Bug#225802: marked as done (disk device names not persistant from install to target system)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004me...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #225802, regarding disk device names not persistant from install to target system to be marked as done.

Bug#368294: marked as done (debian-installer: go back continue are the same if ROOT(/) not selected)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004mg...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#368294: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #368294, regarding debian-installer: go back continue are the same if ROOT(/) not selected to be marked as

Bug#530904: marked as done (calls udevinfo which no longer exists)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004mi...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#530904: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #530904, regarding calls udevinfo which no longer exists to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processing of base-installer_1.100_i386.changes

2009-06-02 Thread Archive Administrator
base-installer_1.100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_1.100.dsc base-installer_1.100.tar.gz base-installer_1.100_all.udeb bootstrap-base_1.100_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

base-installer_1.100_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-06-02 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: base-installer_1.100.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.100.dsc base-installer_1.100.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.100.tar.gz base-installer_1.100_all.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.100_all.udeb

Bug#531572: busybox: mkswap should generate UUIDs

2009-06-02 Thread Colin Watson
Package: busybox Version: 1:1.13.3-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch karmic Since the rest of the installer is moving to UUIDs by default, busybox mkswap needs to generate swap areas containing UUIDs in order that they can be

Re: Reverted: activation PDF for Japanese translation of Installation Guide

2009-06-02 Thread nabetaro
Hi Frans, On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:44:24 +0200 Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: As you may already have noticed, I reverted [1] the part of your last commit that activated generating a PDF variant for Japanese. I'm sorry. My changes as last committed included mistakes. I didn't mean to

Re: Reverted: activation PDF for Japanese translation of Installation Guide

2009-06-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, nabet...@caldron.jp wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:44:24 +0200 Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: As you may already have noticed, I reverted [1] the part of your last commit that activated generating a PDF variant for Japanese. I'm sorry. My changes as last

Results of the second run of research about ext4 support in bootloaders

2009-06-02 Thread Stefano Canepa
Hi all, I continued my research about ext4 support in bootloaders and this is the result till now: ext4 support * grub: amd64, i386, powerpc w/ ubuntu patch * grub2: amd64, i386, powerpc * lilo-installer: amd64 i386 Looks without ext4 support * aboot: alpha *

Bug#531600: busybox grep gives SEGV on ppc

2009-06-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Package: busybox-static Version: 1:1.10.2-2 `busybox grep' crashes with a segmentation fault, on both ppc32 and ppc64: | # busybox grep | Segmentation fault | # Backtrace (on ppc64): | # gdb -args busybox grep | GNU gdb 6.8-debian | Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. | License

Re: Results of the second run of research about ext4 support in bootloaders

2009-06-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stefano Canepa s...@linux.it [2009-06-02 18:58]: Looks without ext4 support colo (mipsel) is probably missing from that list. * delo: mipsel delo is not used in d-i anymore (the devices supported by delo are no longer supported by d-i or the Debian kernel). -- Martin Michlmayr

Re: [D-I] Please test Debian Installer with console-setup

2009-06-02 Thread Stefano Canepa
Il giorno lun, 01/06/2009 alle 15.35 +0200, Christian Perrier ha scritto: One of the release goals of Debian Installer for squeeze is dropping the use of console-data keyboard mappings, to replace them by console-setup [1]. ... Please just don't pay too much attention to possibly untranslated

Bug#531291: After installing console-setup does not the ö ä å keys work as supposed

2009-06-02 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:45:29AM +0200, Anders Lagerås wrote: I don't get the å ä ö charachters as I used to, instead som some strange charachters and two charachters for each time pressing a key. Thanks for you report. Can you answer the following questions: 1. What symbols do you see

Bug#531482: console-setup: add a console-setup-hp-ekmap?

2009-06-02 Thread Anton Zinoviev
[Adding a CC to debian-h...@lists.debian.org] On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: console-setup Version: 1.36 Severity: normal Hello, First, I see in config.proto that models are explicited for all Debian archs but hppa. From kbd-chooser it seems

Bug#531478: /etc/{kbd|console-tools}/remap not supported

2009-06-02 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: I miss this functionality, and I don't think we should ditch it because it's very handy (just doing a couple adjustments in a keymap, eg. for keybindings). I also found no documentation in console-setup about how to achive

Bug#531482: console-setup: add a console-setup-hp-ekmap?

2009-06-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Anton Zinoviev, le Tue 02 Jun 2009 23:47:55 +0300, a écrit : I also notice in kbd-chooser the mention of hil, which is available in xkb-data as hp(hil), maybe a console-setup-hp-ekmap package should be added, providing it? I have no idea what hp(hil) is for, It's in xkb/keycodes/hp.

Processed: tagging console-setup bugs (2)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 524233 pending Bug#524233: console-setup should conflict with console-data There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 524239 pending Bug#524239: console-setup should conflict with console-tools There were no tags set. Tags added:

Processed: tagging console-setup bugs

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: priority 524233 minor Bug#524233: console-setup should conflict with console-data Severity set to `minor' from `serious' priority 524239 minor Bug#524239: console-setup should conflict with console-tools Severity set to `minor' from `serious'

Bug#531482: console-setup: add a console-setup-hp-ekmap?

