Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 28/11/2021 à 23:07, Adam Baxter a écrit : Maybe it'd be worth having an option to allow a user to tether a mobile phone via USB to grab the firmware online. This is automatic if the phone emulates a USB-ethernet adapter. Perhaps the prompt should say "We can download the firmware

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:57:37AM +1100, deb...@voltagex.org wrote: >Hi >>>At least GRUB itself was installed in the EFI partition. >>> Shouldn't there normally be EFI/boot/bootx64.efi? >>> >>>Not by default. It happens only if you choose to install a copy of the boot >>>loader in the

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Adam Baxter
> The installation manual provides all this information. OK, this is fair, I wasn't thinking about the manual as I've installed Debian quite a few times and know how the installation goes. Perhaps the text could include a reminder to check the manual for more info on firmware loading, or even a

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread debian
Hi >>At least GRUB itself was installed in the EFI partition. >> >>> Shouldn't there normally be EFI/boot/bootx64.efi? >> >>Not by default. It happens only if you choose to install a copy of the boot >>loader in the removable device path. The option is available only in expert >>install or after

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 28/11/2021 à 15:06, Steve McIntyre a écrit : On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Shouldn't there normally be EFI/boot/bootx64.efi? Not by default. It happens only if you choose to install a copy of the boot loader in the removable device path. The option is

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >Hello, > >Le 28/11/2021 à 12:28, Adam Baxter a écrit : >> >> Comments/Problems: >> Once the installer had finished and prompted me to reboot, the system came >> back up in Dell's hardware check mode and >> some investigation

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Hello, Le 28/11/2021 à 12:28, Adam Baxter a écrit : Comments/Problems: Once the installer had finished and prompted me to reboot, the system came back up in Dell's hardware check mode and some investigation revealed there was no UEFI boot entry for Debian. Some UEFI firmwares are broken and

Debian-boot , Alibaba 2021 most welcome golden prototyping supplier

2021-11-28 Thread Katherine
HiDebian-boot, How are you? We are pleased to learn from the Internet your distinguished company. And hope you will still think of mefor now, Katherine from Best Prototypes Manufacturing Co.,Ltd. Although we have not done business together formally cooperate with you until now, but you are

debootstrap_1.0.126+nmu1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2021-11-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:38:15 +0100 Source: debootstrap Architecture: source Version: 1.0.126+nmu1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Johannes Schauer Marin

Bug#998867: marked as done (debootstrap: --no-merged-usr became a no-op)

2021-11-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:03:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#998867: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.126+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #998867, regarding debootstrap: --no-merged-usr became a no-op to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.126+nmu1_source.changes

2021-11-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debootstrap_1.0.126+nmu1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.126+nmu1.dsc debootstrap_1.0.126+nmu1.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.126+nmu1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#998867: debootstrap: --no-merged-usr became a no-op

2021-11-28 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, the last maintainer action to this bug was 13 days ago, Adam Borowski points out how this breaks buildds, Julien Cristau explains how this change has undesired consequences elsewhere and it breaks my own package mmdebstrap. I saw no changes related to this bug in the development git

Bug#1000743: installation-reports: bootx64.efi didn't seem to get installed and no UEFI boot entry was created for Debian

2021-11-28 Thread Adam Baxter
Package: installation-reports Severity: important Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@voltagex.org (Please provide enough information to help the Debian maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling in the sections below.) Boot method: USB Image version: