Bug#841072: marked as done (installation-report: failure to mount the EFI partition: IO charset ascii not found)

2016-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:43:33 +0200 with message-id <20161017164333.lbpnbt3hys4xw...@home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#841072: installation-report: failure to mount the EFI partition: IO charset ascii not found has caused the Debian Bug report #841072, regarding instal

Bug#841072: installation-report: failure to mount the EFI partition: IO charset ascii not found

2016-10-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Raphael Hertzog (2016-10-17): > Package: installation-reports > Version: 2.62 > Severity: important > > -- Package-specific info: > > Boot method: USB key > Image version: > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso >

Bug#841072: installation-report: failure to mount the EFI partition: IO charset ascii not found

2016-10-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Package: installation-reports Version: 2.62 Severity: important -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB key Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso build of 2016-10-03 Date: 2016-10-17 Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad X260 Base

Bug#509186: marked as done ([Installation-Report] Failure in KVM 2Gb)

2011-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:56:37 + with message-id 1295718997.2505.215.camel@eeepc.Belkin and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #509186, regarding [Installation-Report] Failure in KVM 2Gb to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#301381: marked as done (Debian Installation Report: failure of debian-installer RC3 on a Dell Latitude D610 (SATA related))

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:55 + with message-id e1otbnh-0004zh...@ravel.debian.org and subject line Closing old installation report #301381 has caused the Debian Bug report #301381, regarding Debian Installation Report: failure of debian-installer RC3 on a Dell Latitude D610

Bug#260257: marked as done (Installation report (failure on scanning disks))

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 + with message-id e1otbo1-00067q...@ravel.debian.org and subject line Closing old installation report #260257 has caused the Debian Bug report #260257, regarding Installation report (failure on scanning disks) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#509186: [Installation-Report] Failure in KVM 2Gb

2008-12-19 Thread Didier Raboud
Package: installation-reports Boot method: netinst in kvm Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20081218-1/amd64/ (Downloaded with jigdo: md5sum OK) Date: 19 december 2008 Machine: KVM emulator on a Dell Latitude D630 amd64 Processor: QEMU Virtual CPU version

Bug#260257: Installation report (failure on scanning disks)

2004-07-19 Thread Jason Williams
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/pxeboot.tar.gz (dated 2004-07-18 12:36), downloading testing packages uname -a: Linux hostname 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 unknown Date: 2004-07-19 16:00 Method:

Bug#232937: marked as done (installation report: Failure 3)

2004-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
(EET) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation report: Failure 3 From: Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 16 Feb 2004 00:18:50 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 69 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us

Bug#252962: marked as done (Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive)

2004-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
)) id 1BWtPr-zK-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 16:54:07 +0800 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:54:07 +0800 From: Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-08 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: | It's in pci.ids, but it is not in the discover1-data database, or in | usb-discover. Ahh. | You said that you loaded both ehci-hcd and usb-ohci by hand, and | it seems to me you should only need one; so which is it, ohci or |

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-08 Thread Joey Hess
Cameron Patrick wrote: On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: | It's in pci.ids, but it is not in the discover1-data database, or in | usb-discover. Ahh. | You said that you loaded both ehci-hcd and usb-ohci by hand, and | it seems to me you should only need

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-07 Thread Joey Hess
Cameron Patrick wrote: Output of lspci: :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) :00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) Maybe

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-07 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:57:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: | Cameron Patrick wrote: | Output of lspci: | | :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) | :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) | :00:02.2 USB

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-07 Thread Joey Hess
Cameron Patrick wrote: On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:57:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: | Cameron Patrick wrote: | Output of lspci: | | :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) | :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:09:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Cameron Patrick wrote: Maybe - though they're listed in /usr/share/misc/pci.ids. lspci -n says: :00:02.0 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4) :00:02.1 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4) :00:02.2 Class 0c03: 10de:0068 (rev

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-07 Thread Joey Hess
Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:09:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Cameron Patrick wrote: Maybe - though they're listed in /usr/share/misc/pci.ids. lspci -n says: :00:02.0 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4) :00:02.1 Class 0c03: 10de:0067 (rev a4) :00:02.2

Bug#252962: Installation report -- failure with USB flash drive

2004-06-06 Thread Cameron Patrick
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Test Candidate 1, downloaded from http://ftp.it.net.au/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-i386/tc1/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz Date: 6 June 2004 Method: Booted off a USB flash drive with a 110mb ISO on it Machine:

