> Um, David, you realize 2.2.24 would be Potato, right? umm, nope, please ignore my cluelessness, thanks. > > I will also try to release 2.3.2 for Woody as soon as I can compile > it. that's the one waiting for busybox, as I'm sure you know. David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? David Whedon
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? David Whedon
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Martin Schulze
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Marcin Owsiany
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Philip Blundell
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- potato b-f 2.2.24 testing/building Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Matt Kraai
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Erik Andersen