Hi all
I'm also available, adding myself below:
El 22 de julio de 2021 21:18:43 CEST, Paul Gevers escribió:
>Hi all,
>
>Thanks to the reply from Ansgar, we now have a release date for
>bullseye: 14 August. For the avoidance of doubt, this is *not* a
>tentative date anymore. I'll do a proper
Hi all,
Thanks to the reply from Ansgar, we now have a release date for
bullseye: 14 August. For the avoidance of doubt, this is *not* a
tentative date anymore. I'll do a proper announcement later today or
tomorrow evening.
14 August (day before DebCamp)
RT: Adam
Image: Steve,
Hi,
On Tue, 2021-07-20 at 22:35 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We currently don't have any day yet with all involved
> teams comfortably present, the one coming closest is 4 September.
> Somebody from ftp available on 14 august?
That should be doable.
Ansgar
Hi all,
Current overview to check if I got things right and to hopefully trigger
more replies. We currently don't have any day yet with all involved
teams comfortably present, the one coming closest is 4 September.
Somebody from ftp available on 14 august?
14 August (day before DebCamp)
On 2021-07-17 22:25:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
> > would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
> > crucial infrastructure (cdbuilder.d.o). Apart
On 16197 March 1977, Paul Gevers wrote:
Albeit there is some progress, we think it better for the people
involved to now say that we will *not* release on July 31.
Unfortunately, that means that we have to start looking for a new date
again. Assuming what we'll learn in the upcoming week or
On Sat, 2021-07-17 at 22:25 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 14 August (day before DebCamp)
> 21 August (last day of DebCamp)
> RT: elbrus
These both look OK.
> 28 August (DebConf)
> RT: elbrus
That's a holiday weekend in the UK; I'll be visiting family and then
the Debian UK BBQ.
> 4
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
> > would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
> > crucial infrastructure
On 18/07/2021 00:24, Donald Norwood wrote:
Hi!
On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
would love to confirm
Hi!
On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
>>> would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
>> would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
>> crucial infrastructure
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
> would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
> crucial infrastructure (cdbuilder.d.o). Apart from this issue (and what
> it means for solving the
Hi all,
On 08-06-2021 21:30, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:50:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> 31 July: ** tentative ** release date
>
> Cool, works for me. Pencilled into my calendar now. :-)
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
would love
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:50:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>So, if I did all the booking right (including updates from IRC) we now have:
>
>26 June
> [Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Adam (release)]
>3 July
> [Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release), Adam (release)]
>10 July
> [Steve + Andy (CD),
Hi all again,
On 07-06-2021 23:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 20:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Nevermind 10 July. Steve, you can stop contemplating about it. We'll
>> go for 24 July as the *tentative* release date.
>
> Unfortunately I've just discovered that I was given the
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 20:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 06-06-2021 20:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > With the availability of Adam now known (and some off-list info),
> > we have:
> >
[...]
> > So, what to pick? We still believe that shorter freezes are better
> > for
> > the Debian
Hi all,
On 06-06-2021 20:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With the availability of Adam now known (and some off-list info), we have:
>
> 26 June
> [Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Adam (release)]
> 3 July
> [Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release), Adam (release)]
> 10 July
> [Steve (CD) MAYBE , Ansgar
Hi all,
On 04-06-2021 06:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June [Ansgar (ftp)]
> 3 July[Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Paul (release)]
> 10 July [Steve (CD) MAYBE , Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release)]
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press, Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release)]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press,
On Sun, 2021-05-30 at 09:09 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June
> 3 July
> 10 July
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 31 July
> 7 August
> 14 August
July 17th doesn't work well for me unfortunately*.
The others currently all look OK, although I'd prefer not to do two
Hi all,
On 30-05-2021 09:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June
> 3 July
> 10 July
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 31 July
> 7 August
> 14 August
This can now be updated to:
26 June [Ansgar (ftp)]
3 July[Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Paul (release)]
10 July
On 2021-05-30 09:09:28 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> [Press]
> > Press can do both the 17th and the 24th. Perhaps we add an additional 3
> > dates?
