Re: Access to repos blocked

2016-03-07 Thread Rick Thomas
On Mar 6, 2016, at 11:12 PM, MH wrote: > Debian Jessie > > Recently ran into a problem with aptitude. I get the following message: > > E: The method driver /usr/lib/apt/methods/https could not be found > > Since I am not using ANY HTTPS repos, I should not be getting the

Bug#816682: live-installer: Inaccessible utility

2016-03-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Samuel Thibault (2016-03-08): > There was also a bug in at-spi2-atk, I have uploaded a fixed package. > > So, to summarize the needed steps to get d-i accessible from debian live: > > - at-spi2-atk fix (debian/patches/p2p), done. > - adding a udeb for libgail-common &

Bug#816682: live-installer: Inaccessible utility

2016-03-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, There was also a bug in at-spi2-atk, I have uploaded a fixed package. So, to summarize the needed steps to get d-i accessible from debian live: - at-spi2-atk fix (debian/patches/p2p), done. - adding a udeb for libgail-common & libgail18, filed as #816720 - setting

Bug#542899:

2016-03-07 Thread Chris Bainbridge
Does anyone have any comments on the man pages? If the pages are ok, can someone add them to the Debian package?

Re: Access to repos blocked

2016-03-07 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:18:47PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:12:59PM +0700, MH wrote: > > Recently ran into a problem with aptitude. I get the following message: > > > > E: The method driver /usr/lib/apt/methods/https could not be found > > > > Since I am not using

Re: Access to repos blocked

2016-03-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:12:59PM +0700, MH wrote: > Recently ran into a problem with aptitude. I get the following message: > > E: The method driver /usr/lib/apt/methods/https could not be found > > Since I am not using ANY HTTPS repos, I should not be getting the above > error. Are you

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

2016-03-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 13:07 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 12:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing > > both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD > > team seem happy

Re: Bad release in install documentation

2016-03-07 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió: > Hi, > > Holger Wansing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>> Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): Hello, a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: >

Processed: found 817023 in 1.65, tagging 817023

2016-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 817023 1.65 Bug #817023 [os-prober] os-prober doesn't detect EFI partition on MBR Marked as found in versions os-prober/1.65. > tags 817023 + patch Bug #817023 [os-prober] os-prober doesn't detect EFI partition on MBR Added tag(s) patch. >

Bug#817023: os-prober doesn't detect EFI partition on MBR

2016-03-07 Thread kay
Package: os-prober Version: 1.71 Also reproducible in os-prober 1.65 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/os-prober.git/tree/os-probes/mounted/x86/05efi#n42..n45 Disk has regular MBR table. It has Windows 7 and Ubuntu installed on different partitions. Os-prober doesn't detect EFI partition on

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

2016-03-07 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. > That would be fine indeed. While I think about, if recruting new