tis 2012-07-24 klockan 00:02 +0100 skrev Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
rright. many thanks to the person on arm-netbooks who found that the
netgear ReadyNAS boxes can take standard DDR3 SO-DIMMs.
apparently there are lots of people who have been upgrading them from
the pathetic 256mb they
Mersin mmer...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] ARM port(s) BoF at DebConf
To: Linux on small ARM machines arm-netb...@lists.phcomp.co.uk
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:06 PM, lkcl luke luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Gordan Bobic
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
... which is debian-arm [arm-netbooks cc'd to keep people there informed]
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have
On 19 July 2012 19:35, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
armel
=
First released with Lenny. Soft-float EABI, Software floating point
assumed by default. v4t which also runs smaller-size thumb instruction
set. Targeting old hardware like openmoko. Discussed (again!) moving
forwards
Martin Guy martinw...@gmail.com writes:
Who is it that keeps bringing this up?
At least chromium seems to get much more testing on v5 systems so we
expose new bugs when we build it fo v4t. This probably applies to some
other upstreams that use hand-written assembler or JIT.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 22:08 +0200, Martin Guy wrote:
On 19 July 2012 19:35, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
armel
=
First released with Lenny. Soft-float EABI, Software floating point
assumed by default. v4t which also runs smaller-size thumb instruction
set. Targeting old
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:08:03PM +0200, Martin Guy wrote:
On 19 July 2012 19:35, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
armel
=
First released with Lenny. Soft-float EABI, Software floating point
assumed by default. v4t which also runs smaller-size thumb instruction
set. Targeting old
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:09:53PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the
Hi,
I have a spec sheet to devices for English.
I ask whether this can be distributed.
Please wait.
Nobuhiro
2012/7/21 Dr. David Alan Gilbert d...@treblig.org:
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:58:45PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
We've been pestered several times by toolchain developers and
upstreams for various other projects that generate code for ARM
(e.g. JITs in browsers). It seems that Debian is about the only place
where anybody still cares
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2012-07-20 21:27 +0100]:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem.
It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW.
*)
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the ARM ports BoF [1] last
week (10th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video
team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you
missed it. I've also attached the Gobby
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA
for hosting and
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
there was a post on the arm-netbook mailing list about a 7W quad-core
tegra3-based mini ITX motherboard which could take up to 2gb of RAM.
whether it's the usual
let's-put-something-out-there-see-if-anyone-is-actually-interested
style of vapourware or actual
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
[...]
(*1) and if someone _really_ wants a debug build of that particular
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:13 PM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
there was a post on the arm-netbook mailing list about a 7W quad-core
tegra3-based mini ITX motherboard which could take up to 2gb of RAM.
whether it's the usual
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a
Hi,
2012/7/20 Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp:
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
buildds
===
Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
development
21 matches
Mail list logo
