cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk by dwhedon

2001-05-11 Thread dwhedon
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk who:dwhedon time: Thu May 10 23:37:50 PDT 2001 Log Message: fix build failure on sparc. This completely reverses the change made from r1.7 to r1.8. Files: changed:partbl_msdos.c -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: build error for dbootstrap on sparc

2001-05-11 Thread David Whedon
I may have been too hasty in fixing the sparc build failure. (see recent cvs activity) After further investigation I notice that I may have broken powerpc in the process. Not having a powerpc machine to test on I don't know if that is the case. I'm looking for some input. Here's the story:

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Martin Schulze
Adam Di Carlo wrote: Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? Targetting which distribution? Regards, Joey -- Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Adam Di Carlo wrote: Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? Targetting which distribution? 2.2.x are potato's AFAIK Marcin -- Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:18:09AM -0400 wrote: Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? Sounds reasonable, once busybox 0.52 arrives we'll have largely functioning boot-floppies, I believe. Um, David, you realize 2.2.24

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Adam Di Carlo wrote: Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? Targetting which distribution? 2.2.x are potato's AFAIK Yes, see the subject

Re: build error for dbootstrap on sparc

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4 Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it doesn't have to include kernel headers. This will avoid the conflicts. Why kernel 2.4 though? Boot floppies mostly uses kernel 2.2 and every arch uses a

Re: build error for dbootstrap on sparc

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe I should do this? Looks ugly, but might not break ppc: Index: partbl_msdos.c === RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.c,v retrieving revision

cvs commit to boot-floppies/documentation by aph

2001-05-11 Thread aph
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation who:aph time: Fri May 11 07:58:47 PDT 2001 Log Message: don't attempt to build or install Danish docs -- they don't exist yet Files: changed:Makefile.docs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Common Linux installer

2001-05-11 Thread Benjamin Meyer
Hey there, I had this thought about a common linux installer going around my head and was wondering what other people thought of it. http://www.csh.rit.edu/~benjamin/log/e_clig.shtml Good? bad? allready done? -Benjamin Meyer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

cvs commit to boot-floppies by aph

2001-05-11 Thread aph
Repository: boot-floppies who:aph time: Fri May 11 08:39:15 PDT 2001 Log Message: rootdisk: i386, m68k, and sparc are on libc6 2.2.3 Files: changed:rootdisk.sh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

cvs commit to boot-floppies/debian by aph

2001-05-11 Thread aph
Repository: boot-floppies/debian who:aph time: Fri May 11 08:39:21 PDT 2001 Log Message: rootdisk: i386, m68k, and sparc are on libc6 2.2.3 Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread David Whedon
Um, David, you realize 2.2.24 would be Potato, right? umm, nope, please ignore my cluelessness, thanks. I will also try to release 2.3.2 for Woody as soon as I can compile it. that's the one waiting for busybox, as I'm sure you know. David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk by dwhedon

2001-05-11 Thread dwhedon
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk who:dwhedon time: Fri May 11 08:53:12 PDT 2001 Log Message: Put back in the __KERNAL__ hack from r1.8 but this time make it conditional on __powerpc__ since that is the only arch that appears to need it, and it breaks sparc. Files:

Solemn Assembly

2001-05-11 Thread Post
Through acquaintance with of the world cultural values towards common economic ethic to the implementation of new forms of cooperation and investment Dear Sir! The Organizing Committee is glad to invite You to take part at the Solemn Assembly Russia and Asian World: Culture

powerpc woody bf installation status

2001-05-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On ppc I can now get all the way to extracting base. Sorry about breaking Sparc -- I thought I recalled seeing __KERNEL__ in at least asm-i386/unaligned.h, but it must have been my fuzzy eyes. I have a couple simple patches to commit -- hopefully tonight -- one fixes a build error and the other

Re: busybox

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Erik Tews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:05:20AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Erik Tews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is anybody going to create a new version of boot-floppys for potato with a new version of busybox? Because the current one is unable to mount a

Re: powerpc woody bf installation status

2001-05-11 Thread David Whedon
Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:56:34PM -0500 wrote: On ppc I can now get all the way to extracting base. glad to head it :-) Sorry about breaking Sparc -- I thought I recalled seeing __KERNEL__ in at least asm-i386/unaligned.h, but it must have been my fuzzy eyes. no biggie. I have a couple

cvs commit to boot-floppies/documentation by porridge

2001-05-11 Thread porridge
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation who:porridge time: Fri May 11 13:50:07 PDT 2001 Log Message: Polish translation by Pawe³ Têcza [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: added: Tag: potato dselect-beginner.pl.sgml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

cvs commit to boot-floppies/debian by porridge

2001-05-11 Thread porridge
Repository: boot-floppies/debian who:porridge time: Fri May 11 13:55:53 PDT 2001 Log Message: addition of dselect-beginner translation Files: changed:Tag: potato changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Common Linux installer

