On Friday 27 Nov 2009, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Debian folks,
I use Open Office. It works OK for me most of the time. It can save files
as Microsoft Word documents. I work with people who use MSWindows software
all the time such as MSWord etc. I want to send an encrypted or password
But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function
on it like there is in MSWord but there is a password protection option
when you save a file in it. If you look on google for Openoffice stuff
on encryption on there it all reads like a chapter from Finnegan's Wake
by James Joyce
the user at the other end decrypts it I don't know
But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function
on it like there is in MSWord but there is a password protection option
when you save a file in it. If you look on google for Openoffice stuff
on encryption
processor document in MSWord apparently according them
you just click on some menu item with encypt on it and it encrypts the
document for you. Whether it attaches a password to it as well or how the
user at the other end decrypts it I don't know
But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like
Hello,
I have Lenny with the 2.6.23-8 kernel at home and have OpenOffice 2.2.1
installed on my system.
Today, I had to go home earlier than expected and so, I took some work
with me. I am working on a database under OObase at my work and I
thought I just have to send it to my home, open
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
When I ssh into this box, the
helices:
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
Did you check /var/log/syslog and (IIRC) /var/log/xorg.0.log?
Another thing that comes to my mind: OOo has an
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no
* Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:17:30+0100] scribed:
helices:
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
Did you check /var/log/syslog
Around
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100] scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.
Sometimes, when opening
helices:
* Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:17:30+0100] scribed:
helices:
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-fkeys; nothing.
Did you check /var/log/syslog
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100] scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
I
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:20:23:52+0100] scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:20:23:52+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
scribed:
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
*
On Mon, 2007-11-12 10:04:54 -0600, helices [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :
However, it is intermittent.
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 01:02:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi Tomek
packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
some unwanted stuff on my server.
deb
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi
Please try to do
dpkg -i (both packages)
That should fix it. I used dselect and I guess that saved me the problem. And
please post it to the list if it works.
/Gudjon
Running
dpkg -i (both packages)
installed the packages w/o
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson píše v Čt 11. 01. 2007 v 19:14 +0100:
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It
compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my
server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
sid.
Then I don't understand. On the following page
http
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It
compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my
server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff
Hi Tomek
packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
some unwanted stuff on my server.
deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
/Gudjon
Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components from the link above and found
out that there is a problem
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Hi Tomek
packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
some unwanted stuff on my server.
deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
/Gudjon
Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components
Hi
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It
compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my
server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff
on my server.
deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:14, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
Hi
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64?
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
sid
Hi
Thanks for the answer.
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
amd64?
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
sid.
Then I don't understand
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:52, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
Hi
Thanks for the answer.
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
amd64?
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:52, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
Hi
Thanks for the answer.
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
amd64?
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
(unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and openoffice
for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two figure, a little
bit of text and an excel table
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 6:00 pm, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
(unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and
openoffice for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two
figure
On Thursday 05 October 2006 21:16, Scott Thomas wrote:
I've tried installing via apt-get, but get a problem with required python
version being higher than allowed by my hplj printer driver or by python-qt3
(both require python 2.4 but openoffice.org causes installation of python
2.4.3-11.
On Thursday 05 October 2006 5:29 pm, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
I don't know about your hplj printer drivers, but I have a python-qt3 from
testing here that seem be content with the current python 2.4.x.
Depend says: 2.5 and = 2.3
Thanks - that got me thinking that perhaps just an upgrade of
Hi
The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
(unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and openoffice
for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two figure, a little
bit of text and an excel table is missing but the rest
--- Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha
scritto:
P|pex wrote:
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't
run...
is't bug ?
I guess more details would be welcome. :)
When I run oowriter the first time the following error
occurs
/home/gianluca/-writer doesn't exist
I close the
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 21:56 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Your'e right. I meant if it is an official 64bit release from Sun
Microsystems.
Is not. SUn apparently doesn't care.
