I've committed a change that should make stable updates (and also uploads
to testing) easier.
From the SVN commit:
snip
For builds targeted at testing or stable, set USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES in
debian/rules to include udebs from the corresponding proposed-updates
suite. For details see build/README.
On Friday 06 November 2009, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote:
I want to install lenny with the 'squeeze' installer.
Are you saying all I need to preseed is suite=lenny on the boot line?
Yep.
BUT I doubt anyone has tested that the squeeze installer really still is
compatible with lenny. The
On Monday 02 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
The existing templates for the four main questions in localechooser all
have problems: they cause Lintian warnings and don't really help the
user with what he's doing.
Below a proposed patch to improve them. The patch also includes the
changes
On Friday 06 November 2009, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
I noticed a small discrepancy in the type for this question.
packages/netcfg/debian/netcfg-dhcp.template says:
Template: netcfg/dhcp_timeout
Type: text
Description: for internal use; can be preseeded
Timeout for trying DHCP
Hi Samuel and Holger,
Sorry for not looking at this BR earlier, but somehow I don't think booting
from DOS is the highest priority we have.
I've looked at the patch from Holger (as that's the most extensive of the
two), but have some problems with it. My comments below.
Cheers,
FJP
On Saturday
tag 532437 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
http://debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en
says under 4.3.2.2. Adding the installer image that the name of the
kernel file is vmlinuz.
However,
tag 532440 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
but when I tried to boot from the usb stick I got the error message
no bootable partition found. I ran cfdisk and noticed that indeed
bootable flag indeed is not set. Shouldn't the manual mention that?
I've added a
tag 548534 pending
thanks
On Saturday 26 September 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
A colleague wanted to install Debian by starting the debian installer
from a USB stick. Reading sections install-methods/boot-usb-files.xml
and install-methods/downloading-files.xml, he went for the
second
On Saturday 17 October 2009, Alex Brotman wrote:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch01s02.html.en
contains a link to Kernel Traffic which actually goes to a website
having nothing to do with kernels. The installation guides for other
architectures have the same 'broken' link.
On Friday 30 October 2009, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
In relation to #552787, I've attempted to improve the relevant text
in the preseeding appendix of the manual. It's a bit wordier (sorry
translators).
The parameter classnamemirror/udeb/suite/classname determines the suite
+for additional
On Friday 06 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Found the problem, which is documented but it's somewhat difficult
to parse. This change in my preseed file fixed the issue:
- d-i mirror/udeb/suite string lenny
+ d-i mirror/udeb/suite string testing
This is not a bug. If you
First of all, sorry for the late reply.
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, M.-A. DARCHE wrote:
The problem now is that I cannot recover/restore my USB stick to its
previous state. Before me installing the Debian installer on it, the USB
capacity (size) was 2Gb and now when I open the USB device with
On Friday 06 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Actually, I suspect that you had an old daily image (which is based on
*unstable*) that still used the 2.6.31-1 kernel while the udebs for that
kernel no longer existed in unstable because they had been updated to
2.6.31-2.
Eh, we don't have udebs
On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Well, OK, I'm not entirely convinced but I apparently can't propose a
sufficiently correct alternative to makje you change your mind..:-)
Here's an alternative I could live with:
The country selected here will be used for example to
On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Maelvon HAWK wrote:
Wanted to install a stable Debian version on a Vaio (PCG-GRT816S) with
XPE and a netboot, I've been faced to a similar bug as #497212!
The screen turn black!
When exactly does it turn black? After you boot the installer from the
syslinux
On Tuesday 03 November 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
I'd just recommend Please select which is the style we generally
push in dle reviews (avoid imperative form).
Using the imperative form is wrong in the *short* description (which
tag 534413 pending
thanks
On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
In hw-detect.sh there are two locations where the script checks if
/sys/bus/usb exists, but usbfs will no longer be available in kernel
2.6.31, so another method will need to be found.
Actually, we use /proc/bus/usb in one
On Monday 02 November 2009, Frode Severin Hatlevik wrote:
2009/11/2 Clint Adams sch...@debian.org:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Frode Severin Hatlevik wrote:
The problem: When I install Debian and choose Norwegian locale I get
a language soup of Norwegian, Sweedish, Danish and
On Monday 02 November 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
--- a/packages/localechooser/debian/localechooser.templates-in
+++ b/packages/localechooser/debian/localechooser.templates-in
@@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ Template: debian-installer/locale
Type: select
Choices: ${LOCALELIST}
# :sl2:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm currently preparing the patches to drop the arches alpha and m68k
from the Installation Guide. The plan is to update both the English
version and all translations. The changes are not huge, but they affect
a fairly large number of files
incomplete).
