Justin C wrote:
I've been using the unofficial back-port of amd64 Sarge (as I guess a
lot of people here were). This is a production server and work relies on
it, so I've been a little bit hesitant about upgrading from an
unsupported version to an official version, just in case.
I've not read
Florian Philipp wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2007 23:11 schrieb R. Ramesh:
Hi,
I thought testing is named etch. But when I go to debian installer
page for netinst image for amd64 version, I get an iso file that is
named xxx-testing-xxx.iso. However the title on the page says it is Sid!
I
A J Stiles wrote:
On Monday 19 February 2007 00:01, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
Hey all,
I have an old problem that I now wish to fix since I have just upgraded
my file server. I can boot the server from a floppy but when I try to
boot directly from the Hard Drive all I get is 01 01 01 01 ...
Try changing the driver in xorg.conf to 'vesa'. This will be much
slower than the binary Nvidia drivers, but if it works, youve found
your problem.
Thanks Matt. I have changed the driver to Vesa, and so far I can't make
it crash. I am now upgrading from stable to
Albert Dengg wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:58:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
U?ytkownik Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa?:
Openoffice. I'm tempted to try out the 64-bit build for the latter... anyone
here with experience on
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:36:58AM +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Is the AMD64 branch of Debian compromised as well by the problem on
gluck.debian.org ?
For testing and unstable, no more and no less than any other
architecture. The
Michal Schmidt wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all, I have a slight problem, but cannot find out the bad
package. It could be the kernel, too.
Description:
I am running KDE and use XMMS to listen to a tune. At the same time,
I am running kopete. Whenever there is an event,
kopete wants
Adam Skutt wrote:
Christian Hammers wrote:
Normal servers have most of their databases
and web content in RAM anyway as RAM is cheap nowadays
2TB of RAM isn't cheap nor is the hardware to address it.
Hell, 32GB of RAM isn't cheap nor is the hardware to address it.
Normal for a database
Francesco Pietra wrote:
Forgot to say:
$ uname -a
Linux deb64 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp #2 date
mpqc 2.3.0-1, running on amd64 etch debian, sees only one processor, while
there are two.
I posed the question also to the mpqc list but, in the meantime, I wonder
wether there is
Dirk Bonenkamp - Bean IT wrote:
Hi Steffen,
Thanks for your reply. Only I'm not sure what to do now... I've
chrooted to /target and tried to install grub again, still the same
error. The mtab and device.map look correct to me.
Could you give me another hint?
Thanks!
Dirk
Francesco Pietra wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:55, Matthew Robinson wrote:
Francesco Pietra wrote:
Forgot to say:
$ uname -a
Linux deb64 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp #2 date
mpqc 2.3.0-1, running on amd64 etch debian, sees only one processor,
while
Francesco Pietra wrote:
After learning from you how to inquiry the cpu, and reading better the mpqc
manual, the command
mpqc -messagegrp ShmMessageGrp:(n = 4) filename.inp | tee filename.out
puts all four processors at work and the acceleration with respect to using
only one cpu is really
Christopher Browne wrote:
On 6/16/06, Hemlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Seeking some advice on which filesystem to use.
I've been primarlity an ext3 user, because thats all I've really
ever known of, but would consider trying something else.
Plus, never used anything other than 32bit
Francesco Pietra wrote:
Hi Joe:
Thank you. Because gcc is called by $make, I tried to install gcc:
#apt-get install gcc
gcc: Depends: gcc-4.0 (=4.0.2-5) but is not installable
E: Broken packages.
francesco pietra
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 17:45, Jo Shields wrote:
Francesco Pietra
David Haworth wrote:
Hi Siju,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 06:02:06PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to net install sarge amd64 port on an amd64 athlon
computer with 120GB Seagate Baracuda 7200.7 SATA Hard Disk.
The mother board is
to go especially when
considerating future updates?
We use a duel Xeon server for fone-me.com, running Debian Sarge - its
very stable and fully supported by the debian security team.
--
Matthew Robinson
www.fone-me.com
free phone sex for all new members
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
' for more information.
panoramix:/home/jkr/MP3#
chown -R jkr:jkr ./*
(user and group are seperated by a colon, not a dot)
--
Matthew Robinson
www.fone-me.com
free phone sex for all new members
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
my MP3's are
stored.
Is anyone experiencing the same kind of problem? Does anyone know
what I can do to diagnose the botleneck? Or (best of all!) has a
sollution?
Use hdparm -t to find out how fast you can read (possibly write, i
cant remember) from your disks
--
Matthew Robinson
www.fone
options in grub. Infact, its possible to set a fallback kernel in
grub, to do remote kernel upgrades, set k8 as default, 486 as
fallback.
--
Matthew Robinson
www.fone-me.com
free phone sex for all new members
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 12:12, thomasl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:28:46AM +, Matthew Robinson wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 11:25, thomasl wrote:
I think I go back to 486 kernel again. It is very nice to be
able to move the boot disk to whatever other computer
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 17:54, Rob van Kraanen wrote:
Are they safe enough to rely on for a webserver?
Or should we run Stable 32bits until AMD64 gets official?
It is planned for december, if i'm not wrong.
Is it doable or will there be delay?
I'm doing fine running AMD64 on a webserver.
i'm currently running AMD64 Stable, and i'm a little worried that
there haven't been any updates (sudo apt-get update ; sudo apt-get
dist-upgrade) since just after i first installed.
here's my sources.list
#deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable
On Thursday 05 January 2006 13:01, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (05/01/06 10:27), Matthew Robinson wrote:
i'm currently running AMD64 Stable, and i'm a little worried that
there haven't been any updates (sudo apt-get update ; sudo
apt-get dist-upgrade) since just after i first installed
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 18:44, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
This list rocks! Thank you all for the ideas and suggestions. I
will reinstall tonight and try moving the CD to a master channel
and try changing the BOIS settings and see if any of these help.
I'll report back with my findings.
no
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 02:18, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Dean Hamstead wrote:
dont know about that.
but the ppc may lend itself more to stability given that the g3 isnt
backward compatible.
errrm, what? AFAIK, it's compatible with earlier PPC chips like the 60x
series.
I was
Basic rules of life and the internet:
If you're offered something for nothing, there is probably a catch
If you respond to such emails, you will get many more
Unscrupulous people use such ideas to rip you off
Regards
Clive
i'm guessing you just responded to a email harvester for spam.
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge
on it.
we're running a production server on it. not had much testing yet, i'l know
within a month if its up to it :). its supported by the debian security team
though.
simply edit the sources file to return back to the Debian fold?
You are assuming wrong.
You will run into several problems with incompatibilities between
ubuntu and Debian.
Pity. Then, can you advise how to do that? TIA,
i'd say you should backup /home and install debian proper
28 matches
Mail list logo
