Hi there!
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:39:59 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le jeudi, 30 janvier 2014, 02.51:48 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> II. How to install a backported kernel
>> ==
>> (…)
>> Now here's another way which doesn't look so scary:
>>
>> 1) Ma
Hi Cyril,
Le jeudi, 30 janvier 2014, 02.51:48 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> as mentioned earlier this month, I had a little proof of concept for
> Paris Mini-DebConf 2014[1]. I've polished a few things, so here we go.
>
> 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2014/01/msg00239.html
Thanks for th
Hi Frans and EddyP,
Its fantastic! I wiped out everything and started from scratch and I
can now build the miniiso. I'll start posting what I learn about
customizing d-i in my blog.
Thank you.
--
Rage Callao
Free Software :: empower :: educate
Blog: http://ragecallao.wordpress.com
--
To UNSUBS
On Thursday 25 January 2007 02:40, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Rage Callao wrote:
> > I did use fakeroot as well as tried it as root but still the same
> > error.
If you ran it as root at some point, try cleaning up by running 'make
reallyclean' _as root_ and then trying again with fakeroot.
pgpXVGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rage Callao wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Probably not using fakeroot or being root while trying to build the
>> image?
>
> Hi EddyP, thank you for replying.
>
> I did use fakeroot as well as tried it as root but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rage Callao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm been trying to build the d-i miniiso by following the instructions
> here:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/GUIBuild
>
> But unfortunately I keep running into the same error:
>
> Unpacking libslang2 (from ude
Steve Langasek wrote:
> This works well for aboot-installer, which is alpha-specific and is
> probably ready to move into testing at this time
If it's ready you should make an upload to testing-proposed-updates. Or
if the version currently in unstable is the right one we can copy it
from there.
>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 06:40:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The images at http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/alpha/
> > are built daily at should be quite usable. (The ones not in the sid
> > directory are built daily but are NOT usable, because ther
Steve Langasek wrote:
> The images at http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/alpha/
> are built daily at should be quite usable. (The ones not in the sid
> directory are built daily but are NOT usable, because there's a nice
> catch-22 with "only packages for beta2 will be pushed
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:37:03PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to help test d-i on Alpha, but it appears that I must first
> build the latest version since the builds are out of date. Are there
> instructions anywhere on doing this?
The boost is getting d-i from Alioth CVS.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:37:03PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> I would like to help test d-i on Alpha, but it appears that I must first
> build the latest version since the builds are out of date. Are there
> instructions anywhere on doing this?
Which builds are you looking at?
The images at ht
Blars Blarson schrieb am Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2003 um 15:04:46 -0800:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for
> > all relevant image types.
>
> cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future poi
Blars Blarson wrote:
> The sparc netcfg udebs need to get into the debian archives. (The
> sparc autobuilder is either not running or still trying to catch up.
> I'd rate python a higher priority.) Should I sign and upload the
> package I built?
Yes, certianly.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
De
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> >d. Work with me to get sparc turned on in its architecture list,
>> > so sparc images can enter the archive.
>>=20
>> I think silo-installer is needed before we start bothering with any
>> automatic building.
>
>Well yeah, it's kind of
Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for
> > all relevant image types.
>
> cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point
> floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's no
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for
> all relevant image types.
cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point
floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's not something I'm
concerned about.
Blars Blarson wrote:
> After not doing anything on it for six weeks, I'm again trying to get
> debian-installer working on sparc.
>
> First iritation was needing to rebuild python2.3, as it's a dependancy
> of a build-dendancy. (Apparently the sparc autobuilder is still
> down.) That took 14 hou
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > I copied by deb line, changed stable to unstable and ran this command:
> > for p in install libdiscover1-pic libdiscover1 genext2fs mklibs libdebconfclient0
> > libdebian-installer3; do apt-get -qqyu install $p; done
>
> You can list as many packages
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:07:30PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 07:54:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Recipe:
> > > > > - install the build-dependancies
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> look like my greatest success:
> Current default timezone: 'Australia/Perth'.
> Local time is now: Thu Jul 3 12:46:42 WST 2003.
> Universal Time is now: Thu Jul 3 04:46:42 UTC 2003.
> Run 'tzconfig' if you wish to change it.
>
> Setting up lib
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 07:54:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> >
> > > > Recipe:
> > > > - install the build-dependancies on the host system
> > > > I don't know what they are, don't know how to find ou
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 07:54:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
>
> > > Recipe:
> > > - install the build-dependancies on the host system
> > > I don't know what they are, don't know how to find out so we'll see what
> > > breaks
> >
> > The buil
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > Recipe:
> > - install the build-dependancies on the host system
> > I don't know what they are, don't know how to find out so we'll see what
> > breaks
>
> The build dependencies are listed in build/debian/control.in. One easy way
> to have it che
On 3 Jul 2003, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 23.41 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > On 2 Jul 2003, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> >
> > > Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 02.03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > I'll send this off while I ponder the next breakage:
> > Need to download : rootskel c
Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 23.41 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 2 Jul 2003, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> > Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 02.03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I'll send this off while I ponder the next breakage:
> Need to download : rootskel cdebconf-udeb main-menu udpkg anna
> di-utils-shell ker
On 2 Jul 2003, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 02.03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> >
> > Recipe:
> > - install the build-dependancies on the host system
> > I don't know what they are, don't know how to find out so we'll see what
> > breaks
> see build/debian/control
> > -
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:03:57AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2003, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> > Am Die, 2003-07-01 um 14.40 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > I would need to build _everything_, unless there are binaries some place
> > > for oldworld powermacs. The build docum
Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 02.03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Recipe:
> - install the build-dependancies on the host system
> I don't know what they are, don't know how to find out so we'll see what
> breaks
see build/debian/control
> - run "{sudo,fakeroot} make build"
> Kultarr:~/cvs/bf/debia
On 1 Jul 2003, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Die, 2003-07-01 um 14.40 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > I would need to build _everything_, unless there are binaries some place
> > for oldworld powermacs. The build document is a little terse, and I
> > don't see a list of udebs at all.
