Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:12:01 +0200
Source: localechooser
Binary: localechooser
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.46
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
cdebconf_0.174_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.174.dsc
cdebconf_0.174.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.174_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.174_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.174_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.174_i386.deb
cdebconf_0.174_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.174.dsc
cdebconf_0.174.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.174_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.174_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.174_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.174_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.174_i386.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:38:59 +0200
Source: cdebconf
Binary: cdebconf cdebconf-gtk libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev
cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb
cdebconf-slang-udeb
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.49
Downstream Bug:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=775614
The os-prober didn't work on efi firmware that each operation system
loader is in the efi system partition rather than the boot sector.
It remains using the legacy approach somehow and one of
Christian PERRIER, le Mon 17 Sep 2012 07:11:12 +0200, a écrit :
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
Frankly speaking, I have no idea why, in 2004, we decided to drop
choices with non ASCII characters. I guess this is because of some
limitation of debconf or po-debconf at
Hello!
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Brian Potkin claremont...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 16 Sep 2012 at 12:59:02 +0300, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote:
In #682737 [1] is stated that netcfg writes configuration for wireless
interface in /etc/network/interfaces and therefor Wi-Fi card is not
Hello Sorina!
Sorina - Gabriela Sandu sandu.sor...@gmail.com (16/09/2012):
In #682737 [1] is stated that netcfg writes configuration for wireless
interface in /etc/network/interfaces and therefor Wi-Fi card is not
managed by Network-Manager.
For that matter, I would like to propose a patch
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Sorina - Gabriela Sandu (sandu.sor...@gmail.com):
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682737
[2]
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting lee (l...@yun.yagibdah.de):
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
this is a feature request: It would be nice if users would have at
least a web browser like lynx and an irc client available while they
are using the installer.
On Mon 17 Sep 2012 at 11:25:27 +0300, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Brian Potkin claremont...@gmail.com wrote:
I realise a default is only a default and the selection can be changed,
but I'm puzzled by the third option. Why treat a wireless install
The installer (in expert mode) supports an ssh client on an alternative
VT, afaik. One can connect to another machine with stuff already
installed via this if necessary. Surely this is sufficient to address
the request.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
announcement,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello,
tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the
prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and
explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me.
That's why I'm going to
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
(replying to -devel and -boot only)
(I am not subscribed to -boot. Please keep -devel on replies, or CC me
directly).
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Philipp
Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote:
For that matter, I would like to propose a patch to add support for
netcfg to write a Network Manager config file and modify the
finish-install script so that it copies to target either the nm-config
file or a full /e/n/i config, according to a reasonable default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 674560 + pending
Bug #674560 [os-prober] A patch to add support for reading Fedora's grub2
config file
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
674560:
Brian Potkin wrote:
I realise a default is only a default and the selection can be changed,
but I'm puzzled by the third option. Why treat a wireless install
differently from a wired install? It would expected that a user who has
chosen not to use a wired connection would still want
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 682538 0.174
Bug #682538 [cdebconf] cdebconf-text-udeb should provide a way to disable
wrapping-around
Marked as fixed in versions 0.174/.
Bug #682538 [cdebconf] cdebconf-text-udeb should provide a way to disable
wrapping-around
Marked Bug
rootskel-gtk_1.26_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.26.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.26.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_1.26_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Joey Hess wrote:
I notice this links network-manager to libuuid. Which is an amazingly
Of couse I meant it links netcfg to libuuid..
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Richard Owlett wrote:
Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and
into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers?
One should, but as d-i on the live CD is currently implemented, one
cannot. d-i runs as a fullscreen window, and I couldn't see any
Joey Hess, le Mon 17 Sep 2012 11:57:14 -0400, a écrit :
Richard Owlett wrote:
Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and
into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers?
One should, but as d-i on the live CD is currently implemented, one
cannot. d-i
On Mon 17 Sep 2012 at 11:57:14 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and
into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers?
One should, but as d-i on the live CD is currently implemented, one
cannot. d-i
Brian Potkin, le Mon 17 Sep 2012 18:13:01 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon 17 Sep 2012 at 11:57:14 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and
into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers?
One should,
Voilà il y a quelqu jour j au vu qu en tapant mon nom sur Google des
information personnel et confidentiel me concernée comment peut on supprimer la
page merci c est urgent
Envoyé de mon iPhone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
netcfg_1.90_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.90.dsc
netcfg_1.90.tar.gz
netcfg_1.90_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.90_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I think we should include this os-prober upload in wheezy; it fixes a
messy grub.cfg parsing bug (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050774)
in the event that another operating system has
Heya Colin,
and thanks for that upload.