Test images (i386) this time that use the new templates and include the
change for #552560 (use expert mode!) are available at:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/madduck/
Cheers,
FJP
commit 330cff17ef17481bc98d8b80656f12984017e10a
Author: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Date: Sun Nov 1 17:19
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
I've just tried building netcfg on s390, but that fails with:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 's390' does not
appear in package's architecture list (i386 sparc alpha m68k arm
armel armeb powerpc mips mipsel hppa ia64
tag 316006 pending
thanks
This was indirectly implemented for Lenny (or maybe even earlier): tzsetup
depends on localechooser, so users get asked to select a country before
that point.
However, I think it's time to just include localechooser in the s390
initrds so that the selected country
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The reason for adding a symlink /usr/local/etc/ - /etc/ can be found
in this mail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/10/msg00111.html. I.e, it
avoids noise that may confuse users.
I don't see anything in that email tht
No longer really relevant, but just for completeness.
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I don't think so. A udeb can usually ignore bits about policy
that talk about packaging details. However, when it comes to stuff on
the disk that is going to outlast the
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
While testing 2.6.32-rc5 on my Sun Ultra 10 (sparc), I noticed the
following change in the boot messages:
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
-console handover: boot [earlyprom0] - real [tty0]
+console [tty0] enabled, bootconsole disabled
Just
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
No part of a udeb ever ends up on the disk. Udebs only life in the
installer intrds and in the ramdisk set up by the initrd. I don't think
the FHS should apply to the ramdisk environment of the installer.
Well, I think it's good to follow
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Geronimo Ma. Hernandez wrote:
There are several ways to get info about hardware:
- files in /sys or /proc
- utilities like lspci, lsusb, dmidecode (not all available in D-I)
I see. So I have to do the detection on myself and add the tools I need
for that to
reopen 552560
thanks
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009.10.27.2305 +0100]:
You can choose en_GB if you install in expert mode (or with
priority=medium). I don't think we want to set defaults for unofficial
languages
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
No, I can *add* the en_GB locale later. I cannot chose it as system
default, and I tried expert mode.
Sorry, you are correct. Reopening.
A possible solution could be to invert the two expert questions: first ask
which extra locales to install
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
- write an en_CH locale and convince glibc maintainers to include it
in locales
That is very much the least preferred solution, and, even if it were
accepted in libc, I would be in favor of excluding it (at least from the
shortlist for
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
That's actually quite simple to implement and even simplifies the code
quite a bit.
Martin, Christian: please give this image a try.
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/madduck/
Eh, sorry. This is broken. Please ignore for now
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
No, I can *add* the en_GB locale later. I cannot chose it as system
default, and I tried expert mode.
Sorry, you are correct. Reopening.
A possible solution could be to invert the two expert
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
A possible solution could be to invert the two expert questions: first
ask which extra locales to install and then offer to select a default
from the selected locales.
That's actually quite simple
I've just tried building netcfg on s390, but that fails with:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 's390' does not
appear in package's architecture list (i386 sparc alpha m68k arm
armel armeb powerpc mips mipsel hppa ia64 amd64 lpia kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64)
The debian-boot list is more appropriate for this question. Please reply to
that list and not to debian-cd.
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Geronimo Ma. Hernandez wrote:
I read the wiki of DebianInstaller and DebianCustomCD, as well as
debian installer internals, but I stil didn't get rid of how
Damn, it looked like such a nice idea.
Today I committed a change to set a different menu item number for
localechooser for s390 so that it gets run after network-console instead
of when we only have the text frontend available.
This worked great, but only now do I realize that localechooser
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Justification: The package installs a file in /usr/local/... which is
not allowed.
As this is a udeb I think this can be ignored.
The reason for adding a symlink /usr/local/etc/ - /etc/ can be found in
this mail:
Package: installation-report
Version: 2.38
The utility dfbinfo used to be included in the libdirectfb udeb in
/usr/lib/libdirectfb-*/bin/.
