You create the partitions in the installer, setting the partition use to
'raid'. You then select configure raid, and setup all your raid devices.
Then when you return to the partition tool you will see the new raid
md devices, which you then set to 'use as LVM volume', then you go to
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:02:31AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
To my dismay, I tried (repeatedly) unsuccessfully to implement the
scheme
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:02:31AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
To my dismay, I tried (repeatedly) unsuccessfully to implement the
scheme below on old Tyan S2895 with two dual-opteron and two new
Maxtor 250GB, before moving to the new machine. With the recent amd
installer, I tried to set up (manually) the two partitions on both
disks to set up raid1.
First,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
To my dismay, I tried (repeatedly) unsuccessfully to implement the
scheme below on old Tyan S2895 with two dual-opteron and two new
Maxtor 250GB, before moving to the new machine. With the recent amd
installer, I tried to set up
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:02:31AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
To my dismay, I tried (repeatedly) unsuccessfully to implement the
scheme below on old Tyan S2895 with two
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:59:50PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I understand that the double recommendation is fine. Though, I am
pressed by answering the referees about a submitted paper as they
requested additional computation. That
On 03/03/2009 02:53 AM, Francesco Pietra wrote:
lupus in fabula as a follow up of my short intervention on raid1 with
my machine to the thread Debian on big systems.
System: supermicro H8QC8 m.board, two WD Raptor SATA 150GB, Debian
amd64 lenny, raid1
While running an electronic molecular
Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com writes:
The important bit is:
Disk failure on sda1, disabling device
So one of your disks failed. The kernel marked it as such and
continious on the other disk alone. This is invisible to the
application (apart from the short hickup) and no data is
: Re: raid1 issue, somewhat related to recent debian on big machines
To: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 03/03/2009 02:53 AM, Francesco Pietra wrote:
lupus in fabula as a follow up of my short intervention on raid1
==
===
-- Forwarded message --
From: Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: raid1 issue, somewhat related to recent debian on big machines
To: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Ron
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com writes:
[snip]
That is a lot of raids. Have you ever thought about using LVM? The
different raid1 will mess up each others assumption about the head
positioning of the component
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com writes:
[snip]
That is a lot of raids. Have you ever thought about using LVM? The
different raid1 will mess up
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:59:50PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I understand that the double recommendation is fine. Though, I am
pressed by answering the referees about a submitted paper as they
requested additional computation. That was going on until the host
suspended access to sda. As I
14 matches
Mail list logo
