Hi,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:56:04AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:49:22PM +0200, Michael Kesper wrote:
network card (r1000?) isn't detected
module r8169 is loaded and chokes, see syslog
You forgot to attach it, it seems…
Sorry, it was too late! ;)
Logs now
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:31:46 +0200
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you know of any way we could check that the driver is being loaded
but loading is not complete, then we could possibly add a pause.
If the syslog of the installation clearly shows the progress of the
loading process,
On Sunday 06 July 2008, Michael Kesper wrote:
Comments/Problems:
network card (r1000?) isn't detected
That's the device with PCI ID [1814:0781] in the hardware summary.
It seems that it is currently not supported by any free Linux drivers, and
thus not by the Debian kernel.
See here for some
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:22:23PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
This assertion is completely wrong. The kernel wasn't ready until last
upload so we were not blocking it since it wasn't _ready_ to migrate
to testing.
No. We seem to have different definitions of ready. The whole bunch of
linux
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:28:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
- linux-2.6 has been ready to migrate to testing for 3 months.
IIRC I check its excuses fairly regularly and until recently it's
had RC bugs keeping it out.
This does not match the bug list. There is 1 RC bug open which already
On Monday 07 July 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you know of any way we could check that the driver is being loaded
but loading is not complete, then we could possibly add a pause.
If the syslog of the installation clearly shows the progress of the
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:18:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
module r8169 is loaded and chokes, see syslog
Known issue; see: http://bugs.debian.org/471892
Upgrading to the 2.6.25 kernel from unstable may well fix this.
Will have to try. How can I do this during install?
With 2.6.24 I
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5
Please wait few more days until we get it properly done on sid (d-i
migrates to it).
Why? We have never blocked migration of a new kernel when that
On Monday 07 July 2008, Michael Kesper wrote:
Will have to try. How can I do this during install?
With 2.6.24 I have no network and after installation I do not get any
drives.
Change to a debug shell (on VT2 or VT3) some time after base system
installation is complete but no other steps are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:28:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
- linux-2.6 has been ready to migrate to testing for 3 months.
IIRC I check its excuses fairly regularly and until recently it's
had RC bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5
Please wait few more days until we get it properly done on sid
On Monday 07 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008, Michael Kesper wrote:
Will have to try. How can I do this during install?
With 2.6.24 I have no network and after installation I do not get any
drives.
Change to a debug shell (on VT2 or VT3) some time after base system
(adding d-kernel and d-release)
On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5
Please wait few more days
Frans Pop a écrit :
Se IMO we should take a real good look at .25 and .26 and check what's
new, what's important for Lenny and what's risky, and maybe check if some
things we do want could be backported.
As the release team is Cc:ed, I just want to make sure it is aware that
switching to
Package: debian-installer
Version: Debian Installer trunk
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n
The Italian translations of debian-installer's level3 menu_po-sections
is incomplete.
I'm sending the updated po file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers hardy-updates
APT
All the above is complete Greek too me because I don't
have any context.
And it sounds like you already did the hard part: you
managed to get it
working. That means you are the expert now. Tell us *in
detail* what is
missing and what manual steps were required to get it
supported. Then
I need to correct an error in my previous e-mail. In my previous e-mail,
I said that the dasd_diag_mod driver could only be used with CMS
minidisks. As it turns out, that is not true. The dasd_diag_mod driver
can also be used with minidisks formatted with the Linux disk layout
(ldl). Such a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:19:01PM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Se IMO we should take a real good look at .25 and .26 and check what's
new, what's important for Lenny and what's risky, and maybe check if some
things we do want could be backported.
