Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, cliquez ici
En exclusivité sur le Web !
Enregistrez votre recherche et attendez d'être contacté par le vendeur
www.annonces-automobile.com
En partenariat avec
A bientôt sur ANNONCES Automobile. Pour vous désinscrire, cliquez ici.
Hello,
On Thu, 22 May 2008 16:21:19 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
> > and the logs say, that keymap de_DE was loaded, but umlauts did not work
> > (äöü) and also the ß. This all works fine in text mode installer.
> >
> > Additionally "Shift" + "3" didn't worked correctly: in graphical installer
> > outpu
I can not duplicate this on any of my Power Mac machines.
It sounds like a hardware problem... Have you checked that all your
RAMs are firmly seated in their sockets?
Rick
On May 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Chao Cao wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Problem:
The installation CD will not boo
tags 482417 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:14:49PM +0200, Thanatermesis wrote:
> The command 'mount' fails when is trying to mount a squash filesystem
> image, in the initramfs, that's a very used case on liveCD's (this bug
> affects directly to the debian-live project)
Used parameter
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 482417 moreinfo
Bug#482417: mount fails with squash filesystems on initramfs, message: 'block
device required'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 19:32:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475774: fixed in debian-installer 20080522
has caused the Debian Bug report #475774,
regarding Please include a version.txt in the boot.img.gz image
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 19:32:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#477988: fixed in debian-installer 20080522
has caused the Debian Bug report #477988,
regarding Document irqpoll in the "special boot parameters" help screen
to be marke
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2008 16:50:59 Josef Wolf wrote:
> > But wasn't ppp originally intended to connect multiple networks? In
> > this (IMHO _very_ common) scenario you would always have at least two
> > interfaces: ppp to the provider and
pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20080522_amd64.deb
Changes: debian-installer (20080522) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Stephen R. Marenka ]
* Add atari keymaps to pkg-lists for m68k.
.
[ Frans Pop ]
* Lenny will be version 5.0.
* Improve consistency between x86 syslinux
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
partconf | 1.22 | arm
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be p
debian-installer_20080522_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20080522.dsc
debian-installer_20080522.tar.gz
debian-installer_20080522_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20080522_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
-
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
debian-installer_20080522.dsc
debian-installer_20080522.tar.gz
debian-installer_20080522_amd64.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .ch
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:52:04PM +0300, Mert Dirik wrote:
> Package: win32-loader
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
>
> Turkish translation of win32-loader is attached. I committed it to SVN days
> ago,
Thanks!
> but D-I translation status page shows it untranslated. So please include
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 482411 pending
Bug#482411: [win32-loader] [INTL:tr] Turkish translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Thursday 22 May 2008 16:31:55 Josef Wolf wrote:
> I've done some more investigations, and it looks like this is not a
> new inconsistency. It seems to already exist for quite a while. I
> have multiple etch boxes here, some with "provider" and some with
> "dsl-provider". AFAICS, it boils down
On Thursday 22 May 2008 16:50:59 Josef Wolf wrote:
> But wasn't ppp originally intended to connect multiple networks? In
> this (IMHO _very_ common) scenario you would always have at least two
> interfaces: ppp to the provider and a statically configured interface
> to the local network. Further,
Op 22-05-2008 om 16:50 schreef Josef Wolf:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > No. You currently use either ppp-udeb or netcfg, never both. If you use
> > ppp-udeb, the PPPoE interface is expected to be your primary (and in most
> > cases only) network interface.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.9.2-3
The command 'mount' fails when is trying to mount a squash filesystem
image, in the initramfs, that's a very used case on liveCD's (this bug
affects directly to the debian-live project)
I have verified that the pro
Package: win32-loader
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Turkish translation of win32-loader is attached. I committed it to SVN days ago,
but D-I translation status page shows it untranslated. So please include Turkish
translation. (Of course use SVN version if you can)
Thanks
# Turkish messages
On Thursday 22 May 2008 15:25:13 Glenn wrote:
> I' after some advice as to how to submit a patch for
> wpasuppliant-udeb. Looking at (for example) openssl, it has the udeb
> stuff in the main package. With wpasupplicant, we need a separate conf
> file so that we don't include unnecessary driver
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2008 14:04:40 Josef Wolf wrote:
> > I am curious whether it is really a good idea to point
> > $HOSTNAME.$DOMAINNAME to 127.0.1.1. While this works fine for services
> > on the local host, it fails if the address is pr
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:47:45 Holger Wansing wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> In graphical installer I chose
> "Keyboard - german"
> and the logs say, that keymap de_DE was loaded, but umlauts did not work
> (äöü) and also the ß. This all works fine in text mode installer.
>
> Additionally "Shift"
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:06:42PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2008 13:32:37 Josef Wolf wrote:
> > I am somewhat confused about the naming of the ppp provider file. On
> > debian systems it used to be /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider at least since
> > sarge. On ubuntu, it used to be
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401715: Language selection list display vertically
unaligned translated names
has caused the Debian Bug report #401715,
regarding localechooser: in the graphical installer, native names of
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401715: Language selection list display vertically
unaligned translated names
has caused the Debian Bug report #401715,
regarding Language selection list display vertically unaligned transl
Hello,
I' after some advice as to how to submit a patch for
wpasuppliant-udeb. Looking at (for example) openssl, it has the udeb
stuff in the main package. With wpasupplicant, we need a separate conf
file so that we don't include unnecessary drivers, clients and EAP
code. I can supply a patch
On Thursday 22 May 2008 14:04:40 Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am curious whether it is really a good idea to point
> $HOSTNAME.$DOMAINNAME to 127.0.1.1. While this works fine for services
> on the local host, it fails if the address is provided to other hosts.
> For example, if one installs dnsmasq, the $
On Thursday 22 May 2008 13:32:37 Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am somewhat confused about the naming of the ppp provider file. On
> debian systems it used to be /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider at least since
> sarge. On ubuntu, it used to be the same.
>
> But when in the sources (retrieved with "apt-get sour
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 01:40:18 Joey Hess wrote:
> FWIW, this is the only instance of split(' ', ...) in debconf, aside from
> one in a rarely used code path. But I don't see anything wrong with
> the code in debconf, so I think that rather than change those, this needs
> to be reassigned to perl
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Daniel Pocock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > b) The domU systems should be indistinguishable from normal systems -
> > using D-I is one way to ensure this. It seems reasonable to expect
> > that any changes to the install
I am sorry for warming up an old thread. But I got somewhat confused
about one detail of this patch to ppp-udeb:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:39:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007, Josef Wolf wrote:
> > IMHO, the setting in /etc/resolv.conf is mostly for convenience. It
> >
Hello,
I am somewhat confused about the naming of the ppp provider file. On
debian systems it used to be /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider at least since
sarge. On ubuntu, it used to be the same.
But when in the sources (retrieved with "apt-get source ppp-udeb") I
find no trace of this file. There
* Aurelien Jarno [Wed, 21 May 2008 15:34:33 +0200]:
> Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8, which are both
> blocked because of their udeb. They have no known regression.
Unblocked after ack from Otavio. Will syncs udebs when migrated.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
Hi Jamil,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:16:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> > I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_
34 matches
Mail list logo
