Package: installation-reports
Boot method: How did you boot the installer? CD.
Image version: Full URL to image you downloaded is best 4.0.r3 netinst
iso.
Date: Date and time of the install 17-4-2008 to 22-4-2008.
Machine: Whitebox, Asus P5K Premium Wi-fi motherbaird with Perc 3CDL
raid
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to
xvda is most natural.
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:39 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:39 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've left any parted enhancements out for now, as you say they would be
a useful further specification in the future.
What do you mean here?
The Unknown
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:02 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I just meant that the Unknown could become Xen Virtual disk in
the future adding a bit more detail to the Virtual disk as Frans
suggests above (I think, quoting a bit complex up there ;-)).
I managed to follow, we're on the same
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to
xvda is most natural.
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I could go on to replace PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT with dev-sector_size
throughout partman-base/parted_server.c, but I'm getting suspicious.
Isn't there a good reason
Package: installation-report
Version: today's daily build
Severity: normal
When a pre-existing DOS label is used on a 2 TiB disk, partman still thinks
it can use the remaining free portion of the disk without replacing the
partition label.
For example, if your disk is 4 TiB in size, but an
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I could go on to replace PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT with dev-sector_size
throughout partman-base/parted_server.c, but I'm
Package: libcairo-directfb2-udeb
Version: 1.4.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Breaks debian-installer
I just tested the graphical installer with the new libraries and I'm
afraid there's a serious regression. It looks like old screen content is
not getting wiped when new elements
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 10:20 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've left any parted enhancements out for now, as you say they would
be a useful further specification in the future.
Please post the proposed patch so I can take a look at it.
There is no proposed patch for this bit, Ferenc's
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 477333 partman-base
Bug#477333: when a pre-existing DOS label is used on a 2 TiB disk, partman
gets confused
Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to `partman-base'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:56:06AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I could go on to replace PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
When a pre-existing DOS label is used on a 2 TiB disk, partman still
thinks it can use the remaining free portion of the disk without
replacing the partition label.
I would guess that libparted is feeding partman bogus information. Can you
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Please help test etch and a half
--
The next point release of etch is targeted to be the etch and a half
release, with the limited intent of increasing the hardware supported by
the Debian 4.0 release. An
(Please reply to debian-boot; reply-to set.)
Hi Martin,
Over the past few weeks I've solved several issues in D-I related to the use
of /dev/mdX versus /dev/md/X and I've been wondering what the official
status is of both as it seems there are at least some inconsistencies.
Partman currently
Frans, all I know is documented in
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=blob;f=debian/FAQ,
item 3.
Anything else, Neil (on Cc) will have to explain... full mail
further down, with more inline comments from me.
also sprach Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.22.1725 +0200]:
Hi Martin,
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Does parted 1.8.8 exhibit the same problem? I managed to compile it,
but can't start on a ramdisk:
# ~/installcd/parted/parted/parted /dev/ram1
Error: Error opening /dev/ram1: Invalid argument
Retry/Cancel? c
If current parted does support
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
Here are some of the inconsistencies I've noticed:
- /dev/mdX and /dev/md/X are created with different permissions
Forgot to specify that. At least in D-I I see that /dev/mdX is owned by
root:root, while /dev/md/X is owned by root:disk.
Package: mdcfg
Version: 1.24
During an installation test I was working in a virtual machine with two
disks. The second harddisk still had two partitions previously used for
RAID tests while the first hard disk had been reused in the mean time.
For the second hard disk one of the partitions was
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
Package: libcairo-directfb2-udeb
Version: 1.4.14-1
I just tested the graphical installer with the new libraries and I'm
afraid there's a serious regression. It looks like old screen content is
not getting wiped when new elements get displayed.
Package: debian-installer
Version: 40r2
Followup-For: Bug #411552
There are many (older) PC BIOSes that do support USB keyboard but only
in BIOS, not once an OS (like syslinux) is booted. Of course, Linux can
use the keyboard with appropriate drivers but syslinux cannot.