>
> Yes, let's do that, so the list becomes:
>
> 26 June
> 3 July
> 10 July
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 31 July
> 7
On Sun, 2021-05-30 at 09:09 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June
> 3 July
> 10 July
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 31 July
> 7 August
> 14 August
Currently all of these are fine for me.
Ansgar
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>On 30-05-2021 06:35, Donald Norwood wrote:
>> On 5/29/21 9:12 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:17:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Assuming all goes well
with RC2 and RC3, we'd be looking at the following
Hi,
On 30-05-2021 06:35, Donald Norwood wrote:
> On 5/29/21 9:12 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:17:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Assuming all goes well
>>> with RC2 and RC3, we'd be looking at the following candidate release dates:
>>>
>>> 26 June
>>> 3 July
>>> 10
Hey Paul!
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:17:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>On 24-04-2021 00:41, Donald Norwood wrote:
>> Indeed, from this and the last few posts in the discussion it reads that
>> perhaps June is the better option for the 'timed' ready when ready
>> release date.
>
>The progress
Hi all,
On 24-04-2021 00:41, Donald Norwood wrote:
> Indeed, from this and the last few posts in the discussion it reads that
> perhaps June is the better option for the 'timed' ready when ready
> release date.
The progress of fixing the blocking issues in the debian-installer is
good enough to
On 25/04/21 at 11:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > B) In the installer, detect that firmware-amd-graphics or
> > firmware-misc-nonfree should be installed, and either install it (?),
> > or redirect the user to the unofficial installer that includes them.
>
> That could be achieved for an
[ cc+=-x@ ]
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for your summary, I'm not sure about every single detail, but it
seems to be a good basis for discussion. I might point to it from our
errata page (I didn't have a specific bug report when I wrote the most
recent entries):
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote (Sat, 24 Apr 2021 11:30:03 +0200):
> With Debian 10, the behaviour was that the installation succeeded
> without installing firmware-* packages, and then, and the first boot, X
> would start in a "degraded" mode (using, for example, the vesa driver).
> The user would
On 24/04/21 at 09:25 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote (Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:13:15 +0200):
> > D-I Bullseye RC 1 was published a few hours ago. And at the risk of
> > sounding like a broken record: I have *absolutely no guarantee* to
> > have a fix or workaround for the
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:13:15 +0200):
> D-I Bullseye RC 1 was published a few hours ago. And at the risk of
> sounding like a broken record: I have *absolutely no guarantee* to
> have a fix or workaround for the amdgpu issue in less than a month,
> that would be tested
On 4/23/21 5:00 PM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>
> I'm trusting the release team to block until d-i is ready, from what I
> understand the date that they're trying to find in May is just a
> tentative date. Would it also make sense to keep another tentative date
> for June as a back-up? (I'm
Hi Cyril
On 2021/04/23 22:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> No, I don't have any amdgpu hardware at the moment; but yes, I have
> leader@'s checklist handy for when I can allocate some time to plan for
> this.
I suggest getting a standalone card and laptop (there are some really
cheap ones with amd
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers (2021-04-23):
> I hear you. So, I fear that we're getting into a situation where
> everything except the installer is more or less ready for the bullseye
> release. (Well assuming the shim is signed any time soon).
>
> > D-I Bullseye RC 1 was published a few hours ago. And
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 09:25:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
>
> On 23-04-2021 15:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> Seems like our current best option is May 22 if you can make it.
> >
> > That's definitely not what I would call “best option” from an
> > installer point of view.
>
> I
Hi Cyril,
On 23-04-2021 15:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Seems like our current best option is May 22 if you can make it.
>
> That's definitely not what I would call “best option” from an
> installer point of view.
I hear you. So, I fear that we're getting into a situation where
everything
Hi,
Paul Gevers (2021-04-21):
> > We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the
> > following work for you and do you have any preference?
> > - May 1
> > - May 8
> > - May 15
> > - May 22
> > - May 29
>
> I've seen replies from Steve for CD, from Donald for Press and Cyril
On Wed, 21, Apr, 2021 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers spoke thus..
> I've seen replies from Steve for CD, from Donald for Press and Cyril for
> d-i. Can you please let us know if/when you're available?