As the release
MD, Thanks for fixing this so quickly.
udev is already frozen as part of the base freeze. Do you hope to get a
freeze exception for this new upstream release? If not, before the next
d-i release, I'd like to upload a modified version of 0.114 to t-p-u,
that drops firmware.agent from the udeb, so
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080707 19:48]:
Changing kernel at this point of the release would be too destructive,
so unless there is a big fat problem in the .25 that the .26 should fix
and is unbackportable (does such a beast even exist ?) I'm rather
opposed to it. Note that the
hw-detect_1.64_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.64.dsc
hw-detect_1.64.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.64_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.64_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.64_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.64_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
On Jul 07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev is already frozen as part of the base freeze. Do you hope to get a
freeze exception for this new upstream release? If not, before the next
I definitely hope to get multiple exceptions later, or lenny will have
quite a crappy udev...
Hmm,
On Friday 04 July 2008, Chris Steel wrote:
When I upgraded my toolchain to gcc 4.3.x then an arm rootfs still
reduces with mklibs and runs correctly. However the mips build breaks
mklibs with the following error:
Known error for mips; see #445507.
Cheers,
FJP
signature.asc
Description: This
Frans Pop schrieb:
On Monday 07 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008, Michael Kesper wrote:
Will have to try. How can I do this during install?
With 2.6.24 I have no network and after installation I do not get any
drives.
Change to a debug shell (on VT2 or VT3) some time after
elilo-installer_1.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
elilo-installer_1.13.dsc
elilo-installer_1.13.tar.gz
elilo-installer_1.13_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Monday 07 July 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
MD, Thanks for fixing this so quickly.
To be honest, I'd personally preferred to see the modified script included
by udev. But that's debatable and done now.
Hmm, there might be other changes in the new udev that are needed by
bits of d-i, such as the
kickseed_0.50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kickseed_0.50.dsc
kickseed_0.50.tar.gz
kickseed-common_0.50_all.udeb
initrd-kickseed_0.50_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
cdrom-detect_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.29.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.29.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
installation-report_2.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-report_2.36.dsc
installation-report_2.36.tar.gz
save-logs_2.36_all.udeb
installation-report_2.36_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
rootskel_1.63_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.63.dsc
rootskel_1.63.tar.gz
rootskel_1.63_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.63_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Accepted:
archdetect_1.64_i386.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.64_i386.udeb
disk-detect_1.64_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.64_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.64_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.64_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.64.dsc
to
preseed_1.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
preseed_1.38.dsc
preseed_1.38.tar.gz
preseed-common_1.38_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
env-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
Greetings,
debian-installer-utils_1.60_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.60.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.60.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.60_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.60_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.60_all.udeb
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#487228: fixed in hw-detect 1.64
has caused the Debian Bug report #487228,
regarding Installer should support loading firmware for bnx2 driver
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Saturday 05 July 2008, =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Bobbio wrote:
The attached patch changes partman_lock_unit() and
Space instead of tab indented (in partman_lock_unit):
done
+cd $cwd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Saturday 05 July 2008, =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Bobbio wrote:
The attached patch changes partman_lock_unit() and
partman_unlock_unit() to restore the current directory once their job
is done. I am not commiting this patch directly as I doubt it to be
the best way to do this.
Looks
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I fully agree. In the past, we never waited for all arches in
d-i to move to a new kernel
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
(adding d-kernel and d-release)
On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
Accepted:
initrd-kickseed_0.50_all.udeb
to pool/main/k/kickseed/initrd-kickseed_0.50_all.udeb
kickseed-common_0.50_all.udeb
to pool/main/k/kickseed/kickseed-common_0.50_all.udeb
kickseed_0.50.dsc
to pool/main/k/kickseed/kickseed_0.50.dsc
kickseed_0.50.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
installation-report_2.36.dsc
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.36.dsc
installation-report_2.36.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.36.tar.gz
installation-report_2.36_all.deb
to
Accepted:
elilo-installer_1.13.dsc
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.13.dsc
elilo-installer_1.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.13.tar.gz
elilo-installer_1.13_i386.udeb
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.13_i386.udeb
Override entries
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.26 is the release kernel.
so i'm happy with push on it.
.25 is a possible backup.
