Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Fri 2022-03-18 09:13:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Unfortunately it looks like the upload failed: > > gnupg2_2.2.27-2+deb11u1.dsc: Refers to non-existing file > 'gnupg2_2.2.27.orig.tar.bz2.asc' Sigh. thanks for the note. I've just tried again, this time including the orig.tar.bz2.asc in

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

Adam D. Barratt (2022-02-19): > That looks fine to me, but will need a d-i ack as the package builds a > udeb; tagging and CCing accordingly. No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member --

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 19:29 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2022-03-17 17:49:04 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > > On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > > >

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Thu 2022-03-17 17:49:04 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i >> > > [...] >> > That looks fine to me, but will need a d-i ack as the

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > [...] > > That looks fine to me, but will need a d-i ack as the package > > builds a > > udeb; tagging and CCing accordingly. > >

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version >> 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1. >> > > The version mentioned above

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

but yes its a 5 tree debian, oldstable stable testing unstable experimental On Sat, Feb 19, 2022, 18:10 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version > 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1. > The version mentioned above is correct, but the proposed changelog is not: +gnupg2