On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 13:58 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:25:55PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Hi,
(Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed)
3) I plan to split both large disks partitions into a small W8 part and
a larger Linux part. Should I do the split in W8 or
I have noticed this issue as well, and upon starting the installer removed
the usb device and procceded with the install as normal. when i got to the
bootloader and started installing it i quickly switched over to tty4 and
noticed that during the install its forcing it to be installed at /dev/sda
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-checker_1.25.dsc
cdrom-checker_1.25.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-checker_1.25.dsc
cdrom-checker_1.25.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
base-installer_1.132_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
base-installer_1.132.dsc
base-installer_1.132.tar.gz
base-installer_1.132_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.132_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com (15/05/2013):
I have noticed this issue as well, and upon starting the installer removed
the usb device and procceded with the install as normal. when i got to the
bootloader and started installing it i quickly switched over to tty4 and
noticed that
base-installer_1.132_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.132.dsc
base-installer_1.132.tar.gz
base-installer_1.132_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.132_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:22:02 +0200
Source: base-installer
Binary: base-installer bootstrap-base
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.132
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:45 +0200
Source: cdrom-checker
Binary: cdrom-checker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.25
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (12/05/2013):
Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of
15/16 June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point
release. Would that work for everyone?
I hope to have the d-i side in shape by then.
(Adding -boot@ for
Hi folks,
just to let you know, I've just committed some changes in git:
- jessie is the next target.
- current linux kernel is 3.8-1.
The netboot-gtk image can't be built right now because of speech
synthesis: espeakup-udeb isn't installable (#708353/#708357).
Hopefully that'll be fixed soon,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi folks,
just to let you know, I've just committed some changes in git:
- jessie is the next target.
- current linux kernel is 3.8-1.
The netboot-gtk image can't be built right now because of speech
synthesis: espeakup-udeb isn't installable
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (15/05/2013):
So, if, for some packages, it is not wished that they are built and
uploaded, please say so either in the list or in the changelog in
git.
Heh. I meant to send a few different status of mails. ;)
Since we're on that topic, I'm happy to see
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 08:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
The installation went well, thanks. The remaining problem is that W8
boot manager partition on the SSD /dev/sda2 has the boot flag set (not
changeable from Linux, is it from W8?)
I don't think this boot flag is meaningful on an
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 13:58 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 08:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
On the SSD the Linux partition
is /dev/sda5, which I made bootable (also UEFI boot). However, even if
grub is written to /dev/sda no grub menu appears, and only W8 starts
cdrom-detect_1.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.44.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.44.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
cdrom-detect_1.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.44.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.44.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 13:58 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 08:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
On the SSD the Linux partition
is /dev/sda5, which I made bootable (also UEFI boot). However, even if
grub
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:42:37 +0200
Source: cdrom-detect
Binary: cdrom-detect
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.44
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
cdebconf-entropy_0.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.tar.gz
cdebconf-text-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
Greetings,
cdebconf-entropy_0.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.tar.gz
cdebconf-text-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:38:00 +0200
Source: cdebconf-entropy
Binary: cdebconf-text-entropy cdebconf-newt-entropy cdebconf-gtk-entropy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
main-menu_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
main-menu_1.40.dsc
main-menu_1.40.tar.gz
main-menu_1.40_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
main-menu_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
main-menu_1.40.dsc
main-menu_1.40.tar.gz
main-menu_1.40_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:58:07PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
So installing grub (grub-efi-amd64) to /dev/sda (the EFI partition
is /dev/sda2) is the right thing to do? (to boot Linux, and then solve
the (eventually) missing Windows 8 entry in grub later)
I believe windows will stay in the
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:39:42AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
The installation went well, thanks. The remaining problem is that W8
boot manager partition on the SSD /dev/sda2 has the boot flag set (not
changeable from Linux, is it from W8?) On the SSD the Linux partition
is /dev/sda5, which
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
Can the problem be that the EFI partition containing W8 is /dev/sda2,
while I have been writing grub to /dev/sda and /dev/sda5 (Linux /)?
All EFI boot loaders are written
I'm not so sure about this, but it was necessary on my
machine.
For some reason (correct or not I don't know), 'grub-probe -t device /'
returns TWO entries:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sdb1
This on a ZFS filesystem, where those two are a mirror.
pool: system
state: ONLINE
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:10:25PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
I'm not so sure about this, but it was necessary on my
machine.
For some reason (correct or not I don't know), 'grub-probe -t device /'
returns TWO entries:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sdb1
This on a ZFS filesystem,
svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
Can the problem be that the EFI partition containing W8 is /dev/sda2,
while I have been writing grub to /dev/sda and /dev/sda5 (Linux /)?
