Re: Default network configuration system (was Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie)

2023-06-20 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 10:19, Lukas Maerdian wrote: > > Am 19.06.23 um 20:01 schrieb Simon McVittie: > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 14:13:11 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > >> On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 13:35 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >>> Why does isc-dhcp-client have priority:important to begin with? > >>> I

Re: Default network configuration system (was Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie)

2023-06-20 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 13:11:14 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > The 'old world' Please ignore me. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Default network configuration system (was Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie)

2023-06-20 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 11:19:08 CEST Lukas Maerdian wrote: > IMHO ifupdown{2,-ng} is the "old world" The 'old world' and 'not of this time (anymore)' are the absolute worst arguments against something, typically used when no substantive arguments can be made. > potentially in combination

Default network configuration system (was Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie)

2023-06-20 Thread Lukas Maerdian
Am 19.06.23 um 20:01 schrieb Simon McVittie: On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 14:13:11 +0200, Ansgar wrote: On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 13:35 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Why does isc-dhcp-client have priority:important to begin with? I don't think users care so much about a dhcp client but rather a network