2001-05-11 Thread David Whedon
Neat, this definately would be a good thing. The current debian-installer project might be able to become what you are talking about. We definately have the IU abstracted from the guts and the different functional parts are well broken up into independant modules. I've been thinking about ways

cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap by stephen.r.marenka

2001-05-11 Thread stephen . r . marenka
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap who:stephen.r.marenka time: Fri May 11 18:47:54 PDT 2001 Log Message: Added PPC driver disks to dbootstrap Files: changed:extract_kernel.c -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

cvs commit to boot-floppies/debian by stephen.r.marenka

2001-05-11 Thread stephen . r . marenka
Repository: boot-floppies/debian who:stephen.r.marenka time: Fri May 11 18:54:00 PDT 2001 Log Message: powermac bf-common has no *.tgz which halts build Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

cvs commit to boot-floppies by stephen.r.marenka

2001-05-11 Thread stephen . r . marenka
Repository: boot-floppies who:stephen.r.marenka time: Fri May 11 18:53:59 PDT 2001 Log Message: powermac bf-common has no *.tgz which halts build Files: changed:release.sh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)

2001-05-11 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:57:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Attached to this message is a tarball which contains a rather simple program that uses debconf to present the user with a list of tasks (sorted into groups). Are you serious? No, really, are you? I can't see any hint that you're

Bug#97220: sparc tftp image doesn't start dbootstrap

2001-05-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:47:39PM -0400, Chaskiel M Grundman wrote: Package: boot-floppies Version: 2.3.0 (a.k.a 2.3.0-2001-04-13) architecture: sparc model: Sun Ultra 5 memory:256MB scsi: n/a cd-rom:n/a network card: Sun Happy Meal (PCI) pcmcia:

Bug#97220: sparc tftp image doesn't start dbootstrap

2001-05-11 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
Excerpts from mail: 11-May-101 Re: Bug#97220: sparc tftp i.. by Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not sure about the segfault, but FYI, the Unimplemented system call has nothing to do with it. I guess I should have mentioned that I knew that. I included the info partially so that someone else who did

Bug#97220: sparc tftp image doesn't start dbootstrap

2001-05-11 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
I just tried 2.3.1 from http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/, and it has the same problem. The only added info is that the log on tty3 is now spewing line after line of the form May 12 04:09:59 (none) user.info init: Process '/sbin/dbootstrap (pid 293) exited. Scheduling it for

Re: Full install from cd achieved (RFC)

2001-05-11 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 03:49:06PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: First of all, I have used some things from unstable to achieve this, I have made my local woody Packages files and cds have modutils 2.4.5-2, dpkg 1.9.4 and debconf 0.9.40. Of this only debconf is really needed (thanks

cvs commit to boot-floppies/documentation by aph

2001-05-11 Thread aph
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation who:aph time: Fri May 11 22:32:11 PDT 2001 Log Message: Polish has dselect manual now Files: changed:Tag: potato Makefile -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? Yes please. Ok. I am not moving i386 to straigh 2.2.19 right now, btw, since I'm pretty sure that kernel has issues. I can do a 2.2.25 with that shortly, however, for testing.

Re: build error for dbootstrap on sparc

2001-05-11 Thread Ben Collins
Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4 On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:19:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: I can't build the woody version on sparc: gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -c -o partbl_msdos.o partbl_msdos.c In file included from /usr/include/asm/string.h:11,

Bug#97220: sparc tftp image doesn't start dbootstrap

2001-05-11 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
Package: boot-floppies Version: 2.3.0 (a.k.a 2.3.0-2001-04-13) architecture: sparc model: Sun Ultra 5 memory:256MB scsi: n/a cd-rom:n/a network card: Sun Happy Meal (PCI) pcmcia:n/a When I boot this tftp image, dbootstrap doesn't start. This appears on

Woody install report

2001-05-11 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hello, On Monday I had to install my new box and decided to go for Woody directly. This is my report. Preparation --- Hardware: Duron 800, QDI motherboard with VIA chipset, rlt8139 ethernet card, Savage4 video card, 40Gb ata100 IDE drive. Boot-floppies: used those provided by manty, with