I'd like to get an official statement from RM team about that so we
can move it further.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Accepted:
env-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/env-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/initrd-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.38_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_1.29.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.29.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.29.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.29.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.29_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.29_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.63_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.63_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.63.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.63.dsc
rootskel_1.63.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.63.tar.gz
rootskel_1.63_i386.udeb
to
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.60.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.60.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.60.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.60.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.60_all.udeb
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That is very strange as the driver needed by your disk controller is a
standard ahci driver. Please check in the initramfs debug shell:
- if that driver is loaded
- if some other (IDE?) disk driver is loaded
- any messages in 'dmesg'
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:17:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#488493: fixed in rootskel 1.63
has caused the Debian Bug report #488493,
regarding rootskel: Expose the theme to the text frontend as well
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: Installation-reports
Boot method: DVD
Image version: debian-4.0r3-i386-DVD-1.iso
Date: Mon Jul 7, 2008 7:05 pm
Machine: hp server tc2120 (470061-156)
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 2.80 GHz Integrated 512-KB Level 2 cache Memory:
4x256(512) MB PC2100 DDR SDRAM DIMM running at 266MHz,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008, Michael Kesper wrote:
Will have to try. How can I do this during install?
With 2.6.24 I have no network and after installation I do not get any
drives.
Change to a debug shell (on VT2 or VT3) some time
On Monday 07 July 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
There are valid arguments to be found for staying with 2.6.25 a bit
longer, but D-I has not yet converted to it is NOT one of them.
testing users are currently on an unsupported kernel.
Eh, how does that follow my last para which I assume you
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I fully agree. In the
On d-i's manual, section about preseed:
Where is Whether to upgrade packages after debootstrap. I suggest to put
debootstrap around a command tag.
As debootstrap it's a program, this may be helpful for translators.
Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
On Monday 07 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
.26 also includes at least one change I know of that is somewhat risky:
PAT support for x86 (which could be disabled).
#d-uk just gave me this tidbit:
... am I missing something or will the move to .26, with libata binding
before most of the IDE stuff,
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
Where is Whether to upgrade packages after debootstrap. I suggest to
put debootstrap around a command tag.
As debootstrap it's a program, this may be helpful for translators.
As this is a comment in the preseed file that's also extracted into a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM team,
Here goes a small hintset that unblock few packages ready to go and
that were being blocked due udeb binaries:
unblock dmraid
unblock e2fsprogs
unblock expat
unblock fbset
unblock hdparm
unblock libusb
unblock thaifonts-scalable
Dear mentors, Dear debian-boot ML,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package di-netboot-assistant.
(I am CCing debian-boot in case someone has some interest in it)
* Package name: di-netboot-assistant
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : Franklin Piat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.29_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.29.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.29.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.29_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.29_ia64.udeb
ltsp is again blocked from migrating into testing, likely due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by
debian-installer by default.
it has been in unstable for 8 days without introducing new problems, and
fixes several bugs.
thanks!
also, i noticed that even though the
(new) ata-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.29_ia64.udeb extra debian-installer
ATA disk modules
This package contains core ATA disk modules used by both PATA and SATA
disk drivers.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.29_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package
Franklin PIAT wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package di-netboot-assistant.
(I am CCing debian-boot in case someone has some interest in it)
This looks like some nice work. I wonder if it would make sense for it
to be maintained inside the d-i project?
It's tightly related to d-i,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ltsp is again blocked from migrating into testing, likely due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by
debian-installer by default.
it has been in unstable for 8 days without
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:34:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio,
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ltsp is again blocked from migrating into testing, likely due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by
debian-installer by default.
it has been in unstable for 8 days without introducing new
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello RM team,
Here goes a small hintset that unblock few packages ready to go and
that were being blocked due udeb binaries:
unblock dmraid
unblock e2fsprogs
unblock expat
unblock fbset
unblock hdparm
unblock libusb
unblock thaifonts-scalable
unblocked
66 matches
Mail list logo