In Lenny the utility has been split out into a separate package
libdirectfb-bin and moved to /usr/bin, and as a result of that is no
longer included in the
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
Since debconf-get-selections is not the appropriate way to create
preseed.cfg files, but d-i should know what keys to save (or not to
save), why not extend d-i so that it automatically drops
a preseed.cfg file into /root (next to the
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
The live-installer source package not only has a udeb, but also a deb.
This means that it must also have a Standards-Version field in
debian/control. Only source packages that have *only* udebs are allowed
to omit that field.
When this is fixed
Ian Campbell wrote:
Is there a way to contact the build machine maintainers? Other than
hoping they read this thread?
The overview shows who they are. Ping on IRC, private mail, ...
Note that the powerpc issue is not for the buildd admin (although it's
possible that needs updating too).
--
Hi,
I'm currently preparing the patches to drop the arches alpha and m68k from
the Installation Guide. The plan is to update both the English version and
all translations. The changes are not huge, but they affect a fairly large
number of files.
If you have pending changes, then please commit
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
The second category is named error and the tags listed can not be
Looks like it's named nowayout.
overridden. Those are tags corresponding to packaging errors serious
enough to mark a package unfit for the archive and should never happen.
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Now, in this case there is no need to move it, as looking at
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-standards-version-field.html shows
that we do not see any of the D-I packages, so I assume lintian is
detecting it properly and we do not need to move
Package: live-installer
Version: 13
Severity: serious
The live-installer source package not only has a udeb, but also a deb. This
means that it must also have a Standards-Version field in debian/control.
Only source packages that have *only* udebs are allowed to omit that field.
--
To
Thanks for making an effort to look into this.
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
Thanks. I still cannot reproduce so I am somewhat clutching at straws. I
compared the logs for a local (successful) i386 run of the daily-build
script vs. the logs from
On Monday 26 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
If you cannot reproduce it with an up-to-date sid build environment then
it's quite possible that the buildds are simply outdated.
apt and dpkg are not really relevant here. More relevant are versions of
mklibs itself and packages like binutils
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I tried downgrading binutils, as you suggested in your next mail, to
2.19.91.20091006-1 from testing and still saw no issues.
Hmmm. Another option is that it's due to a libc version skew.
During a build libc6 is copied from the host system
On Monday 26 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
After updating the system the problem disappears. So, that confirms the
reason is outdated buildd environments after an API change in libc (2.9
- 2.10). The first 2.10 upload was 18 Okt, so the problem should be
only about a week old.
s/API/ABI
Package: hw-detect
Version: 1.73
Severity: serious
During a D-I build on armel I noticed the following:
Unpacking udev-udeb (from udebs/udev-udeb.udeb) ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
trying to overwrite '/lib/udev/firmware.agent', which is also in package
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I was unable to reproduce in an uptodate i386 sid chroot. I'm not sure
which environment these builds occur, maybe it's a testing thing?
No, daily images get build in a sid environment.
powerpc is failing differently with
E: Couldn't
I have just committed two changes to the daily-build-aggregator script [1]:
1) drop alpha and remove commented entry for m68k;
2) one-time rename old statistics file in order to reset them.
Dropping alpha could possibly have been postponed for some time, but it
made sense to do it now because of
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I only checked the first failure for each arch but this same failure
seems to have effected mips (build_r4k-ip22_cdrom), s390 (build_generic)
and armel (uild_iop32x_netboot_glantank).
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have not been
any builds at all since early July. It looks as if some of the central
D-I buildds are simply not being managed.
Wrong, ssh is/was broken on mips* so
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have not
been any builds at all since early July. It looks as if some of the
central D-I buildds are simply not being
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Wrong, ssh is/was broken on mips* so the results did not get uploaded,
but the builds were not interrupted.
I guess you're referring to #538313?
That bug was fixed on Okt 5, but the current situation, 20 days later, is
that we still don't have daily
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Holger Wansing wrote:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
Without additional information I see no reason to change the current
text. In what circumstances would it be better to use a swap file over
a swap partition and why?
