against the
free AMD Core Math Library instead of conventional open-source
BLAS/LAPACK routines.
--
__
/ Jo Shields
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:07 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
And in case anyone's not keeping up at the back: Pentium 4 and Core 2
have nothing whatsoever in common, other than the ability to run x86
code. Core 2 is a screamingly
. Core 2 is a screamingly fast chip, Pentium 4 wasn't
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:41 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:08:48PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
Or more? Buy an Altix! ;)
Ehm, well the Altix uses either the itanium (why would anyone want that
crap) or a dual socket core 2 based cpu. That hardly matches a 4
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 08:10 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jim Crilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tested the exact same thing again but waited 60 seconds after saving
the file, and then yanked the power out. Upon a boot up, the file was
intact and the save worked. So you still have
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 17:09 -0300, Ivan Paganini wrote:
I've installed a amd64 lenny system, and installed just afterwards the
nvidia 100 driver directly from the nvidia installer, with the
2.6.21-2-amd64 kernel. Not a single glitch, everything working fine...
and lightning fast!
It works
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 03:02 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:20:26PM -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
* Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-21 13:34:53 -0400]:
Another good test scene: Maria in the Mother Superior's office, the
Nvidia driver lets the
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 06:34:04PM -0500, helices wrote:
I am looking to add a high quality sound card to my amd64 system.
Obviously, I want it supported on in Etch.
Please, advise ...
What do you intend to use it for? What features do you want?
ie:
S/PDIF
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:57:45PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
For general ease of using legacy apps, aim for a card with hardware
mixing. Which in most cases means an Audigy of some kind. Check
http://alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Matrix:Tag-HWMIX
Don't
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 22:10 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I have an nVidia EN7300GT based card. I'm quite happy with it when I
use the nVidia driver to watch DVDs. With the nv driver the fine image
detail is less clear. I'm assuming that this is because the nv driver
isn't accessing the
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 06:59 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
* Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-20 08:48:57 +0100]:
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 22:10 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I'm asking on this list since my box is an Athlon64 running amd64 and I
don't know if, for example
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:03 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
* Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-20 12:06:05 +0100]:
In short? AMD64 gives you 2GFLOPS per core per GHz. Core2 gives double
that. It's a significantly faster floating point chip, albeit with
significantly worse memory
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 03:14 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
--- Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:01 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
May I ask whether OpenGL is now available pure 64-bit for amd64 etch
(dual-core
opterons machine where X - when needed
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:21 -0400, Tom Vier wrote:
I tried to search the archives, but i got an internal server error from
lists.debian.org.
Looks like there's no seperate smp kernel anymore. 2.6.18-4 seems to support
smp, but it doesn't recognize my dual core 175. I don't see any newer
system isn't RPM-based, then you're out of luck.
Ignore the messages if you can, bet to work on repackaging the installer
RPMs if you can't
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre
of performance?
You doubt the port? What, because nobody has more than 3GiB of RAM, or
compiled their own high-performance apps?
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre
of the 3000Mhz models do not as far as I can tell.
Look for lm in the flags section of /proc/cpuinfo - if it's there,
that means it'll run amd64 code
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre
that required manual cleaning in a text editor. Don't do it!
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo
--
__
/ Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| Systems Manager, |
\ Oxford Supercomputing Centre /
---
\ ,__,
\ (oo)___
(__))\
||--|| *
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:25 -0600, Seb wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:34:31 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
[...]
So yes a commercial driver may be the only choice, or one could go get a
cheap printer that actually works with linux and will stay working
because it
performance - meaning MPI
becomes a more interesting prospect at that point.
--Jo Shields
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 09:38 -0800, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I am trying to run on debian amd64 etch, kernel
2.6.18-3-amd64 #1 SMP, an application that was
compiled with ifort.
It has installed correctly, I believe, though when
trying to start a job, error message: not found
libimf.so. That
On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 11:56 -0600, Carlo Segre wrote:
Hi Frencesco:
If you could tell us a bit more details on the application your are
installing and where you get it, that would help. It is likely that you
are installing a program which has been compiled for Intel architecture on
your
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 09:15 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:24:23PM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I think that my /etc/X11/xorg.conf is fine,
nevertheless to be sure I sent it
What isn't working?
Your window manager is managed either by your display manager
My video board is an ATI Radeon 256MB PCI-E.
There approximately 16 different ATI Radeon graphics chipsets in use
which appear on a PCI-E bus and feature 256MiB of memory.
You need to be more precise if you want a helpful answer - especially
with the curious vesa doesn't work statement.
--Jo
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:39 +0100, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
Hi everybody,
could someone post a mirror for amd64 etch.
http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for
the system. I can't ever remember the name of the variable though.
