Re: AArch64 planning BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:12:41AM +0100, Wookey wrote: > tools POV). The one _good_ reason for using the aarch64 name is avoiding > accidental matches with arm* in various bits of configery so leaving > that alone probably makes sense despite the silly name. How much of the arm* silliness is the

Re: AArch64 planning BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > [ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ] noted :) > I'm hoping to get AArch64 bootstrapped and ready for release in Debian > by Wheezy+1, which I acknowledge will take a lot of work in a > comparatively short space of time. We will nee

Re: AArch64 planning BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Wookey wrote: > Arm64 everywhere would have been neater but unless someone is > volunteering for a massive argument and changing upstream gcc and No way. it is difficult to do better at this kind of thing than Linus, and he has already said his piece :-p It won't be aarch64

Re: arm vfp variants, allowed instructions

2012-07-20 Thread peter green
peter green wrote: Does anyone know of a document summarising what floating point instructions are in what version of vfp? Answering my own question I found a document linked from the vfp comparision page on the debian wiki. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: modern cheap NAS fully supported by Debian?

2012-07-20 Thread Wookey
+++ Nicola Bernardini [2012-07-20 05:42 +0200]: > > I gave up on my NSLU 2 which seems irremediably broken (my guess is that > the RAM is botched) and I would like to buy another NAS in that price > range or whereabouts. And of course, I would like to be able to run a > full Debian system on

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Wookey
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2012-07-20 21:27 +0100]: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem. > > It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW. > > > > *) http://lists.debian.o

Re: AArch64 planning BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Wookey
+++ Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [2012-07-20 16:55 -0300]: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Naming > > == > > > > Naming issues: ARM are calling the new 64-bit architecture > > AArch64. Other people don't like that and various other names have > > been proposed for use elsewhere

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:58:45PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > We've been pestered several times by toolchain developers and > > upstreams for various other projects that generate code for ARM > > (e.g. JITs in browsers). It seems that Debian is about the only place > > where anybody still

Re: [Arm-netbook] ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, I have a spec sheet to devices for English. I ask whether this can be distributed. Please wait. Nobuhiro 2012/7/21 Dr. David Alan Gilbert : > * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, 19 Jul 20

Re: [Arm-netbook] ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 > > Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> buildds > >> === > >> > >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We > >

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:21:59PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Right. I've asked before who's still using v4t machines, and the > common response is "just openmoko". Thanks for mentioning others. > > We've been pestered several times by toolchain developers and > upstreams for various other pro

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:09:53PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We >>> don't have any ARM serve

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:09:53PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We >> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using >> development boards as

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 > Steve McIntyre wrote: >> buildds >> === >> >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We >> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using >> developm

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:08:03PM +0200, Martin Guy wrote: >On 19 July 2012 19:35, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> armel >> = >> >> First released with Lenny. Soft-float EABI, Software floating point >> assumed by default. v4t which also runs smaller-size thumb instruction >> set. Targeting old hard

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread shawn
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 22:08 +0200, Martin Guy wrote: > On 19 July 2012 19:35, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > armel > > = > > > > First released with Lenny. Soft-float EABI, Software floating point > > assumed by default. v4t which also runs smaller-size thumb instruction > > set. Targeting old har

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Martin Guy writes: > Who is it that keeps bringing this up? At least chromium seems to get much more testing on v5 systems so we expose new bugs when we build it fo v4t. This probably applies to some other upstreams that use hand-written assembler or JIT. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm

Re: ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Martin Guy
On 19 July 2012 19:35, Steve McIntyre wrote: > armel > = > > First released with Lenny. Soft-float EABI, Software floating point > assumed by default. v4t which also runs smaller-size thumb instruction > set. Targeting old hardware like openmoko. Discussed (again!) moving > forwards from v4. D

Re: AArch64 planning BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Naming > == > > Naming issues: ARM are calling the new 64-bit architecture > AArch64. Other people don't like that and various other names have > been proposed for use elsewhere. Debian/Ubuntu developers have already > picked the name "arm64" in dpk

arm vfp variants, allowed instructions

2012-07-20 Thread peter green
Does anyone know of a document summarising what floating point instructions are in what version of vfp? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5009a9fb.4010...

Re: modern cheap NAS fully supported by Debian?

2012-07-20 Thread Frank Fesevur
If you just want a simple and cheap NSLU2 replacement, have you thought about a RaspberryPi? With a simple cardboard case (see their forum), for a small amount you can use it as a NAS. Works fine for me ;-) Regards, Frank Op 20 jul. 2012 05:49 schreef "Nicola Bernardini" het volgende: > > Sorry

RE: SS4000E Fan speed, LEDS and power button

2012-07-20 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Installed lm-sensors. sensors-detect detects the w83792d chip root@Freestor:~# sensors w83792d-i2c-0-2d Adapter: IOP3xx-I2C VcoreA: +1.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +2.04 V) VcoreB: +0.00 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +2.04 V) in2: +2.55 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in3:

AArch64 planning BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ] Hi folks, Here's a summary of what we discussed in the AArch64 port planning BoF [1] last week (10th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've also attached

Re: modern cheap NAS fully supported by Debian?

2012-07-20 Thread DrEagle
Hi Martin, Is there any plan to support *officialy* the raidsonic IB 62x0 from IcyBox in Debian ? For now it is already supported by the denx uboot and will be in the next linux kernel. I have already one which runs debian squeeze with few tweaks. I'll soon upgrade another from the stock (fedora

Re: modern cheap NAS fully supported by Debian?

2012-07-20 Thread JF Straeten
Nicola, On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:42:30AM +0200, Nicola Bernardini wrote: > [...] and I would like to buy another NAS in that price range or > whereabouts. And of course, I would like to be able to run a full > Debian system on it. Debian Squeeze would be fine, [...] > Thank you for all your r

Re: SS4000E Fan speed, LEDS and power button

2012-07-20 Thread JF Straeten
Chris, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:41:27PM -0400, Chris Wilkinson wrote: > Thanks for the tips. Next I tried this and had some success but just > why this works escapes me. Well, it's Debian ;) > Loaded initird.gz, zimage > After each load, wrote the image to flash with fis create To make j

Re: modern cheap NAS fully supported by Debian?

2012-07-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nicola Bernardini [2012-07-20 05:42]: > I gave up on my NSLU 2 which seems irremediably broken (my guess is that If you want to replace a NSLU2, I recommend either a SheevaPlug or an eSATA SheevaPlug. They are both supported by Debian squeeze and wheezy: http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheev

RE: modern cheap NAS fully supported by Debian?

2012-07-20 Thread Paul Kench
> Sorry list, I can imagine this question has been asked many times, > but > the answer changes with time and browsing this list and > related > resources I cannot find a sufficiently recent (let's say < 1 > year) > answer to it. > > I gave up on my NSLU 2 which seems irremediably br