Maybe only change the text a bit
On Saturday 24 October 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
CD team, this bug apparently confirms that weekly builds of Debian
testing images are broken (maybe some of them only, I'm not sure). You
guys probably know more than me about this, but isn't there something
we could do to redirect our
Package: rootskel
Version: 1.81
Severity: important
Currently reopen-console-linux has the following code:
# If the kernel emitted a handover message, then it's the one
console=$(dmesg -s 65535 |
sed -n -e 's/.*\] console handover: boot \[.*\] - real
\[\(.*\)\]$/\1/p')
While
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Links to current images are available from:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Cheers,
FJP
Hmmm... If I follow that link, then click on
• netinst ... and businesscard ... CD
On Monday 19 October 2009, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
El 19/10/2009 a las 13:57 escribiste:
Hi, in lenny installation guide C.1 [1] we can read :
By putting swap on a separate partition, Linux can make much more
efficient use of it. It is possible to force Linux to use a regular
file as
On Friday 23 October 2009, Alex Andryushkin wrote:
If install goes quickly, then it appears to be OK. However, if there is
large file system is being created (e.g. took 1/2 hour to create
encrypted one),
or I just leave install unattended for some time, then install process
forgets that CD is
On Friday 16 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
I have finally resolved and merged a bunch of patch I had for
di-netboot-assistant.
Please mark the changelog as UNRELEASED when you start on a new version
to make it clear to others using the SVN repo that there are changes that
have not been
Looks to me that the general state of builds is rather pathetic ATM:
Sorry. I should have just written Looks like there are quite a few
problems with builds ATM. Does not change the facts or the likelyhood of
a successful upload/release any time soon though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thursday 15 October 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I have just given a try, and during the installation, there is an error
message about security.debian.org not having support for kfreebsd. The
installation continues anyway, but it may confuse our users.
Any opinion on that?
Simple. Get the
On Thursday 15 October 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[1] #345251, #377391, #382689, #470374
I'm surprised these bug reports are so old. Obviously this is not a
new issue, but I'm pretty sure that it occurs much more often now than
it did in the past. I cannot remember running into the
On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Brian Szymanski wrote:
Maybe I'm just sad that alpha is being dropped for squeeze, but... It
strikes me that not having install docs will be a major hindrance to any
revival of the alpha port, as it will discourage potential new
developers from ever trying debian
On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Brian Szymanski wrote:
As far as the burden on translators goes, is there a priority ranking
system for what needs to be done? Seems like that could help here...
Sorry, I misread that comment.
Yes
On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
Let me see if I've got this right...
The installer being based on (e.g.) Sid/unstable means that the
active components of the installer CDs (the parts that do the
installing, not the parts that will be installed) come from the
current
On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Note that we don't really use the D-I images for unstable on the
mirrors. (With one exception: the sid_d-i daily built CD images; but
those are only used during a *very* short window for pre-release
testing, and recently that has just been skipped
Now that we have two architectures that are no longer official release
architectures I've been wondering if we should remove any architecture-
specific text for them from the Installation Guide.
m68k was dropped as a release architecture for Etch, and alpha is being
dropped for Squeeze. For
On Monday 12 October 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I reported this issue in May and it's still there. Other people have
seen it too. It doesn't matter whether you install to SATA, USB or MMC.
This error doesn't show up all the time, but it shows up quite
regularly. This is definitely a
tag 471505 pending
thanks
On Friday 09 October 2009, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
Any news on this bug? Lenny has been released long time ago, and squeeze
is not frozen yet so fixing it now won't be risky.
Also see the related Ubuntu bug:
On Saturday 10 October 2009, Tatsu wrote:
i'am searching for a HowTo or a reference manual which describe the way
to create a new installer package (udeb?) with support for the new
GUI-Interface included.
That question does not really make sense. The graphical installer is
supported by
Please reply to the BR, even if it is closed.
On Saturday 10 October 2009, you wrote:
One question:
where can i find actual versions of vmlinuz and initrd.gz?
From the daily build D-I images on [1]. The raw installer images for all
installation methods can be found under other images.
Do I
On Monday 05 October 2009, fserra...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried to install with Debian-503-amd64-DVD-1, and during
console-data instalation, it tried to use busybox; but busybox is not
in the 1º DVD. Can any help me, please?
According to this search [1] the package _is_ included on DVD 1,
On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
The meeting still happened (thanks to Luk and Otavio) and as usual,
the logs are available from
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
Not Found
The requested URL /debian-boot.2009-10-05-20.07.log.html was not found on
this
On Saturday 26 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
It still means that the cleanup will take quite a bit longer than the
planned 4 hours. I'm leaving the current dump+load stage running while I
catch some sleep (after more than an hour it's now at revision 12875 out
of 55900).
alioth is still
On Friday 25 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm going to have another try at the cleanup [1] of the D-I SVN
repository tonight.