2009-06-02 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: I have no idea what hp(hil) is for, It's in xkb/keycodes/hp. I meant I have no idea in what cases hp(hil) is used. From some HOWTOs I can guess that the usual keycodes can be used even when HIL interface is used for the

Bug#531646: console-setup: Better explanations needed when (re)configuring

2009-06-02 Thread Paul Vojta
Package: console-setup Version: 1.36 Severity: minor When (re)configuring console-setup (at least with the non-GUI method of (re)configuring), there is no text prior to the list of keyboard models, so the user is left to guess whether the question is about keyboard types, video cards, or what.

Bug#213482: Reply to your Wal-Mart request

2009-06-02 Thread walmartnewsletters
Dear Customer, Thank you for contacting us at Walmart.com. The email address you just contacted is not monitored, as we are unable to personally respond to messages sent to that address. Please do not reply to this email; instead, please resend your message to one of the following: To

Re: Log from the June 1st 2009 D-I team meeting

2009-06-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: http://d-i.debian.org/meetings-logs/20090601/log I realized that meeting-logs was inaccurate as there are many meetings, so I changed the directory name and links on the wiki page but omitted to change the link I posted. No, the original name

Re: Log from the June 1st 2009 D-I team meeting

2009-06-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl): On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: http://d-i.debian.org/meetings-logs/20090601/log I realized that meeting-logs was inaccurate as there are many meetings, so I changed the directory name and links on the wiki page but omitted to

[D-I] Please test Debian Installer with console-setup

2009-06-02 Thread Christian Perrier
(for those who read -boot as well, this message is a duplicate as I stupidly made a typo when sending the original message, intended to be CC'ed to -boot and -i18n) One of the release goals of Debian Installer for squeeze is dropping the use of console-data keyboard mappings, to replace them by

Processed: fixed in svn

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 529363 + pending Bug#529363: grub-installer: make sure grub-pc gets used when ext4 is chosen Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 530904 + pending Bug#530904: calls udevinfo which no longer exists Tags were: patch Tags added: pending

Re: Log from the June 1st 2009 D-I team meeting

2009-06-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: Not that important, but isn't logs of the meetings, shortened to meetings' logs correct English? It would be correct if you had two directories: ./meetings/logs/ But when combined into a word or phrase (which you effectively do when you

Re: Log from the June 1st 2009 D-I team meeting

2009-06-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: I disagree with you; while I agree that d-i.alioth.d.o exists for ages I do believe d-i.debian.org is much nicer for documents and easier to remember for users. So I see no big issue to use it. yet more looking for the right ressource for

Re: Log from the June 1st 2009 D-I team meeting

2009-06-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Holger Levsen wrote: On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: I disagree with you; while I agree that d-i.alioth.d.o exists for ages I do believe d-i.debian.org is much nicer for documents and easier to remember for users. So I see no big issue to use it.

Bug#472704: Failure while configuring base packages -- But why?

2009-06-02 Thread Michael Prokop
* Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net [20090602 08:34]: $ sudo debootstrap sid foo http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian I: Retrieving Release I: Retrieving Packages I: Validating Packages I: Resolving dependencies of required packages... I: Resolving dependencies of base packages... I: Found

Change Debian Text Installation Mode

2009-06-02 Thread Joaquin Manuel
Hi, It's possible to change Debian Text Intallation colours? We have extracted initrd but can't find anything related to menu colours. Thanks -- Joaquín Manuel Llano Montero Linux Registered User #481540

Re: Change Debian Text Installation Mode

2009-06-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Joaquin Manuel wrote: Hi, It's possible to change Debian Text Intallation colours? We have extracted initrd but can't find anything related to menu colours. For the newt (textual) frontend they are compiled into the cdebconf program (see

Re: Change Debian Text Installation Mode

2009-06-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joaquin Manuel, le Tue 02 Jun 2009 11:24:23 +0200, a écrit : Hi, It's possible to change Debian Text Intallation colours? We have extracted initrd but can't find anything related to menu colours. It's in the cdebconf package in src/modules/frontend/newt/newt.c See newtAltColorPalette,

Processing of debian-installer-utils_1.69_i386.changes

2009-06-02 Thread Archive Administrator
debian-installer-utils_1.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_1.69.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.69.tar.gz di-utils-shell_1.69_all.udeb di-utils-reboot_1.69_all.udeb di-utils-exit-installer_1.69_all.udeb

debian-installer-utils_1.69_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-06-02 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: debian-installer-utils_1.69.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.69.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.69.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.69.tar.gz di-utils-exit-installer_1.69_all.udeb to

Processing of partman-target_60_i386.changes

2009-06-02 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-target_60_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-target_60.dsc partman-target_60.tar.gz partman-target_60_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

partman-target_60_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-06-02 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: partman-target_60.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_60.dsc partman-target_60.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_60.tar.gz partman-target_60_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_60_all.udeb Override entries for your package:

Bug#389881: marked as done (SCSI device renaming breaks install)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004me...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #225802, regarding SCSI device renaming breaks install to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#308565: marked as done (disk device names not persistant from install to target system)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004me...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #225802, regarding disk device names not persistant from install to target system to be marked as done.

Bug#509378: marked as done (should use labels for all partitions in fstab)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004me...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #225802, regarding should use labels for all partitions in fstab to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#295134: marked as done (disk device names not persistant from install to target system)

2009-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 + with message-id e1mbtcx-0004me...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60 has caused the Debian Bug report #225802, regarding disk device names not persistant from install to target system to be marked as done.