(No Subject)

Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS

Bug#983494: (no subject)

I've seen this in a fresh virt-manager bookworkm VM, uninstalling arch-test did the trick

Bug#1057145: (no subject)

What command are you using to run debootstrap? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1032530: (no subject)

If that's the case then this is working as intended. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#694886: (no subject)

This is an old one! Does this still occur? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#731859: (no subject)

Working on this, will update soon. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#983494: (no subject)

I've never seen this. Is it fixed? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#940183: (no subject)

This looks like a bug in Fedora, possibly in their implementation of binutils. Can you try again and report back? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#974084: (no subject)

The merge request has a pending question. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#935334: (no subject)

So how, exactly, does this cause an issue? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Hi, On 2024-01-31 09:15, Ken Sharp wrote: Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place? the bts is the correct place but debootstrap is maintained by unpaid volunteers like many other open source projects. So getting your patch merged depends on somebody finding

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#594052: (no subject)

This seems unnecessary for debootstrap. Can this be closed? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1032530: (no subject)

Is /tmp/jammy definitely an empty directory? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Okay, okay, I made a real mess of that. Just to clarify: - I mixed up output from Debian and Ubuntu. But the result is the same in both cases. - Turns out I've attached the patch four times. I apologise. I have learned. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Attached is the patch. It wouldn't attach from the terminal for some reason. diff --git a/functions b/functions index 1924e89..f5de832 100644 --- a/functions +++ b/functions @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ while (read STDIN, $x, 1) { }' "$@" elif [ "$1" = "GETDEPS" ]; then local pkgdest="$2";

Re: Bug#1034117: (no subject)

Hi, Andrew M.A. Cater (2023-04-09): > That does depend: if you set up from a DVD with no network, then that > may be the result. If you have a working network, then the installer > should offer you the option to include a network mirror. That's a bug report, so both the submitter and the bug

Re: Bug#1034117: (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +, Julian Groß wrote: > Turns out that this is an “assumption” problem and not a bug. > > I assumed that the default behaviour would be to set up sources. > Turns out that the default behaviour of the installer is to *not* set up the > sources, but only set

Bug#1034117: (no subject)

Turns out that this is an “assumption” problem and not a bug. I assumed that the default behaviour would be to set up sources. Turns out that the default behaviour of the installer is to *not* set up the sources, but only set up the installation media as a source. Having the option for that

Bug#1024720: (No Subject)

Similar issue on system that have already an Ubuntu system installed. Each time I try to boot on an USB key with Debian 11 Iso, I get the grub text prompt straight, nothing else ! If I zap all Ubuntu OS partitions on the existing HD in computer, then the Debian USB key boots normally ;)

Bug#849400: (no subject)

This affects me, too. And it's really weird that it doesn't work, because the live installer (calamares) manages this setup just fine. It's the recommended setup there, actually. -- Niklas (see also bug #858009)

subject

This is the body

Bug#994743: (no subject)

Just checked Trisquel GNU/Linux behaviour. Installed latest Triskel (KDE variation) in VM, results: $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration [sudo] password for pioruns: Your console font configuration will be updated the next time your system boots. If you want to update it now, run

Bug#994743: Info received ((no subject))

This is my discussion about this problem on Debian mail list: https://linux.debian.user.narkive.com/naFOIjLq/colemak-layout-at-boot-time

Bug#994743: (no subject)

This bug is related to two console-setup bug reports: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696773 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696774 -- With kindest regards, Piotr. ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org ⠈⠳⣄

Processed: Re: Bug#990876: (no subject)

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 grub-efi-amd64 Bug #990876 [installation-reports] Installation fails: "Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed." Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'grub-efi-amd64'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #990876 to the same

Bug#990876: (no subject)

Control: reassign -1 grub-efi-amd64 Hi Julian, On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 09:45:04AM +, Julian Groß wrote: >I just tried installing without changing the default partition table and just >telling the installer to use the whole disk. Also fails on installing grub, but >this time with a slightly

Bug#926539: (no subject)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351968 suggests looking up the console by major:minor instead of name when using /proc/consoles, would it be possible to have debian-installer do that? At the very least, it'd be nice to have some kind of workaround available, like specifying the

Bug#967896: (no subject)

Same issue here on HP Envy x360 cn1002ng with Intel WiFi-AC 9560. Similar to other reports, neither approach of providing different versions of the requested drivers works.

Bug#969518: (no subject)

Gentle ping

[no subject]

To : Debian Install System Team and Debian ALSA Maintainers also Guillem Jover How do I apt-get install the-program(s) name, all seam to say cannot find the add-ons for Firefox application, for Internal Real Time Clock Module for the Raspberry Pi which includes Models A,B,A+,B+,Pi Zero,Pi 2 and

Bug#969515: (no subject)

ping? Patch is a plain bugfix, so I think uncontroversial?