LANG=C somecommand
--Jo Shields
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 21:25 +0100, Sythos wrote:
Il Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:26:00 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scrisse:
Hi. Have anybody heared about some mosix or open-mosix kernel for debian
amd 64? When I searched the package list on debian.org I have found only
some mosix kernel in oldstable
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 18:39 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
hi,
Do 'apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common', then
run module assistant (m-a) as already suggest on this list.
I've done it several times, and it worked.
i tried to run m-a but the compilation ended with an
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 16:46 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
You will also want to install nvidia-glx after running module assistant.
but nvidia-glx is not available in etch. i had to use unstable version
when installing amd64 etch desktop.
any hints? what am i doing wrong?
This is caused
run m-a a-i nvidia first, in
order to provide the kernel module package.
--Jo Shields
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 17:54 +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 12:08, John Hannfield wrote:
I have a dual core Opteron 265 running in a Tyan K8WE (S2877) motherboard
with
4 x 1GB RAM DDR modules. The BIOS displays the RAM as 4094 MB, but using
a fresh install of
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 18:34 +0100, Antonio Salvucci wrote:
Hi, i have a problem with my ati xpress 200M card. I installed fglrx
proprietary drivers, but 3D acceleration is no enabled. The fglrx module
works, but the opengl acceleration is powerd by glx mesa project.
This is my xorg.conf config
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:40 +, kees wrote:
Hello folks,
Although the problem I am talking about is a general debian problem/bug,
I am
sending my message to this list, as there seems to be no list adequate
for this subject and
the machine I am working on is a amd64.
The problem is the
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 12:35 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 03 November 2006 12:40, kees wrote:
Hello folks,
Although the problem I am talking about is a general debian problem/bug,
...
I tried to install the driver etc. via the *.run file downloaded from
nvidia, but this
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:42 +0100, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
dmesg | grep -i aperture
Checking aperture...
CPU 0: aperture @ 246000 size 32 MB
Aperture too small (32 MB)
How to setup Aperture?
In BIOS, video shared memory is set up to 128MB.
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel
It's a
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 11:17 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:05:16PM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
gcj -v --main=Hello -o Hello.exe Hello.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/j$ ./Hello.exe
bash: ./Hello.exe: Permission denied
.exe? Do you think this is windows? :)
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 02:45 -0700, C_Wakefield wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 01:05, you wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 09:08, C_Wakefield wrote:
Greetings.
Still trying to understand why I can't seem to run any kernels I compile.
Been trying since 2.6.17 on my new amd64-X2
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 21:15 -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
andy:/etc/apt# apt-get install nvidia-graphics-drivers
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package nvidia-graphics-drivers
There's no such (binary) package.
nvidia-kernel-common: Init
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 13:07 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi folks,
I am lookingh for a special program called shkeys. Maybe it is too old, as
it is gone. This little fine program did tjhings like this:
- You did press a key, then it read out your scancode.
- then it asked you, which
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 12:19 -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Henry Hollenberg wrote:
I wrote:
OK, I added some unstable lines to my sources.list and ran apt-get
update:
deb http://cudlug.cudenver.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://cudlug.cudenver.edu/debian/
by a silly nvidia-kernel-source bug that has been
resolutely ignored for over a year.
cat /proc/version and ensure you have the correct version of GCC
installed - e.g. if your kernel was compiled with GCC 4.0, ensure you
have gcc-4.0
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=319544
--Jo
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 21:34 -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
It looks like this kernel got installed on my system not
to long ago but I can't seem to figure out where it came
from. Can't find it in the debian packages by searching
the debian web site. Any idea where it comes from?
It seems
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 17:46 +0200, Bonnel Christophe wrote:
function. So it seems that the memory motherboard controller change
bytes randomly.
AMD64 doesn't have a motherboard-based memory controller. The memory
controller is built into the CPU
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 18:13 -0500, Seb wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:19:06 +0100,
Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The nvidia-installer indiscriminately overwrites key files in /usr,
leading to major system death in the event of upgraded X-related
packages.
The Debian
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 09:56 -0500, Seb wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:02:34 +0530,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alok G. Singh) wrote:
[...]
There is a beta 9625 driver out which fixes the problem on my
6200TC. The debs are in experimental. You'll also need nvidia-glx.
Thanks, yes, I had an
Russ Cook wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi Russ,
sry, my late answer, I did somehow miss your mail.
Well, if nv crashes and nvidia without Load GLX-Option, then there
might be another non nvidia dependent problem.