This means that starting 22:00 UTC committing changes to the Debian
Installer subversion repository will not be possible.
I expect the repository to be available
Hi,
I'm going to have another try at the cleanup [1] of the D-I SVN repository
tonight.
This means that starting 22:00 UTC committing changes to the Debian
Installer subversion repository will not be possible.
I expect the repository to be available again about 4 hours later, but
please wait
On Friday 25 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
- partman components are very tightly coupled
Very frequently changes, such as adding ext4 support, requires
making related changes to multiple components. Being able to do so in
a single branch
reassign 548369 upgrade-reports
thanks
Please keep me in CC when replying!
On Friday 25 September 2009, Hodge, Robert L wrote:
Description: eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
Upgraded lenny on s390 to squeeze on s390, and upon rebooted received
the following messages.
On Friday 25 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm going to have another try at the cleanup [1] of the D-I SVN
repository tonight.
This means that starting 22:00 UTC committing changes to the Debian
Installer subversion repository will not be possible.
I expect the repository to be available
Let me start with a request to other team members: PLEASE join this
discussion. Think about how *you* use the repository; consider whether you
are confortable with git or not; think about the issues raised both by
Joey and me; and *give your opinion*.
I hate the fact that this looks to be
Given the team meeting this evening I guess this is my last chance to
comment. The main reason I haven't so far is that I find myself simply
caring less and less, but well.
I really have only one argument against the switch to git: the splitting of
the repository into multiple separate
reassign 546834 util-linux 2.16-3
severity 546834 serious
affects 546834 debootstrap
tags 546834 d-i
thanks
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Tak Auyeung wrote:
lh_build failed and stopped in debootstrap phase. lh_build is set up to
use sid for both bootstrap and chroot. Attached please find a
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be
converted to using initramfs?
Actually, I don't see how this can work today since ext2 is a module...
Has anyone tested that these work in lenny?
There are no floppy
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
So why can't all of the the lenny/squeeze installations be done with
the kernel from etch or even sarge? This would seem to be completely
within the jurisdiction of the installer team. Am I missing
something?
1) Because it still needs to be
(No need to CC me on replies.)
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
Nah. The whole point is to support legacy systems that are capable of
_running_ the newest software, but whose peripheral suite is not
adequte to _bootstrap_ the larger images. is it your belief that the
user debian-boot@lists.debian.org
usertags 541831 sparc
tags 541831 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Stephen,
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
It sounds like the rsc console is something different, which could
explain what you saw. Maybe we
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Yep, I know about that post, but I'm not sure whether that's related or
not. AFAIK that issue was about having no console output at all, not
about incorrect configuration of the installed system.
Well, the second part of the mail is this issue
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
FWIW, I've been pointed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2009/04/msg00024.html . The follow
up suggests it may already have some fixes in? It's possible I may not
have gotten the r1 image, although I thought I was using the latest
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I contacted the listmasters on IRC, and they removed the messages.
Excellent! Thanks a lot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
to ;-))
Hmmm? Never heard of the BTS? ;-)
was that I wanted a partial mirror of main+contrib of testing
but just main/debian-installer of sid. I wanted this so that I can
tags 545584 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
Chapter 6.3.1.3. Choosing a Keyboard
(run kbdconfig as root after you have completed the installation).
Fixed for original and translations. Thanks Tapio!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
The command I use is
pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --variant=buildd --basetgz base.tgz
I do not know how it translats in term of debootstrap.
That's not even very relevant. Just try creating a standard chroot:
# debootstrap sid target
On Monday 07 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Have you made some progress here? During the team meeting today, there
is a rough consensus that we should move on but all of us agreed that
you could have interesting comments and, even if they aren't as
polished as you would like to, it
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
[1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD
images using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the
docs and tools directories :-)
Would you please describe what is left that the new version of
debmirror will
On Saturday 05 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
A compromise seems to be adding an english task with
iamerican so that *all* en_* installs have iamerican, ispell and d-c
(en_GB would then have ibritish and iamerican).
Another option would be dropping the british task and use iamerican
701 - 800 of 6277 matches
Mail list logo