Bug#862500: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:30:56 +0200 with message-id <2020083056.2cba9efdb99ede0f3d2de...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 6 has caused the Debian Bug report #862500, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This

Bug#890404: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2020 04:58:02 +0200 with message-id <20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600d...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #890404, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This

Bug#875788: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2020 04:58:02 +0200 with message-id <20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600d...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #875788, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This

Bug#967918: (no subject)

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:54:49AM +0100, Aperture wrote: >Patch has also been submitted in salsa as: > >https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/merge_requests/1 ACK, thanks. Merged now, will do an upload shortly. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Bug#967918: (no subject)

Patch has also been submitted in salsa as: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/merge_requests/1

Fresh install of Debian 10.2 subject to bug #860533

Hi, I wasn't sure where to report this, so I'm shooting here. I recently installed Debian 10.2 on a new machine, and went with manual partitioning, putting the swap on an encrypted mdraid with a random key, and the result is that booting the system would have a very large delay on boot. In

Bug#937735: (no subject)

I can confirm, had the same wrong links yesterday in the non-gui installer of the Debian testing netinst iso You can fix this problem by changing the links to: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security

Bug#833863: (no subject)

Behavior is identical in 10.1. What you could do, without rebooting: open another shell (ctrl-alt f2), luksClose the crypted volume, pgremove the physical volume group, then comes the scary part: add some amnesia to partman. I did a # mv /var/lib/partman/devices/=dev\=nvme0n1 /tmp/, went back to

Bug#794410: (no subject)

I encountered this issue trying to install Buster on a Gigabyte Brix 2807 - hanging at 11% trying to install 'discover'. Changing the BIOS setting for OS type from Windows 7 to Windows 8 also fixed it for me. Thanks all, Quentin

Bug#833863: (No Subject)

This behaviour remains in Debian 10.0 in Expert Mode.

Bug#879130: (no subject)

This lack of ports mirrors in choose-mirror is still an issue. Just ran into the problem on the sparc64 port. I submitted a merge request for your patch here: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/choose-mirror/merge_requests/1

Bug#879130: (no subject)

> On May 13, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Gregor Riepl wrote: > > This lack of ports mirrors in choose-mirror is still an issue. > Just ran into the problem on the sparc64 port. > > I submitted a merge request for your patch here: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/choose-mirror/merge_requests/1

Bug#928043: (No Subject)

Evgeny Badin (2019-04-27): > >First guess: Are you trying to use GRUB's cryptodisks support? > > Yes It can't work, sorry; see: https://bugs.debian.org/927165 Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member --

Bug#928043: (No Subject)

I shot a video https://vimeo.com/332814820 Best regards, Evgeny.

Bug#928043: (No Subject)

>First guess: Are you trying to use GRUB's cryptodisks support? Yes >Second guess: Keymap issues? No Best regards, Evgeny.

Bug#926140: Subject: installation-reports: stuck on loading kernel cubieboard2

Subject: installation-reports: stuck on loading kernel cubieboard2 Package: installation-reports Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

This also happens with daily and weekly testing images: At least, tried with netinst from here: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/ And daily from here: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/current/amd64/ PXE installation is also broken with the

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:21:12 +0100 Jan Huijsmans wrote: > Sorry for the spam, PEBKAC, wront netboot.tar.gz. (wget renamed as the > old one from just after 4.19.0-2 kernel update was still there) > > Linking kernel + netboot update would be great though, or is there a > standard delay of a day

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:17:04 +0100 Jan Huijsmans wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:09:31 +0200 Oliver Riesener > wrote: > > On 10/25/18 11:06 AM, Oliver Riesener wrote: > > > On 10/25/18 1:45 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 18:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > > >>

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:09:31 +0200 Oliver Riesener wrote: > On 10/25/18 11:06 AM, Oliver Riesener wrote: > > On 10/25/18 1:45 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 18:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >>> On 10/24/18 6:42 PM, Oliver Riesener wrote: > No unetbootin,

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On 10/25/18 11:06 AM, Oliver Riesener wrote: On 10/25/18 1:45 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 18:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 10/24/18 6:42 PM, Oliver Riesener wrote: No unetbootin, it’s the stock  stretch netboot   installation. initrd kernel from actual

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On 10/25/18 1:45 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 18:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 10/24/18 6:42 PM, Oliver Riesener wrote: No unetbootin, it’s the stock stretch netboot installation. initrd kernel from actual Debian9.5/…./amd64/netboot/netboot.tar.gz didn’t