What does it show, if you disable kdm and start manually X with the
Stefano Melchior wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:54:49AM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Dear all,
I am going to plan a help on your amd64, once I download and installed it
on my pc.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-uml-devel/2006-September/000297.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:15:01PM -0700, chindea mihai wrote:
Hy,
I tried to install the AMD64 OS version, on my PC, the boot worked fine, but
when installer should Detect and Mount the cdrom, failed to detect any. I
was wondering if there is any problem with
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
I have got the fglrx-driver installed, but, because of some reason, it is
still rather slow. Although all 3D-functions are o.k., and fgl_glxgears is
running, the kernel-module and the driver are loaded correctly it is still
slow. Please look at the result
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
I've a Radeon 9250
It is supported with free drivers and fglrx
I tried both
With fglrx if I enable the Composite extension, I've a message as it
disable dri. Without dri, it is slow, with dri I've slightly better
performances than with free driver... but I miss
Pepo wrote:
Hi friends.
I am trying to install NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-1.0-8774-pkg2.run on my new amd64
system but it didn't find kernel source. How do I can install this driver?
My kernel is 2.6.17-2 and Ive installed linux-headers-2.6.17-2
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-amd64 linux-source-2.6.17.
A J Stiles wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:00, João Marcelo wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I'm trying to install Intel Fortran Compiler 9.1.036 on my Debian AMD64
Opteron Box. Unfortunely, i can't use gnu fortran to compile the
application i want (http://www.cpmd.org/), because it needs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. You wrote that you have no problems with your MB with nForce3.
I have 2 questions.
I have also a MB with nForce3 and have some problems with the intel8x0
sound driver. (My MB is AsRock K8Upgrade-NF3).
My chipset's full name is nForce 3 250. The snd_intel8x0 does not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Użytkownik Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. You wrote that you have no problems with your MB with nForce3.
I have 2 questions.
I have also a MB with nForce3 and have some problems with the intel8x0
sound driver. (My MB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Użytkownik Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
So check to see what drivers are actually being used, how they're
configured - and especially whether a daemon like aRts or ESD is getting
involved.
snd-intel8x0 cannot will not do mixing in the absence of a sound
Fielder George Dowding wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
A J Stiles wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:00, João Marcelo wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I'm trying to install Intel Fortran Compiler 9.1.036 on my Debian AMD64
Opteron Box. Unfortunely, i can't use gnu fortran to compile
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Dear maintainers and users,
there is a little thing I think should be discussed.
Whenever essentiell packages (especially the kernel) is released with a new
version, there is no possibilty fall back to the old one, if things crash.
For example, some time ago there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Slightly off topic but I'm soon going to be making a new computer (my
first in 12 years) and will be using AMD with Debian.
The standard board/power/box form-factor has been ATX for a while. Does
anyone see anything else on the horizon? I plan to buy a good case and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 01:22:00AM -0500, Marc D.M. wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 19:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:11:52PM -0500, Marc D.M. wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 20:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Erik Mouw wrote:
I'm not sure what kind of device a USB UPS should use.
Believe it or not...
They're detected as USB joysticks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jo Shields wrote:
Erik Mouw wrote:
I'm not sure what kind of device a USB UPS should use.
Believe it or not...
They're detected as USB joysticks.
Aha, some dmesgage:
hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Joystick [American Power Conversion Smart-UPS
2200 RM FW :665.5.I USB FW:2.4] on usb3:2.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm starting to design my next computer before my current 486/P-II pair
finally die.
Any computer will do what I need 95 % of the time. Here's what I would
like to do that I can't do now:
scan, retouch, and store pictures from a digital camera
Craig Hagerman wrote:
On 8/30/06, Michael Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can mount and read data DVD-Rs but not video DVD then you
might not have UDF support in your kernel. Either that or your drive
is toast.
I compiled the kernel about 6 months ago. It had all the necessary
Adam D wrote:
Daniel Foote wrote:
Ever since I have built my first x86 box (AMD64) I have not been able
to get my initial font size down from the about 1 size. I have
included in my grub the following line
..root=/dev/hda1 ro video=nvidiafb:vmode:22 quiet splash
Using
Jo Shields wrote:
Adam D wrote:
Daniel Foote wrote:
Ever since I have built my first x86 box (AMD64) I have not been able
to get my initial font size down from the about 1 size. I have
included in my grub the following line
..root=/dev/hda1 ro video=nvidiafb:vmode:22 quiet splash
Using
A.E.Lawrence wrote:
Nobody has mentioned /etc/inittab in this thread so far.
ISTR that I just had to assign a run level to include kde/gdm/whatever.
Runlevel 2 is usually kept for text alone which is very useful indeed
when your GUI goes belly up.
ael
That's a redhatism. Debian runs at
Viktor Tsyrennikov wrote:
Hi, does Debian Etch for AMD 64 comes with graphical desktop KDe or
Gnome? I installed Etch yesterday but only got command line even thought
I asked to install Desktop task.
Thanks,
Victor
Debian Etch for AMD64 has practically all the same packages available to
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
this time I am looking for a way to find out a problem and to understand, how
things are working.
I have a 64-Bit notebook with installed ia32-libs. My graphic-card is a X700
made by ATI (yes, ATI sux !) and Xorg7.