This applies to recent
Package: debian-installer
Version: 40r2
Severity: important
I tried to install debian with this installer CD:
debian-40r2-i386-businesscard.iso 03-Jan-2008 01:4332M
The GUI installer works but the default one fails bootstrap and
complains that there is missing gpgv which is needed to
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
Partman currently prefers the use of /dev/md/X and uses that when
creating new RAID devices. This results in both /dev/md/X and /dev/mdX
block device files being created.
The latter should be symlinks.
Hmm. They are not, at least not in
also sprach Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.22.1820 +0200]:
What's responsible for creating them: udev or mdadm itself?
mdadm.
We do. The superblock is version-0, but mdcfg does use /dev/md/X (and has
done since its original upload in 2004).
What we do for new RAID devices is:
mdadm
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Does parted 1.8.8 exhibit the same problem? I managed to compile it,
but can't start on a ramdisk:
# ~/installcd/parted/parted/parted /dev/ram1
Error: Error opening /dev/ram1: Invalid argument
Retry/Cancel?
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
What we do for new RAID devices is:
mdadm --create /dev/md/$MD_NUM --auto=yes --force -R -l type dev
spec
That's the problem. You should be able to change that to md/$MD_NUM
and then just use mdX everywhere without much trouble.
I suspect
Op 22-04-2008 om 17:41 schreef Michal Suchanek:
snip/
debian-40r2-i386-businesscard.iso 03-Jan-2008 01:4332M
That '32M', what does it mean?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# ~/installcd/parted/parted/parted /dev/ram1
Error: Error opening /dev/ram1: Invalid argument
Retry/Cancel? c
If current parted does support that correctly, I suggest you file a BR
against the
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
What do you think about #467324 ? Do you think it will make sense to
include Gnash in the Desktop task?
Gnash is quite stable now, and even though not all Adobe Flash is
supported yet, it can be quite an improvement over not having any
flash player installed. As Adobe is
On Friday 04 April 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
I couldn't see any obvious way to configure d-i to use my serial
mouse, nor any way to find out what mouse it was currently using.
This is now supported, though still not in an obvious way [1]. It would be
great if you could test that it works using a
Op 22-04-2008 om 17:41 schreef Michal Suchanek:
The GUI installer works but the default one fails bootstrap and
complains that there is missing gpgv which is needed to verify packages.
I doubt that this is really a bug in the installer because otherwise we'd
have had a lot more reports. Can
On Apr 22, 2008, at 7:03 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Op 22-04-2008 om 17:41 schreef Michal Suchanek:
The GUI installer works but the default one fails bootstrap and
complains that there is missing gpgv which is needed to verify
packages.
I doubt that this is really a bug in the installer because
Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:08:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#477354: debian-installer: fails to bootstrap because
of missing gpgv
has caused the Debian Bug report #477354,
regarding debian-installer: fails to bootstrap because of missing gpgv
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 477356 pending
Bug#477356: mdcfg: errors if a pre-existing RAID device is inactive
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# ~/installcd/parted/parted/parted /dev/ram1
Error: Error opening /dev/ram1: Invalid argument
Retry/Cancel? c
If current parted does support that correctly, I suggest
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
but in the end there are several differences in the /var/log/*
permissions compared to an
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:13:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
What do you think about #467324 ? Do you think it will make sense to
include Gnash in the Desktop task?
Gnash is quite stable now, and even though not all Adobe Flash is
supported yet, it can be quite
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:28:57PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
[...], and has all the support
from FSF, which is more or less quite a guarantee for the future
evolution.
Last I heard, they also have support of some sort from EFF and OLPC:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9454721484.html
--
also sprach Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.22.1843 +0200]:
I suspect that should have read /dev/md$MD_NUM.
Of course. :)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck -
2008/4/22, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
What do you think about #467324 ? Do you think it will make sense to
include Gnash in the Desktop task?
Gnash is quite stable now, and even though not all Adobe Flash is
supported yet, it can be quite an improvement over
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 474556 pending
Bug#474556: partman-base: Please include XEN virtual device recognition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
tag 456784 pending
Bug#456784: grub-installer: Please support Xen virtual disks /dev/xvd[a-z]
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:37:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
When a pre-existing DOS label is used on a 2 TiB disk, partman still
thinks it can use the remaining free portion of the disk without
replacing the partition label.
