Hi Andreas,
On Freitag, 20. März 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The new locations of the auto generated pages for the existing
> Blends are:
Nice!
One suggestion though: currently you calculated the bugginess of a metapackage
by the number of bugs their depnds have. I'd suggest to divide that by
Hi Andreas,
On Samstag, 21. März 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > One suggestion though: currently you calculated the bugginess of a
> > metapackage by the number of bugs their depnds have. I'd suggest to
> > divide that by the number of packages that metapackage depends on :-)
> to regard. Please
Hi,
On Sonntag, 22. März 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> suggestion. If I remember right we decided that the absulute measure
> just attracts people who want to find a job to do - which is
> finally the sense of the bugs pages.
I dont think that a status of 2000 open bugs for this metapackage attra
Hi,
On Montag, 23. März 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Editing
> alioth:/srv/alioth.debian.org/chroot/home/groups/blends/htdocs/edu/index.ht
>ml
a.) is this documented somewhere?
b.) editing files not in a VCS is a waste of time ;-)
> If you are interested in detail we should talk about this imple
Hi,
On Freitag, 10. April 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Warning: post-commit hook failed (exit code 255) with no output.
> and there is no mail send to the commit list. But this only seems
> to be true for me. Other commits to the list trigger an e-mail.
> So any help to fix this is very welc
package: blends
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Montag, 2. November 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I think foolproofness is more important today, given that almost all
> > developers have broa
it's for their own benefit to
contribute back. Minimising the diff to a "real" pure Blend is good :-)
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/11/msg1.html
-- Holger Levsen Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:25:26 +0100
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please beware that this list - debian-blends - is for discussions about
> "Pure Debian Blends" which is completely and purely Debian internalised
> environments, not customizations based on but deriving (even the
> slightest) away from
Hi Walber,
On Montag, 26. April 2010, Walber Zaldivar Herrera wrote:
> I'm working on SiXdeb a project from a group of cuban folks to generate
> Cuba oriented Debian Blends or CDDs. We have a doubt: could be
> considered a *Debian Blend* a CDD with packages from diferent repos?
Sure!
It's a Debi
On Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> If indeed activated by default in official releases, then
> debian-volatile packages targeted those releases are pure.
they are.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > education, which is for education related tools that don't fit better
> > metapackages, which is for metapackages so that apt can do special
> Where would you like to see th
Hi Olav,
On Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, Olav Dahlum wrote:
> Due to safety guidelines and restrictions, the conference room have limited
> space, so contact one of us to make sure there's a spot for you as well.
> Contact information and schedule are available at
> http://friprogramvareiskolen.no/Ga
On Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Should we not address this approach (blend bugs = RC critical bugs ->
> make NMUing possible) on debian-devel ML?
NMUs are also possible for non-rc bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-blends-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Hi Andreas,
wouldnt it be better to do this after the freeze+release of wheezy? Or is this
your plan?
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-blends-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
> anyway and so I consider switching the Blends repository from SVN to
> Git.
yay!
> 1. git://git.debian.org/git/debian-blends/blends.git
> Repository for the blends source package as a clone of
> current svn://svn.de
Hi Andreas,
On Mittwoch, 24. April 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 6. Blends Metapackages in Wheezy
>
>
> All sets of metapackages for Blends targeting at Wheezy arrived in
> testing:
>
> debian-edu: 1.702
what's the point of this statement?
I seriously wond
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 24. April 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > All sets of metapackages for Blends targeting at Wheezy arrived in
> > > testing:
> > > debian-edu: 1.702
> Currently 1.702 *is* in testing and as far as I have understood release
> team they do not like any further unblocks.
drawi
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> The draft wheezy press release has this item in it:
>
> [Debian Blends news] ...
>
> Could someone review the changes since squeeze and come up with some
> things that users might be interested in?
Debian Edu is working on it's Wheezy release
package: blends-dev
version: 0.6.16.2
affects: debian-edu
Hi,
blends-dev creates boilerplate maintainer scripts, which then lead to lintian
warnings for the packages using blends-dev, ie debian-edu 1.707 has the
following lintian warnings:
debian-edu changes binary: bad-distribution-in-changes
clone 720199 -1
reassign -1 blends-dev
retitle metapackages should be put into the metapackages section
thanks
Hi Andreas,
On Mittwoch, 21. August 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> that's an interesting issue you are reporting here. IMHO it should be
> rather filed against blends-dev. IMHO we shoul
On Freitag, 30. August 2013, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I disagree strongly about that: Blends is about emphasizing how Debian
> is flexible and can be optimal for *some* things to *some* people *some*
> of the time. Not only making it so, but also emphasizing what is
> already so.