All 3D-acceleration functions are
P|pex wrote:
Hi
which are the requirements for quake4?
I have: amd64 3200, 1 GB Ram and GeForce 5600 w 128MB
could I play quake4?
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
From
Jean-Luc Coulon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:22:32AM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:20:03 +0200, Andrew Robinson wrote:
Any hope of running flash on amd64 without chroot jailing firefox to
32bit mode?
If you talk about the macromedia plugin, you need
Sander Smeenk wrote:
Quoting Peter Stoehr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
But, whenever I make apt-get update apt-get upgrade, apt want to
upgrade Postfix and Vnstat again and again.
Did I something wrong when building the packages?
I have the exact same behaviour on one of my hosts with the
Paul Patrick Carpio Prantilla wrote:
Hello,
I've been stuck at this for some time now. From my x86_64 kernel, I'm
trying to install a 32-bit chroot jail under /var/chroot/sid-ia32/. I've
already used debootsrap to create a 32-bit sid environment under for
that directory, and basically followed
Paul Patrick Carpio Prantilla wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
Where did your kernel come from?
Hello Jo,
Sorry, I should've mentioned this earlier. I compiled my own 2.6.17.7
kernel:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a
Linux Terrabreak 2.6.17.7terrabreak-1 #3 PREEMPT Sun Aug 6 12:58:58 PHT
Jesper Nyholm Jensen wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory on my amd64 system,
as I had it running on my 32-bit debian before I upgraded to amd64.
Is it at all possible?
Some words about my setup:
o HW:
- AMD64 3200+,
- ATI X800 Pro gfx card.
o SW:
-
Jo Shields wrote:
Jesper Nyholm Jensen wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory on my amd64 system,
as I had it running on my 32-bit debian before I upgraded to amd64.
Is it at all possible?
Some words about my setup:
o HW: - AMD64 3200+,
- ATI X800 Pro gfx card
Jesper Nyholm Jensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:33:15AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
Jesper Nyholm Jensen wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory on my amd64 system,
as I had it running on my 32-bit debian before I upgraded to amd64
Harm Behrens wrote:
Just upgrade your kernel to 2.6.15 or more.
there is no kernel 2.6.15 in the amd64-sarge repositery! And as this is
an production-server I don't like to compile myself!
2.6.16 have in backports and testing.
I couldn't find testing at:
deb
Bill Ranck wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:58 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:02:41AM -0400, Bill Ranck wrote:
I am still trying to get a 64bit smp kernel working on my Dell
system. I have installed and successfully run 2.6.12-1-amd64-generic.
Joey Hess wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
I'm not actually sure what the correct format is for Archive-architecture
when something's got all supported arches
The best thing to do there is to list all the arches.
Done.
and I'm not sure what to do about the hosts I
couldn't contact
Joey Hess wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
Done. Mirrors I couldn't update automatically are detailed in my earlier
message (the 11 I couldn't contact, plus 65 that didn't provide a
correct directory listing for dists/sid/main/).
Thanks, applied.
I hope you can do this again from time
Joey Hess wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
Would it be useful to refine the rather rushed tools used to create the
diff, removing any manual steps from Mirrors.masterlist to .diff?
Yes.
Okay then. Attached is the new, improved Masterlister program. It should
just compile with mcs
Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone know why grub has been removed from unstable and lilo brought
back?
I upgraded a test install from testing to unstable two days back and found
that grub gets removed; lilo gets installed but no lilo-conf is generated.
Joey Hess wrote:
A quick look at what Mirrors.masterlist says about mirrors carrying
amd64 finds a lot of probably wrong information:
* 154 mirrors listed as mirroring !amd64, but having all other arches. This is
probably wrong for most of them ... it's definitly wrong for the couple I
Jo Shields wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
A quick look at what Mirrors.masterlist says about mirrors carrying
amd64 finds a lot of probably wrong information:
* 154 mirrors listed as mirroring !amd64, but having all other
arches. This is
probably wrong for most of them ... it's definitly wrong
Pipex wrote:
hi
from the last update the script to run ooo don't run
I copy it from
https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html
and the error occurs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin $ oowriter
E: Only one command may be specified
I: Run dchroot --help to list usage
Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 02:02:32PM +1000 Dean Hamstead said:
On Sun, August 6, 2006 1:27 pm, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been running an AMD64-3000+ with a generic kernel for
Alexander Meis wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to get an dell 1950 (Intel Xeon Woodcrest Dual-Core)
running with debian etch amd64 or are there any problems with hardware
support or something?
Thanks
Alex
There should be no more problems than with a Dempsey-based system, as
they both share the
Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 12:37 am, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bharath Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had recently posted in the group for suggestions on the best possible
setup for a dual opteron compile/head node for our cluster. The solution
for 32bit support
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
