Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel build, Image size problems

2023-09-11 Thread Philippe Clérié
For what it's worth, if it helps I can pitch in and test. I have a QNAP HS-210 and a TS-212P that I've retired since the first time I read that Debian would drop armel arch. I know there have been workarounds the limitations, and I keep having plans to implement at least one. But! Good

Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel build, Image size problems

2023-09-11 Thread bodhi
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:10:04 AM UTC-7, Gianluca Renzi wrote: > On 9/10/23 04:55, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:42 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > >> The first one is the one with included size limitations, because those > >> load the kernel from a pre-defined

Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel build, Image size problems

2023-09-11 Thread Gianluca Renzi
On 9/10/23 04:55, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:42 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: The first one is the one with included size limitations, because those load the kernel from a pre-defined flash partition, whose size can't be easily changed by the user.  This one is now overflowing for