>
> Let me repe
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 3. April 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'd recommend using the Blends framework to assemble the according OTR
> software.
I think you misunderstood the purpose of the OTR packaging team, which has the
goal of maintaining packages from the OTR universe. We don't want to
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 27. August 2014, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I guess this only makes sense if a Debian Edu machine (standalone) can
> be installed via Debian's normal D-I, right?
why? and why limit this to stabalone?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
Hi,
On Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> While this "no" means: There exist 1 or 2 Blends focussing on a
> specific desktop environment (as far as I know Debian Edu and Ezgo) but
Debian Edu offers you the documented choices between KDE Plasma (default),
Gnome, Mate, Xfce4, LXDE
package: blends-dev
Hi Andreas,
this is probably not a bug in the blends-dev package, but who knows ;)
http://blends.debian.net/edu/bugs/ misses the education-desktop-mate
metapackage which was introduced in jessie.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If you do not like the situation that the Debian Edu entry page is
> refering to a broken / outdated link I'd recommend reading...
well, I certainly don't like outdated / broken information, so I reported this
bug. And here it e
control: fixed -1 0.6.92
Hi,
On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> this bug was closed in version 0.6.92 but the changelog was lacking an
> according Closes statement.
closing it properly then :)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Hi,
On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> It is not important for me. I was just wondering why you might create
> extra work for potential co-workers from the Blends team to join an
> additional team. Did you set at least ACLs for DDs?
with git^wdistributed VCSs you don't really
Hi Andreas,
On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
> two recent threads on this list made me wonder whether my motivation
> to work on Blends was well described.
I think it would be helpful to distinguish two things: the work on Blends and
the work on blends-dev.
Personally, I am i
Hi,
two more ideas from irc:
< pabs> KiBi, tbm: re blends/desktops stuff, what about showing that only in
expert mode?
< h01ger> or a dedicated image, which uses a kernel cmdline param to enable
blends-mode…
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Package: blends-dev
Version: 0.6.93
Severity: important
Hi,
since 0.6.93 blends-dev creates a new $blend-all package which is *not*
useful for all blends, so there should be a way to disable that.
In the case of debian-edu it creates an education-all package which
depends on packages which confl
Hi,
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:30:39PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> The relevant gosa-plugin* pks should go into Depends: of education-mainserver
> task/bin:pkg. IMHO.
I'm not sure we can do this using the blends-dev package.
Background for the blends developers:
The debian-edu source package
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:51:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> You can do this with the attached patch overriding the dist target to
> afterwards change the d/control file. Feel free to `git am` into the
> repository.
thanks for the patch, though #825004 has broken the "dist" targe
Hi Ole,
adding the debian-edu list to cc: (and keeping more context quoted) as this
is quite relevant for us…
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:02:36PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> Am 22.05.2016 um 12:45 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > since 0.6.93 blends-dev creates a
package: blends-dev
severity: wishlist
version: 0.6.16.2
Hi,
debhelper uses a nice thing called compat level, which has to be set in
each source package. So if compat is set to 9, $these features are
enabled, and if compat is set to 10, $these features *and* $those are
enabled. (eg dbgsym package
control: block 793667 by 825004
thanks
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 07:53:05AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> thanks for the patch, though #825004 has broken the "dist" target for us
> in sid…
>
> I'll think whether I want to use this to fix this issue (#793667) in jessie
&
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:50:30AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Depending how fast you need a solution you could easily add another sed
> call in the new dist target to work around #825004. Feel free to ask me
> for another patch.
That would be much appreciated indeed. (Aka: Could
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > That would be much appreciated indeed. (Aka: Could you please give us
> > such a patch?!)
> Commited to Git.
thanks.
I've seen you also added a "closes: 825004" to our debian/changelog,
which I've rewritten to "worka
package: blends-dev
severity: wishlist
version: 0.6.16.2
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
to fix #793667 Andreas Tille kindly implemented this solution in
src:debian-edu's Makefile:
dist:
# the next two lines are taken from the original dist target
# from blends-dev
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:42:48PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I've seen Ole busy commiting changes to Git in the direction of
> fixing this. :-)
oh, cool, looking forward to those! :)
thanks!
