On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 04:45:26PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
could you please comment on that? I have no experience with itk
whatsoever. Therefore, I do not how if this is a problem in itk or a
configuration issue.
This is almost certainly a configuration issue. It sounds like he is hitting
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:05:10PM -, Eric Messick wrote:
I encountered this bug as well.
The postinstall script ends up calling:
a2enmod -m -q mpm_itk
which prints:
WARNING: MPM_ITK is a third party module that is not part of the
official Apache HTTPD. It has seen less testing
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:51:42AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I intend to include the open_htaccess hook in the next upload. When
you want to move mpm-itk back into a separate source package, just say
say so and we will remove it from apache2.
This sounds good. I don't have the time to do
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:21:59AM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
Right now, apache2.preinst check for an installed apache2-mpm-* package and
creates a /etc/apache2/.apache2_mpm_selected temporary file with the
information.
apache2.postinst reads that file in enable_default_mpm() and
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:03:02PM +0200, AZ 9901 wrote:
I doubt that opening a bug would do much to remedy the situation, unless it
included a patch fixing the problem in a reasonable fashion.
Were do you advise me to open a bug report ?
Directly to ApacheSF Bugzilla ?
My point was that
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 03:58:15AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
Alternatively we could wait until 2.4.5 is released which might contain
all patches you require for your most recent itk patch. That would allow
us to build itk with apxs without patching the Apache source, possibly
even in a separate
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:29:57PM +0200, Henrik Heil wrote:
It is not a security issue. I think it could qualify as important
enough for stable-proposed-updates because:
FWIW, I don't think this is a security issue. I would not oppose the
inclusion of the fix, though; it's been in newer
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:20:57AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
That was a big PITA for the release and security teams. I don't think
we want to do that again. But I have looked at the patches by now, and
I think they are isolated enough that they will not break unrelated
things.
Some
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:23:54AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
But this of course doesn't mean that ITK won't be included, just that
it's not sure yet.
Just so it's clear: If you decide not to keep mpm-itk in the main source
package, please let me know before the freeze, so I can go back to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:23:54AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes I am aware of it. I haven't had a chance to review it yet, though,
and I thought that having the rest of the package already in
experimental would be a good idea. What makes me a bit cautios about
ITK is that it adds new
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:05:16AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Beware: The ITK MPM is not included for the time being. This may or
may not change until the freeze.
Just to make sure; you are aware that there is a 2.4 patch for mpm-itk
out, right? Having it in experimental would be a great
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:43:55PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I'm planning to support 2.4, but I won't be able to look at it before next
week. Somebody made a forward-port already, but I haven't been able to look
at it in detail:
http://lists.err.no/pipermail/mpm-itk/2012-February
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:06:47PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
There is now mod_privileges included upstream, which does something
similar to mpm itk but using Solaris privileges. It would be
interesting to check if ITK could use the same hooks and stop being a
MPM but become a normal
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:29:17PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
we're close to upload an experimental 2.4 package to Debian. Maybe you
could tell us what to do with the ITK MPM? Right now we dropped it
completely. Do you have any plans to support 2.4 in time of the
approaching freeze?
I'm planning
as root if
+NiceValue was set but AssignUserID was not set, due to incorrect
+config merging. (Closes: #618857)
+
+ -- Steinar H. Gunderson se...@debian.org Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:33:08 +0100
+
apache2 (2.2.16-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Also add $named to the secondary-init-script example
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:56:07PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Apache 2.2.12 has been released, and upstream has fixed a bug in
mpm_prefork in a different way than I did in the Debian package. Although
the itk patch applies cleanly, you may want to check that it still does
the right thing.
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.9-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please consider enabling mod_deflate by default. For most sites, this is
a reasonable default in that it conserves bandwidth without eating undue
amounts of CPU (only HTML and the likes is compressed -- in today's
AJAX-heavy world
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Of course, before any action, I'd like to hear Thom's or Andres' points
of view.
You probably want to hear my input too. :-)
At Debconf5, I was more or less persuaded into taking the package (up to
the level where I actually had the
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:42:46PM +0100, Daniel Déchelotte wrote:
But setting such a DefaultCharset *breaks* *working* pages (and
perfectly valid ones) for very little benefit. Sites that use latin
encoding for latin characters are *not* broken.
Discussions about best behavior aside, just to
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Attached is the diff for my apache2 2.2.3-3.1 NMU, currently in
DELAYED/3-day.
Andreas Barth already uploaded his own -3.1 NMU; IOW, please disregard this
diff, as it won't ever reach the archive.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: important
(I'm unsure if this bug is important or serious; I can't see any
immediate potential for breakage, though, so it doesn't sound RC to me.
Feel free to upgrade as you see fit.)
apache2.2-common seems to ship tons of files from a
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:29:20AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
This is in progress with upstream; we've worked with them to remove zb.c
from the upstream repository and are working to find a reasonable solution
to the RSA licensed files.
FWIW, a reasonable usable replacement for the MD5 functions
FWIW: dovecot has MD4 and MD5 implementations placed in the public domain
too.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
What happened to #225142? It is tagged `pending' but does not seem to have
been fixed with any recent a2-uploads; according to Tollef, it's not fixed in
svn either. Could you please give me some sort of update on this? :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Package: apache2-threaded-dev
Severity: normal
While trying to build Apache::Request for mod_perl 2.x, I got the
following error:
/usr/bin/apxs2 -i -a -n apreq mod_apreq.la
/usr/share/apache2/build/instdso.sh SH_LIBTOOL='/usr/bin/libtool' mod_apreq.la
/usr/lib/apache2/modules
sh: line 1:
25 matches
Mail list logo
