eal boot, when init fires up iscsid daemon, it'll take over those
connections and do the necessary housekeeping thenceforth.
This is all around 8 years old setup knowledge across distributions.
Not sure what the current approach is.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Univer
On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 17:37 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2021-05-15):
> > Yes. That scsi-modules support bites back now. I just forgot about
> > it
> > completely. My intent was to not duplicate another architecture
> > list
> in
> > d/rul
ment
to support/test it, nor the necessary hands-on knowledge if a bug is
reported. But derivatives may have a dependency on it.
The current easy fix, as Cyril mentioned above, it to revert it back to
the previous architecture list and adapt the same in d/rules in target
override_dh_makeshlibs.
-
package (udeb) used by debian-installer.
19:33 ♒ ॐ ♅ ♄ ⛢ ☺
On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 04:32 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2021-04-30):
> > The upload I prepped failed on some of the architectures.
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 21:20 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> How would you like to see this fixed Cyril ?
>
> The easiest option, if d-i supports, would be to extend architecture
> list to: `linux-any`, keeping it in line with what the actual open-
> iscsi package supports.
to: `linux-any`, keeping it in line with what the actual open-
iscsi package supports.
On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 13:36 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> Thank you. I find your reworded comment proper and have applied the
> same.
>
> I will now work with the release team.
>
applied the
same.
I will now work with the release team.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
0 iSCSI.
.
This is the minimal package (udeb) used by debian-installer.
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
From b98d26b860ef7c989438d2641eaa5d2c514d2b51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Date: Wed, 28 Apr
then I can prepare an upload just dropping these.
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
vice based mounts, such
as iSCSI), in which case _netdev may be added to the mount
option string of the unit, which forces systemd to consider the mount
unit a network mount.
So, by specifying _netdev, we are just making it more explicit.
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 17:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Ritesh,
>
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@researchut.com> (2018-01-19):
> > I'll only be able to be at my computer next week. So you may go
> ahead
> > with the binnmu.
>
> Thanks for your answer, binN
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 08:51 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > The solution is for people to configure a bridge or Open vSwitch (OVS)
> > in /etc/network/interfaces. (Notice OVS can be configured[4] in the
> > interfaces file). Maybe it would be useful to offer one or both of
> > these options at
ort. So if we were to
add it, I'd recommend we keep it inline with the standard settings.
I just now, again, checked the defaults in multipath, and user_friendly_name is
set to off, by default. So, if we are using friendly names in D-I, then we'll
have 2 files to take care of, multipath.conf and
rstand why multipath is part of the debian installer when it
> is a well known fact that the disk-detect, multipath and partman-multipath
> udebs can not work together.
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
s and drawbacks.
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAliLCSwACgkQpjpYo/Lh
dWlEDw/+PmG0NbqI13pKSBbbXXWhtKSyJGuqyzaMCdGGUIeo7aXwu+YKVUZ3TZvU
3xN
ipath will work in stretch.
In base multipath-tools packages, we've always recommended using persistent WWID
names instead of friendly names. They are unique and are always the same. The
simplest for D-I should be to just drop friendly names for multipathed devices.
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://pe
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.87
Severity: important
Here's a case. debootstrap operation has failed. Now debootstrap
mentions to look at the logs to determine the cause of the failure. But
this log file is inside the chroot. The same chroot that debootstrap
removes as part of cleanup,
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.86
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
For some additional context, please also have a look at the pbuilder
bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432088
Given debootstrap is used in creating a debian chroot rootdir, it
downloads the .debs on
e error i gone, there
> are other problems then, but i will make a separate bugreport on that. (it is
> another package)
As you mentioned, this was fixed long back. The D-I team would have noticed and
reported it, if the udeb had such a dependency. I've CCed them. Let's see if
they have any poi
> and you can't rely on that in your multipath udeb.
Hmmm... I'll look into it later. But when you say "No systemd in d-i",
does it mean that is how it is going to remain ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the diff ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
no systemd in d-i (and likely won't be).
Thank you for this information. So how do we proceed here ?
Should I drop the systemd support for now ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ
. The more it is delayed, the lesser
testing it gets, if any.
On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:48 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (29/07/2012):
Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ?
That, plus I still haven't
Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ?
On Friday 13 July 2012 01:35 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Any updates of this exception request?
On Tuesday 10 July 2012 08:57 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Colin,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (10/07/2012):
Now that the old (2.0.873-1
On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (29/07/2012):
Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ?
That, plus I still haven't heard back from Colin.
Okay!! I hope he responds back soon. Otherwise please let me know your
secondary plan of action
Any updates of this exception request?
On Tuesday 10 July 2012 08:57 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Colin,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (10/07/2012):
Now that the old (2.0.873-1) version of the udeb has been removed, and
the newer limited architecture udebs are ready in unstable
Hello Release and Boot Team,
Now that the old (2.0.873-1) version of the udeb has been removed, and
the newer limited architecture udebs are ready in unstable, this email
is a request for freeze exception (including udeb freeze exception) for
the open-iscsi package.
The current excuses reported
unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
* Updating open-iscsi fixes old bugs: #645752
http://bugs.debian.org/645752
* Valid candidate
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.ukwrote:
On 25.06.2012 13:56, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
This is holding open-iscsi's propagation to Wheezy. Please advise
what should be done.
Well, fixing:
* open-iscsi-udeb/armel unsatisfiable Depends: scsi
Only pm-utils does power savings. And so does lmt. Others are reporting
tools or tools that can trigger.
On Nov 9, 2011 1:17 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Ritesh Raj Sarraf (r...@debian.org):
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.07
Severity: wishlist
laptop-mode-tools
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.07
Severity: wishlist
laptop-mode-tools is a power saving tool for linux. It would be good to
see laptop-mode-tools installed when a user selects the Laptop task.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'),
system shouldn't be
referred using UUID.
From my experience, referring device mapper devices by their device IDs has
worked very reliably and persistently in all cases.
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
Necessity is the mother of invention.
signature.asc
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
I'll be skipping the Package-Specific Info section because this bug is
being filed from my laptop and not the server where the issue was seen.
I used the official Lenny Multi-arch netinst cd image and booted.
Installation went fine and just then
Package: libdebian-installer4
Version: 0.58
Severity: wishlist
File: debian-installer
Add iscsi root installation feature to debian installer. Later, once FCoE
initiators are available, we might need one for that too. So there could be
much common code for it. As an add-on, add multipathed
34 matches
Mail list logo