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org (17/09/2012):
I think we should include this os-prober upload in wheezy; it fixes a
messy grub.cfg parsing bug (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050774)
in the event that another operating system has GRUB 2.00
os-prober_1.56_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.56.dsc
os-prober_1.56.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.56_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.56_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
notfixed 682538 0.174/
fixed682538 cdebconf/0.174
thanks
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (17/09/2012):
close 682538 0.174
thanks
(and adding to changelog)
That led to:
| Found in version cdebconf/0.171
| Fixed in version 0.174/
Possibly fixing with the above commands (+ pinged
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 682538 0.174/
fixed682538 cdebconf/0.174
Bug #682538 {Done: Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org} [cdebconf]
cdebconf-text-udeb should provide a way to disable wrapping-around
The source cdebconf and version 0.174 do not appear to
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 17 Sep 2012 21:10:34 +0200, a écrit :
notfixed 682538 0.174/
fixed682538 cdebconf/0.174
thanks
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (17/09/2012):
close 682538 0.174
thanks
(and adding to changelog)
That led to:
| Found in version cdebconf/0.171
|
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (17/09/2012):
So the package name has to be put in the version? I have never seen it
documented, and couldn't find any reference about it, do you know any?
Your syntax was fine, according to the BTS's doc. I was pointed at
#686106, and Don confirmed it's a
Hi
I'll try to explain some of the decision as I have been working with
Sorina on this patch.
Joey Hess jo...@debian.org writes:
Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote:
For that matter, I would like to propose a patch to add support for
netcfg to write a Network Manager config file and modify the
Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org (17/09/2012):
When we added this code to netcfg during GSOC I first also feared that
and we even had our own very minimal UUID implementation at some
point. But we then found out that libuuid is already included in the
initrd because it's a dependency of
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:00:00 +
with message-id e1tdiqc-00013t...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#231003: fixed in netcfg 1.90
has caused the Debian Bug report #231003,
regarding Debian Installer does not work with IPv6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:00:00 +
with message-id e1tdiqc-00013t...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#231003: fixed in netcfg 1.90
has caused the Debian Bug report #231003,
regarding debian-installer: netinst CD doesn't support IPv6
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:00:00 +
with message-id e1tdiqc-00013t...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#231003: fixed in netcfg 1.90
has caused the Debian Bug report #231003,
regarding Should include IPv6 support from the beginning
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:00:00 +
with message-id e1tdiqc-00013t...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#231003: fixed in netcfg 1.90
has caused the Debian Bug report #231003,
regarding Please allow IPv6 addresses in manual configuration.
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:00:08 +
with message-id e1tdiqk-0001t8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#674560: fixed in os-prober 1.56
has caused the Debian Bug report #674560,
regarding A patch to add support for reading Fedora's grub2 config file
to be marked as done.
This
Hello,
I attempted, twice, to submit this by way of 'Bugreport', but it failed,
due to inflexibility if that programme, twice.
~~~
These are abstractions from a number of emails on the 'debian-user' list,
so please excuse the fact if they appear a little
Lennart,
am Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:37:12PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
It is only essential if your CPU has a microcode bug that affects you
AND your motherboard maker isn't providing useful bios updates AND you
don't apply bios updates.
So for a lot of people it is in fact not
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:32:30 +0200
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.90
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:02:29 +0100
Source: os-prober
Binary: os-prober-udeb os-prober
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.56
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:18:20 +0200
Source: rootskel-gtk
Binary: rootskel-gtk
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:44:12PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
From my point of view, localhost should be handled like any other
multi-homed host, that is, it should have both addresses. It might
have been different in 2010, wenn netcfg 1.57 was uploaded, but
nowadays applications really need
On Sep 17, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
True, but somehow I feel that freeze time is not the time to change this.
I disagree, netcfg should be fixed. There is plenty of time to look at
any fallback, and even reverting the change if needed.
This is 2012, Europe and Asia are out of IPv4
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 05:24:33PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[1]: Footer has Time of last build: Wed Aug 18 00:13:56 UTC 2010.
based on the date, I assume Frans was operating the build through a
crontab, which was probably disabled in the meanwhile. I think we should
be able to restore a
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:30:58PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 17, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
True, but somehow I feel that freeze time is not the time to change this.
I disagree, netcfg should be fixed. There is plenty of time to look at
any fallback, and even reverting the
Hello,
One of my co-maintainers for fonts changed the fonts-sil-abyssinica
package to use xz compression for *deb packages.
Is it OK to upload the package with such change, d-i wise? This is the
only change along with the drop of an empty directory in the package
(cruft left from ttf-* -
lowmem_1.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
lowmem_1.36.dsc
lowmem_1.36.tar.gz
lowmemcheck_1.36_i386.udeb
lowmem_1.36_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
lowmem_1.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_1.36.dsc
lowmem_1.36.tar.gz
lowmemcheck_1.36_i386.udeb
lowmem_1.36_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
54 matches
Mail list logo