> No you don
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 08:12, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>And I am fairly sure the buildd is compiling as a normal user and not
>>root. This will at the moment make it impossible to build the boot
>>floppies. I suspect this package will fail to build on all platforms
On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 08:12, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Alastair McKinstry]
> >> It's not clear to me if you intend for the package to include the whole
> >> debian-installer source tree, or just the build directory.
> > Just the build directory.
>
> I believe I've seen some buildd maintainers
[Alastair McKinstry]
>> It's not clear to me if you intend for the package to include the whole
>> debian-installer source tree, or just the build directory.
> Just the build directory.
I believe I've seen some buildd maintainers complain about packages
requiring network access when building from
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 00:35, Joey Hess wrote:
> Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > In order to get d-i built on various archs, etc. I propose to create a
> > package debian-installer.
> >
> > The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
> > debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.d
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> In order to get d-i built on various archs, etc. I propose to create a
> package debian-installer.
>
> The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
> debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.deb, that puts the images and
> associated documentation in
Ok, I resent the message with signed a different mailer, to verify.
But I will be sending messages unsigned for the next while, until the
bug gets fixed in evolution / gpg.
Mail me if you need a message to be signed / encrypted.
- Alastair
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 20:37, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> H
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
> > Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC 1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4
>
> Anybody else running gpg 1
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
> debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.deb, that puts the images and
> associated documentation into a place suitable for an archive,
> eg. /var/www/debian/dists/$(DIST)/main/disks-$(ARCH)/$(VERSION)/.
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC 1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4
Anybody else running gpg 1.0.6 or 1.2.x got 'BAD Signature' on this
message?
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Mario Lang wrote:
> > What I want to do is to build all these packages, and then go on to
> > create bootable disks from the results.
>
> You do not need to do this. The whole idea of udeb packages
> is that they can reside in the archives, and you do not need to build
> the
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Stephane Enten wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I have not yet found any way to make any packages from this source, and
> > > that is why I think somethin
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
>
> You could change the apt-get command ran by the Makefile to get rid of
> the Dependancies check, but it would not be really clean.
I'm not yet that desperate;-)
> > While I could install the package from Sarge, it is actually the CVS
> > version
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Stephane Enten wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have not yet found any way to make any packages from this source, and
> > that is why I think something is missing.
>
> You can to to the "libdebian-insta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:50:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've been able to build the floppy 'net' image without any trouble only
>> by installing the needed packages on the host system (and removing the
>> bog
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
>
> > I've been able to build the floppy 'net' image without any trouble only
> > by installing the needed packages on the host system (and removing the
> > bogl stuff from the flop
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:50:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >
> > > obviously not, since you should ordinarily not build
> > > libdebian-installer yourself, you should just install it into your
>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:50:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> > obviously not, since you should ordinarily not build
> > libdebian-installer yourself, you should just install it into your
> > host system. libdebian-installer is a normal debia
On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> obviously not, since you should ordinarily not build
> libdebian-installer yourself, you should just install it into your
> host system. libdebian-installer is a normal debian package, which is
> built like all normal debian packages.
>
> Please, please r
*
| The 'make install' for libdebian-installer has put the libraries in
| place, but of course the next phase is trying to install stuff that
| wants the libdebian-installer package in place.
libdebian-installer is a debian package, which you build by using
dpkg-buildpackage and then install usi
On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> *
>
> | I want to build the version of d-i I just checked out of CVS and test
> | it. I don't see that what you suggest advances that.
>
> build libdebian-installer, install libdebian-installer, build the rest
> of d-i.
My sequence of commands is now t
*
| I want to build the version of d-i I just checked out of CVS and test
| it. I don't see that what you suggest advances that.
build libdebian-installer, install libdebian-installer, build the rest
of d-i.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX i
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to build the version of d-i I just checked out of CVS and
> test it. I don't see that what you suggest advances that.
At buildtime d-i pulls in librarycode from the buildsystem. It uses
the evil mklibs tool, which only copies the symbols really needed by
the in
On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> *
>
> | I am confused. install libdebian-installer3?
>
> yes, install it.
>
> | I thought I was trying to build it. Are you saying we have recursive
> | dependencies?
>
> No. I'm saying to build a boot-floppy you need libdebian-installer3
> somewhere.
*
| I am confused. install libdebian-installer3?
yes, install it.
| I thought I was trying to build it. Are you saying we have recursive
| dependencies?
No. I'm saying to build a boot-floppy you need libdebian-installer3
somewhere. Unlike boot-floppies, d-i usually shouldn't be built full
fr
On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> *
>
> | > For starters, it's woody. If there's no list, would someone mail a woody
> | > package list to $(echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sed -e s=debian=summer=)
> | > for a system that does build d-i and I will tell you what I needed to
> | > add to my syste
*
| > For starters, it's woody. If there's no list, would someone mail a woody
| > package list to $(echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sed -e s=debian=summer=)
| > for a system that does build d-i and I will tell you what I needed to
| > add to my system.
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dep
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> > *
> >
> > | I don't see any build instructions there though.
> >
> > build/README perhaps?
>
> In the interests of encouraging people to improve the documentation
> Recipe:
> - install the build
56 matches
Mail list logo