I would guess
tag 474556 pending
tag 456784 pending
thanks
I've committed the latest patch for partman-base from:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/04/msg00852.html
I've also committed Ian's patch for grub-installer (#456784).
Thanks to both Ian and Ferenc for their work on this.
Cheers,
FJP
--
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
swfdec might be an option too. For what I know, Gnash supports more
Flash than swfdec,
How long have you used each? (I assume you've used gnash a lot since you
maintain it..) I've only tried each for a few hours myself, about once
per month since January, as I use websites
Robert Millan wrote:
My understanding is that both gnash and swfdec are currently robust pieces
of software. I'd be glad to see either being part of our default desktop.
I'd generally agree, although I think we'll need to do a good job of
documenting that the nonfree flash is not included by
[ dropping debian-devel, not of general interest ]
[ added debian-publicity ]
Hi!
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080422 17:25]:
Please help test etch and a half
[..]
I have built two etchnhalf netinst CD images (i386 and amd64) for people
who'd like to try them out. They contain:
If we add
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 477333 libparted1.7-1 1.7.1-5.1
Bug#477333: when a pre-existing DOS label is used on a 2 TiB disk, partman
gets confused
Bug reassigned from package `partman-base' to `libparted1.7-1'.
tags 477333 d-i
Bug#477333: when a pre-existing DOS
reassign 477333 libparted1.7-1 1.7.1-5.1
tags 477333 d-i
thanks
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
When a pre-existing DOS label is used on a 2 TiB disk, partman still
thinks it can use the remaining free portion of the disk without
replacing the partition label.
To be completely
(Really added d-publicity as I'm not sure if you're subscribed to the
others.)
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
I have built two etchnhalf netinst CD images (i386 and amd64) for
people who'd like to try them out. They contain:
If we add that to the next issue of the
How long have you used each? (I assume you've used gnash a lot since you
maintain it..) I've only tried each for a few hours myself, about once
per month since January, as I use websites with flash that neither
supports, but my general impression is that swfdec supports more sites,
including
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:03 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #188865
has caused the Debian Bug report #188865,
regarding FTBFS: current cvs checkout doesn't build
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:10 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #308471
has caused the Debian Bug report #308471,
regarding autopartkit: should not have hardcoded limit on the number of
partitions
to be
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:07 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #385888
has caused the Debian Bug report #385888,
regarding autopartkit: should use update-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #254945
has caused the Debian Bug report #254945,
regarding b0rks if /target already exists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:15 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #212442
has caused the Debian Bug report #212442,
regarding autopartkit failure (with mounted partitions and swap)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:02 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #216711
has caused the Debian Bug report #216711,
regarding autopartkit has problems with a not present removable drive
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:09 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #218755
has caused the Debian Bug report #218755,
regarding autopartkit: no progress bar when creating LVM volumes
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:08 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #308619
has caused the Debian Bug report #308619,
regarding autopartkit: Sort's volumes after size, not after mountpoint
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:05 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit has been removed from Debian, closing #228289
has caused the Debian Bug report #228289,
regarding autopartkit: makes partitions that does not end on cylinder boundary.
to be marked as
rootskel_1.62_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.62.dsc
rootskel_1.62.tar.gz
rootskel_1.62_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.62_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.62_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.62_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.62.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.62.dsc
rootskel_1.62.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.62.tar.gz
rootskel_1.62_i386.udeb
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 476524 installation-guide
Bug#476524: debian-installer: DI Manual Bug: the use of killall.sh as described
kills itself
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `installation-guide'.
tag 476524 pending
Bug#476524: debian-installer: DI Manual
reassign 476524 installation-guide
tag 476524 pending
thanks
On Friday 18 April 2008, Durk Strooisma wrote:
Hmm but killall.sh doesn't use pidof... Well I'm not sure if my problem
is clear, but correct me if I'm wrong.
Anyway, to clarify: killall.sh works perfectly, but people should not use
64 matches
Mail list logo