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:44:49 +0200
Source: main-menu
Binary: main-menu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.40
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
efi-reader_0.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
efi-reader_0.12.dsc
efi-reader_0.12.tar.gz
efi-reader_0.12_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
efi-reader_0.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
efi-reader_0.12.dsc
efi-reader_0.12.tar.gz
efi-reader_0.12_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:36:54 +0200
Source: efi-reader
Binary: efi-reader
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
os-prober_1.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
os-prober_1.59.dsc
os-prober_1.59.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.59_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.59_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To
os-prober_1.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.59.dsc
os-prober_1.59.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.59_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.59_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:39:42AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
The installation went well, thanks. The remaining problem is that W8
boot manager partition on the SSD /dev/sda2 has the boot flag set (not
changeable from Linux, is it
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:36:49 +0200
Source: os-prober
Binary: os-prober-udeb os-prober
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.59
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
This one is very simple though. If '/target/boot/zfs' doesn't exist, create it.
The following changes since commit 17a4d0aa3f6341241d2244e5d71369e71e129e7f:
Make sure that 'grub-probe -t device XXX' only takes the first entry if
there's multiple (as if a mirror etc). (2013-05-15 17:46:16
netcfg_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
netcfg_1.110.dsc
netcfg_1.110.tar.gz
netcfg_1.110_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.110_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
netcfg_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.110.dsc
netcfg_1.110.tar.gz
netcfg_1.110_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.110_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:56:14 +0200
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.110
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
cdrom-retriever_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-retriever_1.29.dsc
cdrom-retriever_1.29.tar.gz
cdrom-retriever_1.29_all.udeb
load-cdrom_1.29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
cdrom-retriever_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-retriever_1.29.dsc
cdrom-retriever_1.29.tar.gz
cdrom-retriever_1.29_all.udeb
load-cdrom_1.29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To
partman-base_166_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-base_166.dsc
partman-base_166.tar.gz
partman-base_166_i386.udeb
partman-utils_166_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To
partman-base_166_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_166.dsc
partman-base_166.tar.gz
partman-base_166_i386.udeb
partman-utils_166_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:00:37 +0200
Source: cdrom-retriever
Binary: cdrom-retriever load-cdrom
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:10:25 +0200
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base partman-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 166
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Package: installation-guide
Severity: minor
Hi,
I just read something in the d-i manual in
Appendix C. Partitioning for Debian (see
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apcs01.html.en), which is
confusing:
Shortened to some words, it's like this:
Debian needs at least one partition for
Processing control commands:
fixed -1 1.92
Bug #693485 [keyboard-configuration] keyboard-configuration: XKBLAYOUT,
XKBOPTIONS values manually set in /etc/default/keyboard lost on upgrade
Marked as fixed in versions console-setup/1.92.
--
693485:
control: fixed -1 1.92
Hi,
I've upgraded keyboard-configuration from 1.88 to 1.92,
and the new version seemed to honor the configs
on upgrade (and on manual 'dpkg-reconfigure' too).
--- /etc/default/keyboard.bak
+++ /etc/default/keyboard
@@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
XKBMODEL=acer_laptop
XKBLAYOUT=us,ua,ru
Hi,
Brian Potkin claremont...@gmail.com wrote:
Some references:
http://www.debian.org/volatile/
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665852
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg00010.html
So with this patch Section 6.3.5.1 has had volatile
On 10 May 2013 04:41, Luca Capello l...@pca.it wrote:
Hi there!
On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:00:34 +0200, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
On 6 May 2013 06:04, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
The current default names for an LVM on LUKS setup are:
disk_crypt
host-root
host-swap_1
I would like
The di-netboot-assistant ubuntu sources are out of date.
Please add the latest and clean up the old (non-still-in-support-LTS)
ones.
(I'd have provided a patch, but I don't know what they are but
I am guessing an ubuntu person could fill them in quickly)
Thanks,
--
Matt Taggart
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:46 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
Thanks both of you for your help. I have now reinstalled wheezy. All
seems to go well again, even for grub-efi to install. Since I did not
get a question I assume the
Hi everyone,
On 15/05/13 13:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Since we're on that topic, I'm happy to see Colin and you upload
packages with pending changes in git. I don't think it makes sense
to target a release right now (eglibc + linux + other transitions
would make that hard if not impossible
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:46 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
Thanks both of you for your help. I have now reinstalled wheezy. All
seems to go well again, even for
Hi folks!
[ Feel free to forward this to people/derivatives using d-i and who
might be interested in joining the discussion; I intend to contact gtk
maintainers anyway once we reach a consensus, so that they know how
we're going to use their udebs. ]
With wheezy out, I finally looked at the
Hello,
Regis Boudin re...@boudin.name (15/05/2013):
On the cdebconf, although I haven't pushed anything for nearly a year,
mostly because of more house moving, crazy workload, and lack of good
enough Internet connection, I have a couple of patches that were
waiting for the jessie release.
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 16 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 16 00:05 buildd@barber
[I'm not subscribed, please CC me in reply]
I'm remastering the install CDs to do offline installs of a custom
package and its dependencies. I am updating the apt repository on the CD
to include the package and its dependencies. One of the dependencies
(libpng) has a data.tar.bz2 member in it.
Hi,
The first point release for wheezy (7.1) is scheduled for Saturday
June 15th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
62 matches
Mail list logo