If not then what is the chance that the bugfixes that make this release usable
on 64bit systems will be
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto
spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
http://mail.yahoo.it
--
To
P|pex wrote:
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
I guess more details would be welcome. :)
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax: +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 10:27, P|pex wrote:
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
What do you get if you run it from an xterm or so?
It works fine on my box...
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the community?
Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the
community?
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessubword=1version=unstablerelease=all
Regards
--
Emmanuel
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessubword=1version=unstablerelease=all
I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I
to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine
...
Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)
Regards
Last week, I installed openoffice with no problem No
but I can tell you how to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)
Definitely native 64bits:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD
x86-64
Użytkownik Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/...
I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi again
An hour after my emailing I found out that openoffice for amd64 had been
accepted into the unstable repository. You can read about it on
http://openoffice.debian.net/
so I removed my packages immediately.
This is really a great news ! :)
Regards
Hi
I have compiled openoffice 2.0.4 rc2 and it can be found on my server
deb http://mve035.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/amd64/ ./
Has anyone tried kdenlive on amd64. Shall I ask Marillat to add amd64 to the
list of supported distributions? (don't know if he will) The
option motion_est must
Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
Hi,
there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice
according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official
packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this
list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite
On Thursday 21 September 2006 17:41, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
Hi,
there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice
according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official
packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were
Hi,there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite a lot. In fact, I have a bug
to the build directory: cd openoffice-*
3) Build the package (this might take quite a while):
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
Just a note to say that I think it's the same 'apt-get -b source -t
experimental openoffice.org' and it makes it easier (1 step instead of
those 3) ;)
Rafael Rodríguez
Andrew Robinson wrote:
Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the Andale
Mono is now available, but that didn't help
What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
contant (in oocalc, the fonts in the cells are fine). It is only the
windowing fonts (menu
wrote:
I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).
I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 08/24/2006 09:20 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the Andale
Mono is now available, but that didn't help
What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
contant
Andrew Robinson wrote:
I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).
I'm not sure if this is a dpi
I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).
I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font or resolution
Hi all,
OpenOffice is still quite far from being usable for amd64 architecture.
I would like to share what I know about this package and try to make it
easier for people to contribute to the amd64 port (bug reports, patches,
and so on).
First of all, few links about OpenOffice:
http
Hi
Edit openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
build_amd64???=n that should be y
I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.
Hope it helps
Gudjon
Þann Mánudagur 24. júlí 2006 23:13 skrifaði Emmanuel Fleury:
Hi,
A J Stiles wrote:
I do not
- and that package seems to work very well.
Well, I did experience problems on a sarge box, related to java (on which
openoffice heavily relies). The problem persisted with the java runtime
environments from sun, ibm, blackdown, and apparently was simply due to java
triggering a bug in the libfreetype
it works:
1) Get the source from the Debian repository
apt-get source openoffice.org
2) Get the package needed to compile this (as root)
su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org'
3) Move to the build directory
cd openoffice-*
4) Ask to build the amd64 arch packages
In debian/rules change
Hi,
A J Stiles wrote:
I do not *want* pre-built .debs. What I specifically want is to compile the
whole thing from source on my own machine.
Do the following:
1) Get the sources:
apt-get source openoffice.org
2) Get the packages needed to compile it:
su -c 'apt-get
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:57:07PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no
On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:39, sigi wrote:
Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?
I'm running 64-bit Sid.
Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to
the built debs... ;)
Download them, install them, and enjoy.
I do not *want*
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:40:56AM +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:39, sigi wrote:
Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?
I'm running 64-bit Sid.
Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to
the built debs...
Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been quite
pleased with it. There's a working AMD64 port here:
http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.3/amd64/
That's the 2.0.3-1 version, released 2006-07-01, right?
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been quite
pleased with it. There's a working AMD64 port here:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no problem.
Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt nor
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been
quite
pleased with it. There's a working AMD64 port here:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Adam Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and
had
only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with
Hi
Go to http://openoffice.debian.net/ and there you will find all
information but I recommend setting up a chroot for openoffice. I have both
chroot and amd64 version of openoffice and the 64 bit crashes sometimes when
opening doc files. But version 2.0.3 is better than 2.0.2.