> May 1 CD, Press
> May 8 CD, Press
> May 15 CD
> May 22 CD, Press
> May 29 (CD)
>
> [d-i:
[I'm quite behind on list mail in general, and tend to use the BTS for
tracking / processing SRM work. Direct mail often works better than
waiting for me to notice list mail]
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 21:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I've seen replies from Steve for CD, from Donald for Press and
にゃあ！
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 21:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can you please let us know if/when you're available?
> May 1 CD, Press
> May 8 CD, Press
> May 15 CD
> May 22 CD, Press
> May 29 (CD)
All should be fine for me. It's not like one can do much other
interesting things currently.
Hi ftpmasters, Adam,
On 09-04-2021 20:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
[...]
> We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the
> following work for you and do you have any preference?
> - May 1
> - May 8
> - May 15
> - May
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:07:43 +0200):
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:38:34 +0200):
> > > Ideally of course, you'd be able to test in unstable that
> > > the solution actually works before we accept them in testing. Is that
> > > feasible?
> >
> >
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:38:34 +0200):
> > Ideally of course, you'd be able to test in unstable that
> > the solution actually works before we accept them in testing. Is that
> > feasible?
>
> Hmm, the installer installs tasksel from testing by default AFAIK, so that
>
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:55:34 +0200):
> Hi Holger,
>
> On 10-04-2021 18:14, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>> 2. A problem came up during freeze regarding input methods for several
> >>>languages:
> >>>Starting with bullseye, GNOME depends on ibus, which is not fully
> >>>
Hi Holger,
On 10-04-2021 18:14, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>> 2. A problem came up during freeze regarding input methods for several
>>>languages:
>>>Starting with bullseye, GNOME depends on ibus, which is not fully
>>>compatible with the view of some language teams, who would like to
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:14:36 +0200):
> That's not just my opinion, but sort of consensus of the involved people.
> Going through the above mentioned thread shows that.
> There are also alternatives mentioned, but they all have their disadvantages,
> that's why the
Am 10. April 2021 20:32:50 MESZ schrieb Ivo De Decker :
>I went trough the list and unblocked all the translation updates. Let us
>know if I missed anything.
Looks good, many thanks.
Holger
Hi,
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Hi Holger,
On 4/10/21 5:58 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
1. https://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html
It's of course additional work to file the unblock bugreports, but I would
do that, if there are no objections.
I went trough the list and unblocked all the translation updates. Let us
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote (Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:45:52 +0200):
> Hi Holger,
>
> On 10-04-2021 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Maybe the release-team could look into the pending unblock issues for d-i
> > in the meantime?
>
> Were unblock requests filed? If so, can you point me at them as I don't
>
Hi,
sob., 10 kwi 2021 o 13:18 Holger Wansing napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sat, 10 Apr 2021 11:54:59 +0200):
> > Hi,
> >
> > Paul Gevers (2021-04-09):
> > > The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
> > > Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:07:54 +0200):
> Paul Gevers (2021-04-10):
> > On 10-04-2021 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > Maybe the release-team could look into the pending unblock issues
> > > for d-i in the meantime?
> >
> > Were unblock requests filed? If so, can you
Paul Gevers (2021-04-10):
> On 10-04-2021 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Maybe the release-team could look into the pending unblock issues
> > for d-i in the meantime?
>
> Were unblock requests filed? If so, can you point me at them as I
> don't know which unblock requests you're talking
Hi Holger,
On 10-04-2021 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Maybe the release-team could look into the pending unblock issues for d-i
> in the meantime?
Were unblock requests filed? If so, can you point me at them as I don't
know which unblock requests you're talking about? If not, they don't
appear
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sat, 10 Apr 2021 11:54:59 +0200):
> Hi,
>
> Paul Gevers (2021-04-09):
> > The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
> > Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some
> > love, but the state is much better than we
Hi,
Paul Gevers (2021-04-09):
> The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
> Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some
> love, but the state is much better than we remembered from the same
> time in buster.
As already explained, trying to
Hello, everyone
On 4/9/21 2:47 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
>
> The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
> Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some
> love, but the state is much
Hey Paul and others!
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:47:21PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
>
>The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
>Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some
>love,
Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good.
Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some
love, but the state is much better than we remembered from the same time
in buster.
Last time
58 matches
Mail list logo