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Ole,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:20AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> The current solution is to opt-out the tasks that shall not be there. As
> I said, this may be easily changed to opt-in, and then create the -all
> package if there was *any* opt-in package.
emphasise on "current solution"…
Hi,
sorry for the silent reassign this bug…
> > reassign 473890 blends-dev
> Bug #473890 [debian-edu] provide hooks for reportbug via dh-buildinfo to ease
> debugging
the bug history explain nicely why this would be useful and how it
should be done…
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Hi,
any update on this? Due to this bug (or rather Andreas' workaround for
it in our debian-edu package) we are receiving two mails every day since
two months… :(
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 02:58:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Wouldn't it be the most simple solution to simply add a grep -v to your
> cron job to silence this mail.
> The solution you are asking for is quite
> complex, needs thorrough thinking and adjustments in all Blends, while a
> simple f
Package: blends-dev
Version: 0.6.93
Severity: normal
Hi,
tracker.d.o/debian-edu tells me the debian-edu has 21 lintian warnings,
which can be found at
https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-...@lists.debian.org.html#debian-edu
and which are all
education-astronomy
W command-with-pa
Package: blends-dev
Version: 0.6.94
Severity: normal
Hi,
please use (= ${source:Version}) for generated arch:all depends so that
binNMUs don't cause uninstallable packages.
For src:debian-edu we've worked around this by this sed command (which
does more than this) in our Makefile:
sed -
Package: blends-dev
Version: 0.6.94
Severity: normal
Hi,
please add ${misc:Depends} to all generated binary packages if debhelper is
used to build the package in question. Debhelper might add maintainer
scripts which need certain depends, and in such cases debhelper will
populate ${misc:Depends}
Source: blends
Version: 0.6.94
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Policy 2.5 and breaking another package
Hi,
I'm sorry, but the current implementation of installing Blends from Debian
images is simply not acceptable, as in, it completely breaks the UI of
debian-installer thus the severit
Package: debian-cd
Version: 3.1.18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Hi,
as a followup to #846002:
How to allow Debian blends be installed easily from official Debian media?
My idea to implement official Debian which can be used to install blends is to
introduce "flavors" (or spins or whatever, jus
Package: debian-cd
Version: 3.1.18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
affects: blends-tasks
Hi,
as a followup to #846002 and #846003, please provide a flavor/spin netinst
image with blends-tasks installed. #846003 has the implementation
details, this bug is for tracking the installable media with
blend
Hi Andreas (& Ole),
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:04:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder what your opinion about the two existing answers might be. You
> requested a discussion about your proposed patch but you did not took
> part in the last 36 hours.
>
> I hope you are fine and kind regar
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:58:03AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Control: Severity -1 normal
>
> Since no objections against my proposal were expressed for a week, I am
> lowering the severity.
>
> Since there is no update of the bug report with more recent experiences,
> I will to close it as of
reassign 846002 tech-ctte
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:58:03AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Control: Severity -1 normal
src:blends 0.6.93 uploaded on 09 Apr 2016 introduced a new binary
package, blends-dev, with "priority: important", causing it to be
installed on *all* systems by debootstr
control: reassign -1 tech-ctte
control: retitle -1 blends-tasks must not be priority:important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:43:18AM -0600, Don Armstrong wrote:
> if either of you disagree (or anyone else on the CTTE
> disagrees) and still want the CTTE to resolve this (slowly), feel free
> to
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 06:23:25PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> blends 0.6.99 has now been uploaded, however the bug closure was forgotten
> in the changelog stanza (I'll add that post-upload for documentation
> purposes).
great, thanks to everyone involved!
--
cheers,
Holger
signatur
Package: blends-dev
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
http://blends.alioth.debian.org/blends/ap-DevelDescription.en.html has
been moved where to? It's referenced in
src:debian-edu/debian/README.source.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: blends-dev
Version: 0.7.0
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading to blends-dev 0.7.0 I got this when trying to run "make
dist" in debian-edu.git…:
debian-work:~/Projects/debian-edu/git/debian-edu$ schroot make dist
/bin/sh: 1: bc: not found
expr: syntax error
rm -f debian-
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:48:41AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> To find out what Blend should be considered as active I proposed to
> write this e-mail to the main communication channel and ask the
> developers of the Blend to confirm they consider themselves an active
> Blend and will provide mor
58 matches
Mail list logo