Bug#232937: installation report: Failure 3

2004-05-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-16 00:18]: Detect hardware seemed go well, but I could not found /dev/hda or /dev/ide/* This is third installation test with same computer. First succeeded Can you please test a current image from

Bug#231807: installation report: Failure 2

2004-05-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-09 02:01]: After failing to install Sarge at home I took my movable hard-disk to the place with Debian mirror in the local net. Booting from floppies went smoothly. Installation also, until installation of lilo failed. Error message was almost

Re: Re: Installation Report (failure)

2004-02-21 Thread ktt
Hello, After solving problems with awk and sleep in netinst cd, I still have a problem with lilo dependencies- it reports - Package libdevmapper 1.00 is not installed It's a bug or a feature :). ktt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail

Bug#232937: installation report: Failure 3

2004-02-16 Thread Eric Bus
This is third installation test with same computer. First succeeded (reported 18 Dec 2003 14:49:35 +0200). Second time lilo installation failed (reported 09 Feb 2004 02:01:04 +0200). Now I could not access hard disc at all. Not a promising trend:( Both problems are (afaik) related to

Bug#232937: installation report: Failure 3

2004-02-16 Thread Jukka Neppius
Eric Bus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is third installation test with same computer. First succeeded (reported 18 Dec 2003 14:49:35 +0200). Second time lilo installation failed (reported 09 Feb 2004 02:01:04 +0200). Now I could not access hard disc at all. Not a promising trend:(

Bug#232937: installation report: Failure 3

2004-02-15 Thread Jukka Neppius
Package: installation-reports Version: 20040215 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-02-15/floppy/ Date: 15 Feb 2004 Method: Boot from floppies, packages from local network Machine: Home assembled PC Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+

Bug#231682: installation report: Failure

2004-02-08 Thread Jukka Neppius
Package: installation-reports Version: 20040102 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040102 Date: 07 Feb 2004 Method: Boot from floppies Boot floppies worked well. I could not continue installation, because I have only ppp (modem) connection to the

Bug#231682: marked as done (installation report: Failure)

2004-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
]; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:01:03 +0200 (EET) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation report: Failure From: Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 08 Feb 2004 13:01:03 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 55 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content

Bug#231807: installation report: Failure 2

2004-02-08 Thread Jukka Neppius
Package: installation-reports Version: 20040102 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040102 Date: 08 Feb 2004 Method: Boot from floppies, packages from local network Machine: Home assembled PC Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ 1800 MHz Memory: 256

Re: Installation report failure 20031230

2004-01-02 Thread Erich Waelde
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Had earlier used the older woody installer to load up debian on this machine and then thought that I'd try out the new installer just to see how it goes. Everything went fine until I got to base software install and then there was a failure installing awk

Installation Report (failure)

2004-01-01 Thread Erich Waelde
Hi all, New year, new images, new luck, new exciting features: used image from ~manty: sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00) 2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab Everything works fine until Installation of Basesystem installation returned Error 127 tail

Re: Installation Report (failure)

2004-01-01 Thread Jason Rupard
used image from ~manty: sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00) 2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab Everything works fine until Installation of Basesystem installation returned Error 127 tail /target/var/log/debootstrap.log Errors were encountered while processing: libgnutls7

Re: Installation Report (failure)

2004-01-01 Thread Joey Hess
Erich Waelde wrote: New year, new images, new luck, new exciting features: used image from ~manty: sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00) 2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab Everything works fine until Installation of Basesystem installation returned Error 127 tail

Re: Installation Report (failure)

2004-01-01 Thread Richard Hirst
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:50:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Erich Waelde wrote: New year, new images, new luck, new exciting features: used image from ~manty: sarge-i386-netinst-20031231.iso (2003-12-31 17:00) 2c806ec1e53ac891b431ab0a6a84bfab Everything works fine until

Installation report failure 20031230

2004-01-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20031230 uname -a: Date: 1 Jan 2004 Method: netinstall ISO image, no proxy, did not change any settings. Machine: No name Processor: Pentium 133 MMX Memory: 64 Mb Root Device: IDE Quantam 2.1 Gb (secondary master). Root Size/partition table: 1.9 Gb hda1