Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:43:33 +0200
with message-id <20161017164333.lbpnbt3hys4xw...@home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#841072: installation-report: failure to mount the EFI
partition: IO charset ascii not found
has caused the Debian Bug report #841072,
regarding instal
Raphael Hertzog (2016-10-17):
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: 2.62
> Severity: important
>
> -- Package-specific info:
>
> Boot method: USB key
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
>
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.62
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB key
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
build of 2016-10-03
Date: 2016-10-17
Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad X260
Base
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:56:37 +
with message-id 1295718997.2505.215.camel@eeepc.Belkin
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #509186,
regarding [Installation-Report] Failure in KVM 2Gb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:55 +
with message-id e1otbnh-0004zh...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #301381
has caused the Debian Bug report #301381,
regarding Debian Installation Report: failure of debian-installer RC3 on a Dell
Latitude D610
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id e1otbo1-00067q...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #260257
has caused the Debian Bug report #260257,
regarding Installation report (failure on scanning disks)
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst in kvm
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20081218-1/amd64/
(Downloaded with jigdo: md5sum OK)
Date: 19 december 2008
Machine: KVM emulator on a Dell Latitude D630 amd64
Processor: QEMU Virtual CPU version
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/pxeboot.tar.gz (dated
2004-07-18 12:36), downloading testing packages
uname -a: Linux hostname 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2004-07-19 16:00
Method:
(EET)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation report: Failure 3
From: Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16 Feb 2004 00:18:50 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 69
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us
))
id 1BWtPr-zK-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 16:54:07 +0800
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:54:07 +0800
From: Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
| It's in pci.ids, but it is not in the discover1-data database, or in
| usb-discover.
Ahh.
| You said that you loaded both ehci-hcd and usb-ohci by hand, and
| it seems to me you should only need one; so which is it, ohci or
|
Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
| It's in pci.ids, but it is not in the discover1-data database, or in
| usb-discover.
Ahh.
| You said that you loaded both ehci-hcd and usb-ohci by hand, and
| it seems to me you should only need
Cameron Patrick wrote:
Output of lspci:
:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
:00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
Maybe
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:57:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
| Cameron Patrick wrote:
| Output of lspci:
|
| :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
| :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
| :00:02.2 USB
Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:57:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
| Cameron Patrick wrote:
| Output of lspci:
|
| :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
| :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:09:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Cameron Patrick wrote:
Maybe - though they're listed in /usr/share/misc/pci.ids. lspci -n says:
:00:02.0 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
:00:02.1 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
:00:02.2 Class 0c03: 10de:0068 (rev
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:09:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Cameron Patrick wrote:
Maybe - though they're listed in /usr/share/misc/pci.ids. lspci -n says:
:00:02.0 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
:00:02.1 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4)
:00:02.2
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Test Candidate 1, downloaded from
http://ftp.it.net.au/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-i386/tc1/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
Date: 6 June 2004
Method: Booted off a USB flash drive with a 110mb ISO on it
Machine:
* Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-16 00:18]:
Detect hardware seemed go well, but I could not found /dev/hda or
/dev/ide/*
This is third installation test with same computer. First succeeded
Can you please test a current image from
* Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-09 02:01]:
After failing to install Sarge at home I took my movable hard-disk to
the place with Debian mirror in the local net. Booting from floppies
went smoothly. Installation also, until installation of lilo failed.
Error message was almost
Hello,
After solving problems with
awk and sleep in netinst cd,
I still have a problem with lilo dependencies-
it reports -
Package libdevmapper 1.00 is not installed
It's a bug or a feature :).
ktt
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail
This is third installation test with same computer. First succeeded
(reported 18 Dec 2003 14:49:35 +0200). Second time lilo installation
failed (reported 09 Feb 2004 02:01:04 +0200). Now I could not access
hard disc at all. Not a promising trend:(
Both problems are (afaik) related to
Eric Bus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is third installation test with same computer. First succeeded
(reported 18 Dec 2003 14:49:35 +0200). Second time lilo installation
failed (reported 09 Feb 2004 02:01:04 +0200). Now I could not access
hard disc at all. Not a promising trend:(
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040215
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-02-15/floppy/
Date: 15 Feb 2004
Method: Boot from floppies, packages from local network
Machine: Home assembled PC
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040102
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040102
Date: 07 Feb 2004
Method: Boot from floppies
Boot floppies worked well. I could not continue installation,
because I have only ppp (modem) connection to the
]; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:01:03 +0200 (EET)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation report: Failure
From: Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Feb 2004 13:01:03 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 55
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040102
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040102
Date: 08 Feb 2004
Method: Boot from floppies, packages from local network
Machine: Home assembled PC
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ 1800 MHz
Memory: 256
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had earlier used the older woody installer to load up debian on this
machine and then thought that I'd try out the new installer just to see
how it goes. Everything went fine until I got to base software install
and then there was a failure installing awk
Hi all,
New year, new images, new luck, new exciting features:
used image from ~manty:
sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00)
2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab
Everything works fine until Installation of Basesystem
installation returned Error 127
tail
used image from ~manty:
sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00)
2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab
Everything works fine until Installation of Basesystem
installation returned Error 127
tail /target/var/log/debootstrap.log
Errors were encountered while processing:
libgnutls7
Erich Waelde wrote:
New year, new images, new luck, new exciting features:
used image from ~manty:
sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00)
2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab
Everything works fine until Installation of Basesystem
installation returned Error 127
tail
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:50:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Erich Waelde wrote:
New year, new images, new luck, new exciting features:
used image from ~manty:
sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00)
2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab
Everything works fine until
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20031230
uname -a:
Date: 1 Jan 2004
Method: netinstall ISO image, no proxy, did not change any settings.
Machine: No name
Processor: Pentium 133 MMX
Memory: 64 Mb
Root Device: IDE Quantam 2.1 Gb (secondary master).
Root Size/partition table: 1.9 Gb hda1
33 matches
Mail list logo