On Tuesday 13 February 2007 21:47, Joey Hess wrote:
Laz wrote:
Someone mentioned on this list back in January that they would build
an armel kernel package: did this ever happen? Can't see one in
http://armel-debs.applieddata.net/debian but I do see lots and lots
and lots of packages! :-)
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 09:11 +, Laz wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 21:47, Joey Hess wrote:
Laz wrote:
Someone mentioned on this list back in January that they would build
an armel kernel package: did this ever happen? Can't see one in
http://armel-debs.applieddata.net/debian but
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 21:47, Joey Hess wrote:
Laz wrote:
Someone mentioned on this list back in January that they would build
an armel kernel package: did this ever happen? Can't see one in
http://armel-debs.applieddata.net/debian but I do see lots and lots
and lots of packages! :-)
Laz wrote:
I'll try to swap over the rootfs properly at some point. Is there any way
of telling the kernel what to use as the root partition? I'm used to
being able to set it with grub!
At the moment, You'll need to solder on the four pins for a serial
console, and set the cmdline in Apex.
David Fokkema a écrit :
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 09:11 +, Laz wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 21:47, Joey Hess wrote:
Laz wrote:
Someone mentioned on this list back in January that they would build
an armel kernel package: did this ever happen? Can't see one in
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 10:10, Rod Whitby wrote:
Laz wrote:
I'll try to swap over the rootfs properly at some point. Is there any
way of telling the kernel what to use as the root partition? I'm used
to being able to set it with grub!
At the moment, You'll need to solder on the four
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:11:58AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Nice. Mine took 20 mins longer (real time), of which there was 3 mins
more user time. I had some other processes running, so... I was a bit
worried about the size of the deb, only 8.5M whereas my x86 debs are all
20+M,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:36:48AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
Attached is an updated version of the patch that turns on versatile. I
don't plan to rebuild with it right now since it takes several days on
the already busy thecus I've been using.
I'll start a build.
It completed
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:19:02AM +, Laz wrote:
So far, it looks like everything except 4 of the packages installed on my
Slug are in the armel port so I should be able to swap over properly.
(Just about to check out those 4 missing ones.)
Which ones?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Lennert Buytenhek a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:11:58AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Nice. Mine took 20 mins longer (real time), of which there was 3 mins
more user time. I had some other processes running, so... I was a bit
worried about the size of the deb, only 8.5M whereas my x86
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 11:17, you wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:19:02AM +, Laz wrote:
So far, it looks like everything except 4 of the packages installed
on my Slug are in the armel port so I should be able to swap over
properly. (Just about to check out those 4 missing
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:33:18AM +, Laz wrote:
From taking the output from dpkg --get-selections and feeding it
into apt-cache policy, I got versions for all but the following:
OK, my take on this list:
W: Unable to locate package catsboot
The CATS is a StrongARM machine (IIRC) and
* Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-14 12:44]:
W: Unable to locate package libklibc
klibc hasn't been ported over to armel yet:
W: Unable to locate package linux-image-2.6.18-3-ixp4xx
linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx is in the pool.
initramfs-tools requires klibc-utils, and the kernel
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:26 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I also cross-compiled the kernel on a x86 laptop (1.5 GHz) and that took
me about half an hour. First, I though that it wasn't working right (I
Note that you need
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:22, you wrote:
* Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-14 12:44]:
W: Unable to locate package libklibc
klibc hasn't been ported over to armel yet:
W: Unable to locate package linux-image-2.6.18-3-ixp4xx
linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx is in the
Laz a écrit :
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:22, you wrote:
* Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-14 12:44]:
W: Unable to locate package libklibc
klibc hasn't been ported over to armel yet:
W: Unable to locate package linux-image-2.6.18-3-ixp4xx
linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx is in
On 2007-02-14 13:35 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
I've been off and on maintaining two buildd hosts over the past year for
an armeb architecture, running on two NSLU2's in big endian mode.
Andreas Barth (Cc'ed) has been maintaining the ftp-master and
wanna-build side of things for that.
* Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-14 14:32]:
You can also uses yaird, which does not depends on klibc-utils
I doubt an image made with yaird will boot on the nslu2, though. In
any case, klibc supports EABI so you only need to patch the build
scripts.
--
Martin Michlmayr
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:50:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
You can also uses yaird, which does not depends on klibc-utils
I doubt an image made with yaird will boot on the nslu2, though. In
any case, klibc supports EABI so you only need to patch the build
scripts.
OK, klibc indeed
Lennert Buytenhek a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I also cross-compiled the kernel on a x86 laptop (1.5 GHz) and that took
me about half an hour. First, I though that it wasn't working right (I
Note that you need to use an arm eabi toolchain.
Lennert Buytenhek a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:36:48AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
Attached is an updated version of the patch that turns on versatile. I
don't plan to rebuild with it right now since it takes several days on
the already busy thecus I've been using.
I'll start a
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
Shouldn't matter -- if you use a gcc 4.1 that defaults to old-ABI to
compile your kernel but pass it command line options to set the ABI
to aapcs-linux (i.e. EABI, like the linux kernel build does), it
should work
-mabi=aapcs-linux = eabi?
Cool. Which is the abi
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:31:51AM -0800, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
I'm really happy that you've made this stuff available. Thank you so much!
However, I'm concerned about your band width and availability from the
yank side of the pond. Is anyone mirroring this repository yet? Or
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:22:36AM -0800, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
Shouldn't matter -- if you use a gcc 4.1 that defaults to old-ABI to
compile your kernel but pass it command line options to set the ABI
to aapcs-linux (i.e. EABI, like the linux kernel build does), it
should work
I've been testing Debian armel on a Linksys NSLU2 over the past couple of
days. I built a kernel with EABI support and this seems to work fine both
with the normal arm port and with the armel rootfs in a chroot environment.
I have now mounted the (USB) disk on another Debian box and replaced
Laz wrote:
I've been testing Debian armel on a Linksys NSLU2 over the past couple of
days. I built a kernel with EABI support and this seems to work fine both
with the normal arm port and with the armel rootfs in a chroot environment.
I have now mounted the (USB) disk on another Debian box
Rod Whitby wrote:
Looks like you're not loading the microcode.
FWIW, it's in /lib/firmware on an installed nslu2 system.
The LEDs won't light during boot unless nslu2-utils is installed, BTW.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
27 matches
Mail list logo
