Frans Pop a écrit :
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Those flavours will replace the qemu flavour that will be removed in
kernel 2.6.24, now that QEMU emulates real hardware correctly.
OK. In that case does it make sense to clean up the existing QEMU support
after Malta
no
reason for that. Either mklibs is still broken on mips, or images are
generated with the old buggy mklibs.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED
/partman/partman-partitioning/debian/changelog (révision 50853)
+++ packages/partman/partman-partitioning/debian/changelog (copie de
travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+partman-partitioning (56) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * disk-label.sh: add support for MIPS Malta platform.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno
yet
12:16 tbm I'd just ask for commit access :)
12:16 aurel32 who should I ask?
12:17 tbm not sure; send an email to the list
12:17 aurel32 ok, will do
Could somebody arrange that?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer
[Cc:ed debian-boot as both packages have a udeb]
Hi,
libusb and usbutils are ready to go into testing, but they are currently
blocked because they have a .udeb package. Could you please hint them?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian
on libgcc1/libgcc2/libgcc4, but
unfortunately I am not sure there is another way to fix that.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The package linux-2.6 version 2.6.18-5 will add the QEMU flavour on mips
and mipsel.
debian-installer is working correctly under QEMU, but it tells that it
doesn't know the type of partition type on this architecture. The
attached
and testing is different.
The solution is to rewrite the postinst of tzdata + tzconfig using debconf.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED
with your very tight size constraints.
Note that the patch has been almost accepted upstream, in a bit
different version. The changes are on the #ifdef and the resulting C
code is the same.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer
in /proc somewhere that disables the debugging)?
Well I have looked at the code, the debugging messages are printed using
printk(), and their inclusion or not in the final code is done by
preprocessor options (#ifdef #endif).
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
people from d-i to know if the gain in space is
really important for etch.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
After a discussion with Joey Hess and later with Frans Pop at Debconf
6, we have decided that it could be a good idea to have a udeb glibc
built with -Os.
I have made a few tests, mainly on i386 and amd64
Sven Luther a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:47:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Well that could be done, but that does not really change the problem, I
mean a glibc with -Os has still to be built, which seems to cause some
problems as describe in my previous mail.
Does it cause
Joey Hess wrote:
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I manage to build smaller udebs for the glibc. I built it with -Os, and
disabled support for 2.4 kernels. On i386, the gain is 124kB on the
udebs size and 260kB on the installed size.
Currently it is built in a dirty way by doing that on the main
Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:06:15AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
As told to some of us on IRC, I have installed a Debian on a dual
dual-core Opteron machine, using the graphical installer (but the
problem does not look specific to it).
The installed kernel was the k8
Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:17:18PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I know the difference between the two, but that's actually the only
difference in dmidecode between single-core and dual-core CPUs.
An AMD system spits out a hyperthreading message?
That's how
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
[snip]
Handle 0x0004, DMI type 4, 35 bytes
Processor Information
Sorry for having closed this bug, I have looked to a bug number too
quickly and put a wrong number in my changelog.
It should be now be reopened.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineering Student
`. `' [EMAIL
Le Lundi 15 Juillet 2002 02:04, vous avez écrit :
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
I have a bug report to add mozilla-locale-fr to the French task.
The problem I see, is that installing the French task will install
mozilla, which is maybe not was is wanted by people installing the
French task
Hello,
I am not sure it is the right place to ask that, but I have been told
that on #debian-devel.
I have a bug report to add mozilla-locale-fr to the French task. The
problem I see, is that installing the French task will install mozilla,
which is maybe not was is wanted by people
201 - 221 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