/Gudjon
want.
OpenOffice.org is now already installed in the debian-package, so, the
only
thing you need to do is just type openoffice into a shell
or
click on the icons at your WindowManager.
Thierry
Þann Fimmtudagur 20. júlí 2006 23:15 skrifaði sigi:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Adam Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and
had
only very few
crashes. OOo
2006/6/20, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
thomas parquier wrote:
I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted
files.
I get this message :
input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
(translated from french :)
Which version
Hi,
I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted files.
I get this message :
input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
(translated from french :)
Server is actualy mounted in /chroot/mnt (automounted), I put a symlink in /.
BTW, I
Hi,
thomas parquier wrote:
I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted
files.
I get this message :
input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
(translated from french :)
Which version exactly?
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
everybody,
I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home
then I put
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:08:24PM +0200, thomas parquier wrote:
Ok, I've just changed the classic mount to a bind-mount, for the home
partition.
But there's still the error a mentioned. Regarding the twice
auto-mounted remote shares, I believe that if you're right about twice
mounted
thomas parquier wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var
Hello everybody,
I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/home
Hi,
Rafael Rodr?guez wrote:
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm
This does not mean that porting OpenOffice.org to x86-64 is over[...]
[...] Of course, no-one says how much it will work for you ;-)
Still looks as a working OOo is
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my chroot. Here is the
output :
dchroot -c ia32 -d -q oowriter
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 7: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 9: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 11: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: oowriter
Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade
to login_4.0.15-1
(http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
Have a nice day :)
Sylvain Archenault wrote:
Hello,
Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my
On (03/04/06 16:50), Sylvain Archenault wrote:
Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade
to login_4.0.15-1
(http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
Have a nice day :)
Thanks Sylvain
I was bitten by
it has the same effect, but...)
find $(PKGDIR)-$$i -type f -name *.1 | xargs gzip -9; \
---
find $(PKGDIR)-$$i -type f -name *.1 | xargs gzip -9 -f; \
What for?
copy some file
cp debian/catalog.xml
debian/openoffice.org-common/usr/lib/openoffice/share/dtd
Hi all,
I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_%28AMD64%2C_EM64T%29
Regards
Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
Hi all,
I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_
Hi,
Mickael Marchand wrote:
Emmanuel Fleury a ?crit :
Hi all,
I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
http
Rene Engelhard wrote:
FWIW, I did build 2.0.2-1 for amd64 with gcj 4.0. It still is broken as
known and this will not change as fast as many people assume. The stuff
get SLOWLY forward, though.
(http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.2/experimental, _all
ones in ..)
We
Hi together,
I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./
Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation.
All other files (e.g. .doc
files) open without problems. I even can
create .odt files.
Is there w workaround for this?
this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.
I will try to build new packages soon based on the recent
On Monday 06 Mar 2006 09:18, Tobias Krais wrote:
Hi together,
I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./
Do you have a link to a corresponding deb-src line, or at least the .diff
file?
--
AJS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Adam,
I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./
Do you have a link to a corresponding deb-src line, or at least the .diff
file?
no. I found this deb with google, but without any deb-src.
But maybe this helps:
with your Installation.
All other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can
create .odt files.
Is there w workaround for this?
Greetings, Tobias
this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice
reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.
I will try to build new packages soon based on the recent new upload.
There are some problems due to the gcj compiler (better go for 4.1 to
solve this issue).
I think I used the experimental gcj 4.1 to build the previous packages
(not sure, I did
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) --
http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
Ooops. Old version, sorry --
http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.5.0.tar.gz
But,
Le Montag 6 März 2006 15:58, Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) --
http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
Ooops. Old version, sorry --
Hi Klaus,
Is this possible for Sarge or only for Sid? I suppose only for Sid because:
I had to use experimental some days ago.
Greetings, Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