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 18:44 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/24/18 6:42 PM, Oliver Riesener wrote: > > No unetbootin, it’s the stock stretch netboot installation. > > initrd kernel from actual Debian9.5/…./amd64/netboot/netboot.tar.gz > > didn’t find kernel modules anymore. The

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On 10/24/18 6:42 PM, Oliver Riesener wrote: > No unetbootin, it’s the stock stretch netboot installation. > initrd kernel from actual Debian9.5/…./amd64/netboot/netboot.tar.gz > didn’t find kernel modules anymore. The old one before too. > It’s a point release problem. Older versions of

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

No unetbootin, it’s the stock stretch netboot installation. initrd kernel from actual Debian9.5/…./amd64/netboot/netboot.tar.gz didn’t find kernel modules anymore. The old one before too. It’s a point release problem. Older versions of modules (.udeb ?) seems to be from debian repo. > Am

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

On 10/24/18 5:15 PM, Oliver Riesener wrote: > Debian Stretch 9.5 (stable) kernel 3.16.0-4 > * no packages matching kernel failed. This error usually comes up with installation media created using unetbootin. Have you, by any chance, used unetbootin to create your installation medium? Adrian --

Bug#749991: A tiresome subject for YEARS.

A tiresome subject for YEARS. It has happened again today. Debian Stretch 9.5 (stable) kernel 3.16.0-4 * no packages matching kernel failed.

Bug#846256: (no subject)

I also experience this bug. I got in touch with the debian maintainers for systemd at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904079 According to the maintainer, the issue should be solved by using the `After=` directive in the unit file for console-setup. Regards,   Arnaud

Bug#849400: (no subject)

this affects me, too, and is rather frustrating. i welcome warnings and suggestions from software, but this is just plain annoying without a way to override it. i flashed libreboot into my laptop (it's an opensource bios where grub is the payload in the bios flash chip itself). i want to have a

Bug#890262: (no subject)

* Arthur [2018-02-21 23:03]: > I now have another problem (should I file another bugs?), openning up These are different issues so please don't follow up here. Let's continue this on the thread on debian-arm: https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2018/02/msg00086.html -- Martin

Bug#890404: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: microSD Image versions: debian-9.3.0-i386-netinst, debian-9.3.0-i386-xfce-CD-1, debian-live-9.3.0-i386-xfce, debian-testing-i386-netinst (from 14.02) Date: 14.02.18 Machine: Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 10 Processor: Intel Atom Z2760 Memory: 2048 MB Base

Bug#882393: Subject: installation-reports: Buster installer hangs in vgchange

Subject: installation-reports: Buster installer hangs in vgchange Package: installation-reports Justification: renders package unusable Tags: d-i Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD ISO image Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds

Bug#875788: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Date: Machine: AMD Ryzen 5 1400, 8gb DDR4, 5x 1TB, GeForce GTX 770 2GB, 1250w net aggregat. Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Memory: 8gb DDR Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error

Bug#355801: (no subject)

IMO we can close this bug, because this is nowadays implemented (pretty similar) by qemu-debootstrap. -- regards Thomas

Bug#794410: Subject: debian-installer: Installer hangs during 'select and install software'

Hi, I have the same issue (set-up hangs at language selection on both simple and grafical installer) while installing debian-9.1.0 (i386-DVD-1 or netinstall multiarch) on my samsung ativ smart pc xe500tic. Is there any work-around? Thanks, Laura

Bug#855349: (no subject)

for me an $ apt-get remove kscreensaver kscreensaver-xsavers and $ apt autoremove solved the issue. -- GPG-FPrint: 292B 63BD 0402 DBCC 5026 6F90 AF1A 1478 94F3 7282 old PGP-FPrint: 68B0 853C 8754 F46A 903D 051F EFA1 267B --- I always figured a man was a damn fool if he got up before noon.

Bug#866629: (no subject)

The CD installer ( https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/ ) is not affected with this bug. I had checked it.

Bug#862500: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, Everything worked fine, apart from the AMD HDMI sound, display is fine but sound doesn't work. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: network Image version:

Bug#857756: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: from USB flash drive; written by Rufus Image version:http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/stretch_di_rc2/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-i386-netinst.iso Date: 06.03.2017 Machine: IBM Thinkpad T43 Processor: Intel Pentium M 1.86 Ghz Memory:

Bug#781344: (no subject)

-- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android

Bug#781344: (no subject)

-- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android

Bug#781344: (no subject)

-- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android

Bug#852285: Wrong subject, the missing lib should be in multipath-udeb

Control: reassign -1 disk-detect Control: retitle -1 disk-detect: tries to load obsolete dm-emc module Hi, Allan Jacobsen (2017-01-24): > I looked into this a little more, and the missing lib should be in > multipath-udeb, I have made a bugreport for this. So that was

Processed: Re: Bug#852285: Wrong subject, the missing lib should be in multipath-udeb

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 disk-detect Bug #852285 [installation-reports] installer broken: multipath-udeb depends on non-existent libmpathcmd udeb Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'disk-detect'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #852285 to the

Bug#853855: (no subject)

Le 03/02/2017 à 23:55, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Ian Campbell (2017-02-03): >> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 15:51 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: >>> Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing >>> parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on

Bug#853855: (no subject)

Ian Campbell (2017-02-03): > On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 15:51 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > > Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing > > parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot > > various systemd components, > > d-i doesn't

Bug#853855: (no subject)

On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 15:51 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing > parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot > various systemd components, d-i doesn't use systemd, does it? Ian.

Bug#853855: (no subject)

Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot various systemd components, the list of which can be found in systemd-232/man/kernel-command-line.xml or online in

Bug#852285: Wrong subject, the missing lib should be in multipath-udeb

I looked into this a little more, and the missing lib should be in multipath-udeb, I have made a bugreport for this. The problem with dm-emc is easily fixed, patch is attached. Best regards Allan Jacobsen disk-detect.patch Description: Binary data

Bug#845481: (no subject)

I tried again : There is still a black screen with the same message. error: no suitable video mode found. booting in blind mode But the installer obviously starts because, though I get a black screen, there is a fuzzy blurry corrupted 10-pixel wide line on the top of the screen. This line

Bug#788062: (no subject)

I can confirm this bug for os-prober 1.63ubuntu2. Prober message in host log correlates perfectly with failure in guest log.

Bug#809709: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:18:08 + with message-id <20160103091808.ga12...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#809709: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #809709, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#809709: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: Date: Machine: Processor: Memory: Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ ] Detect network card: [ ]

Bug#794410: (no subject)

I encountered this perfectly reproducible exact 12% total freeze bug using a Jessie installer image dating back a few months on an Intel J1900 host with integrated Realtek network hardware - I'm afraid I don't know which Jessie sub-version. However, on the exact same hardware (including the

Bug#767465: (no subject)

to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/553d8bf2.1000...@gmail.com

Bug#768188: (no subject)

Antonienallee 1, 45279 Essen, Tel.: 0201 8536-600, http://www.linuxhotel.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54c909ab.7070...@villa-vogelsang.de

Bug#705878: (no subject)

Sorry, I meant Iceweasel is also installed as default in cinnamon-desktop, NOT chromium desktop :-P -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54345e6c.2020

Bug#759327: (no subject)

: Extracting .//var/cache/apt/archives/acl_2.2.52-1_i386.deb requires the bzcat command, which is not available After that the installation was not able to proceed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#744210: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:47:12 +0300 with message-id 20140412094712.GG1624@sid.nuvreauspam and subject line Re: Bug#744210: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #744210, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#744210: (no subject)

) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140411130315.7994.50753.reportbug@tapez-votre-commande-shell

Bug#740073: (no subject)

to solve these 2 bugs? At least can someone tell us what is causing them. Thanks Blau Araujo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/531364f3.9060...@gmail.com

Bug#739701: Subject: installation-report: Jessie testing on HP t5540 thinclient

Andreas Glaeser bugs.andreas.glae...@freenet.de (2014-02-21): The current version of Jessie/testing was set up on this box today for testing purposes only. I spent a few days of fiddling around installing the latest stable FreeBSD version 10 first. It was quite painful in fact, but after two

[no subject]

I'm hoping to get armmp udebs added to the kernel before 3.11 is uploaded (patch posted to debian-kernel but it seems to be lost in the tubes somewhere), at which point I'd like to add an armmp netboot image, per the following patch. The patch is obviously pretty trivial but it is blocked on

Bug#684639: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200 with message-id 201308251243.25305.hol...@layer-acht.org and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #684639, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#690166: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:50 +0200 with message-id 201308251426.17126.hol...@layer-acht.org and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #690166, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#690913: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:50 +0200 with message-id 201308251426.17126.hol...@layer-acht.org and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #690913, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

[no subject]

Hi there My name is Alan Hutchinson and I would like to install Debian on a raid 0 system that I have at home , on my home network that I created, I have bean reading up on some of the things that I will need to complete a successful install, for example the raid manager (MDADM) and you also

Bug#718698: (no subject)

if the latest version of os-prober it's able yet to recognize a kernel image on a ReiserFS filesystem you did not have to enter that worrying message in the changelog. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >