Hi Ben,
On 12.12.2013 01:50, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: reassign -1 installation-reports
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 21:56 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
It looks like a bug in the linux kernel.
I don't think so. The kernel log indicates that it got a negative
response from the user agent.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:51:48AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 12.12.2013 01:50, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: reassign -1 installation-reports
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 21:56 +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
It looks like a bug in the linux kernel.
I don't think so. The
Processing control commands:
reassign 725714 linux
Bug #725714 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Recent netinst.iso
doesn't write missing firmware to /run/udev/firmware-missing
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
Control: reassign 725714 linux
Control: tags 725714 d-i
Hi Manfred,
On 11.12.2013 05:55, Manfred Rebentisch wrote:
Burned the Jessie-Image on a CD and start the PC with the Logitech
Illuminated Keyboard.
I tried to use graphical and textual install. In both cases all have
worked. This
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 installation-reports
Bug #725714 [linux] installation-reports: Recent netinst.iso doesn't write
missing firmware to /run/udev/firmware-missing
Bug reassigned from package 'linux' to 'installation-reports'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug
I am testing upgrades from lenny to squeeze in a VM. To get as close as
possible to my existing system I used the lenny installer, but the new
installer reportedly supports lenny too. If I use it, will I get the
same setup in the end? In particular, I need software RAID with the
same metadata
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:07:55PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I am testing upgrades from lenny to squeeze in a VM. To get as close as
possible to my existing system I used the lenny installer, but the new
installer reportedly supports lenny too. If I use it, will I get the
same setup
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:38 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:07:55PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I am testing upgrades from lenny to squeeze in a VM. To get as close as
possible to my existing system I used the lenny installer, but the new
installer reportedly
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:47 +
with message-id e1otbn9-0004j9...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #282671
has caused the Debian Bug report #282671,
regarding new installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Below a reply to a very old post from Joey [1] to which I should have
replied then, but never got around to. I've quoted his mail in full for
context.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/05/msg00345.html
On Thursday 08 May 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
A long, long time ago I proposed
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Over the past months I've been working on a new component that allows
to change settings for the installer. Main intention is to improve
the flexibility of the installer and the user experience.
Not that much feedback, but I guess that was to be
On Thursday 15 January 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Being able to easily (and really), switch from expert mode to standard
mode is really great for those who just needs expert mode in the firsts
steps.
Hmmm again. That is not really what happens, especially not if you compare
it to the current
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 23:06 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
If I understand correctly, the idea is to be able to be able to switch
*easily* between standard and expert mode during the installation.
This is a nice.
Hmm. Have you tried booting in
Hi all,
Over the past months I've been working on a new component that allows to
change settings for the installer. Main intention is to improve the
flexibility of the installer and the user experience.
I'm now at the point where I'm happy with the framework and would like to
get some
Hello Frans,
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:06 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Over the past months I've been working on a new component that allows to
change settings for the installer. [..]
What I will say is:
* it completely changes the concept of expert mode
If I understand correctly, the idea is
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
If I understand correctly, the idea is to be able to be able to switch
*easily* between standard and expert mode during the installation.
This is a nice.
Hmm. Have you tried booting in expert mode?
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Test images for amd64 and i386 (newt frontend only) are available from:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/settings/
Major OOPS!
I just realize that the image for i386 is completely broken as some of the
modified udebs are not included. I'll fix
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Test images for amd64 and i386 (newt frontend only) are available
from: http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/settings/
I just realize that the image for i386 is completely broken as some of
the
using the bootloader already
installed in the MBR using the 'rootnoverify and chainloader' commands.
I have Debian installed on both partition 7 and 15 using the new installer.
I chose the 'unstable' packages option.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 282671 installation-reports
Bug#282671: new installer
Warning: Unknown package 'send'
Warning: Unknown package 'to'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports
send to' to `installation-reports
PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:05:30 -0400
Subject: New Installer is FANTASTIC!
From: internettyj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:18:49 -0400
Content-Transfer
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the imageThe image was
downloaded from ftp:debian.org
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell promptLinux braincramp
2.4.26-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 22 13:00:49 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Date
* Thomas Borger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-04 11:31]:
Config network: worked after I changed manually some configuration files of
wireless (/etc/pcmcia . . .)
What changed did you have to make in order to get it to work? Can you
please try a new image from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed there are three new installer options. I'd like to add them in the
manual.
1) debian-installer/probe/usb=false
Is this i386 only?
Is this for systems that freeze when USB is probed?
Does this option replace the 'nousb' option currently
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 18:36 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
2) hw-detect/start_pcmcia=false
Is this i386 only?
No.
When should this option be used?
When you don't want d-i to try to start PCMCIA, because it crashes
your computer. This mostly happens when the resource ranges are
wrong. It will
Frans Pop wrote:
1) debian-installer/probe/usb=false
Is this i386 only?
Is this for systems that freeze when USB is probed?
Does this option replace the 'nousb' option currently described in:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05s01.html#id2453879
or are they for different
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 13:11 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Oddly, some report that it says it's skipping the ide-floppy driver and
then freezes. That is right before it starts pcmcia, and maybe it does
not update the progress bar quite right.
But it is updated, I see Starting PC card services when
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 21:12 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 24 April 2004 19:07, you wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 18:36 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
2) hw-detect/start_pcmcia=false
Is this i386 only?
No.
Do you know which others?
Uhm, as I said in another mail, I misunderstood
Per Olofsson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 13:11 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Oddly, some report that it says it's skipping the ide-floppy driver and
then freezes. That is right before it starts pcmcia, and maybe it does
not update the progress bar quite right.
But it is updated, I see
How does this look for the PCMCIA option?
(I have removed most of the SGML tags.)
Some laptop models produced by DELL are known to crash when PCMCIA device
detection tries to access some hardware addresses. If you experience such
a problem and you don't need PCMCIA support during the
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 22:20 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
How does this look for the PCMCIA option?
Good!
Some laptop models produced by DELL are known to crash when PCMCIA device
detection tries to access some hardware addresses.
I think it's written Dell. It might also be worth noting that
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 15:43 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
But it is updated, I see Starting PC card services when I run
hw-detect. Is db_progress fully synchronous?
The display update could easily have a race.
Then I suspect that this is the case.
Yes, you're right, I thought he meant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Package: boot-floppies
Severity: important
In the new installer it is not possible to choose ftp as install source.
(minimal install CD Beta 3 from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso)
For some reasons I'm
I am using debian installer sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040228/
My machine: no special brand, assembled
Processor: Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory: I do not know the command to show memory...
Root Device: IDE
I arrived to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using debian installer sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040228/
My machine: no special brand, assembled
Processor: Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory: I do not know the command to show memory...
Root
Hi all,
I'm trying to install sarge in a old server, using the new installer.
I'm using the beta1 release and the daily from Nov 15.
The problem is: i can't get the language selection. I get a loop with
the framebuffer modules. The vga card is an very old isa non vesa 2.0
compliant.
I've
Fabio Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install sarge in a old server, using the new installer.
I'm using the beta1 release and the daily from Nov 15.
The problem is: i can't get the language selection. I get a loop with
the framebuffer modules. The vga card
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:27:02PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Polish;pl_PL;pl;PL;
Updated. new revision: 1.22; previous revision: 1.21
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:29:58 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posted to the debian-boot mailing list:
I know that the Hebrew and Icelandic texts are completely
untranslated, and would also like to have the other texts checked as
well.
But Icelandic is even misspelled ... Sorry I
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
Please check the CVS version at
URL:http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/languagechooser/languagelist.l10n?rev=HEADcontent-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup,
and send updates to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will remove the
entries without proper translations (ie the
[Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS]
Esperanto: Elektu ô ©i tion por daô¡rigi en Esperanto
Thank you. CVS is now updated.
And thank you for all the others checking entries. Still some entries
left. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
[Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS]
Esperanto: Elektu ô ©i tion por daô¡rigi en Esperanto
Thank you. CVS is now updated.
And thank you for all the others checking entries. Still some entries
left. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-10-15 13:05, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Petter!
You wrote:
Please check the CVS version at
URL:http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/languagechooser/langua
gelist.l10n?rev=HEADcontent-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup, and send
The langauge/region choices used in the new installatino system
display a translated language option. But some of these options are
not translated properly. The text was copied from the Woody
installer, and here the text contain a 'press enter' part which is
taken out of the new installer
Hi Petter!
You wrote:
Please check the CVS version at
URL:http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/languagechooser/languagelist.l10n?rev=HEADcontent-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup,
and send updates to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Dutch ones look OK, except for the final dot that probably
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please check the CVS version at
URL:http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/languagechooser/languagelist.l10n?rev=HEADcontent-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup,
and send updates to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Esperanto: Elektu i tion por darigi en
of the new installer to make it possible to use a graphical
chooser without having to confuse the users.
I know that the Hebrew and Icelandic texts are completely
untranslated, and would also like to have the other texts checked as
well. It seem to me that Catalan, Chinese (both Simplified
French OK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:16:41PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:48:50PM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:33:44 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:23:31AM +, simon raven wrote:
Better participate and make sure that
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 01:19:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
quik-installer is moderatly complicated if you want to do it right, it
needs to depend on yaboot since yaboot provides ofpath.
I have no intention to do a quik-installer, since i don't have the
hardware, so i guess that someone
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 01:09:07PM +, simon raven wrote:
any kernel that lies in the startup System\ Folder/$some_sub_dir on the mockos
classic
partition; as long as it recognises it as a linux.bin (this name can be
changed in the application resources) it'll boot.
it doesn't need to
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:22:36PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 01:19:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
quik-installer is moderatly complicated if you want to do it right, it
needs to depend on yaboot since yaboot provides ofpath.
I have no intention to do a
Le Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
Ah, and yes, Herbert has asked about that, and most probably, there will
be no 2.2.x kernels in sarge, so if you have problems with 2.4.x on your
subarch, please document it, try to provide fixes or anything, don't be
silent about
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
also .coff kernels don't even work until 2.4.23 (maybe).
ask ben herrenschmidt about that actually. seems that they do work.
yup, nobody cares about doing installer
Le Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:49:16 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
The most funny was the guy telling us to use yaboot2 and that d-i was
just crap.
who said? and if you're referring to me, that's not what i said. i said
quik was, not d-i. and besides i have no personal experience with d-i,
seems i
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:12:56AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
also .coff kernels don't even work until 2.4.23 (maybe).
ask ben herrenschmidt about that actually.
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:23:31AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:49:16 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
The most funny was the guy telling us to use yaboot2 and that d-i was
just crap.
who said? and if you're referring to me, that's not what i said. i said
quik was,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:12:56AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
also .coff kernels don't even work until 2.4.23 (maybe).
ask ben herrenschmidt about that actually.
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:12:56AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
also .coff kernels don't even work
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:07:57AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:12:56AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:07:57AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:12:56AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:20:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
check penguinppc.org/projects/quik/
Mmm, i don't really understand what quik is, from what i read at that
page, it seems it is only a linux program to set the OF variables to
load the kernel, or is it something more ? In
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:41:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
So what this boils too, is that for old-world pmac support, there is not
much to be done :
1) Kernel : create one more kernel-image udeb, which contains a
compressed vmlinux udeb for miboot.
2) boot-loader installer :
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:33:44 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:23:31AM +, simon raven wrote:
Better participate and make sure that that it works, much more
constructive that way. Also, i was refering about the person (maybe you,
i don't remember) who was telling
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:29:43 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:12:56AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 23:52:58 -0800, Ethan Benson a écrit:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
also .coff kernels don't even work
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:48:50PM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:33:44 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
No, the problem is that it is damn hard to test stuff if you don't have
the hardware for it. Especially kernels and boot-loader stuff.
well, not necessarily you
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:20:07 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
Ok, so for oldworld pmac d-i support, we really only need to fix the
initial booting stuff, and the bootloader/kernel installation step.
that's pretty much it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:12:49 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:09:22AM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:20:29 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
So you volunteer to work on yaboot2, and have answered Ethan's call for
help ?
i have offered my
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:48:50PM +, simon raven wrote:
Le Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:33:44 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:23:31AM +, simon raven wrote:
Better participate and make sure that that it works, much more
constructive that way. Also, i was
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well d-i is a bunch of little piles of crufty sh, rather then a couple
large piles of crufty C like boot-floppies.
Which in turn was a rewrite of large pile of crufty sh :)
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:01:23AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:54:40PM +0200, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
* simon raven [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-27 15:31]:
| that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported directly in the new
| installer.
maybe you can tell us
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0400, dan wrote:
Ok I think I see the overall picture now. Basically 2.2 and the old bf24 are
the only kernels small enough to fit on a floppy. Booting from cds is not
an option because that requires a proprietary bootloader. Are the following
situations
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Notice that when i asked about this on debian-powerpc, i was told that
the 2.4 kernel could be made to fit on 1.44 floppy disks. In fact, if i
look at the kernel-image-2.4.21 packages, i find that :
-
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:52:58PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:16:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Notice that when i asked about this on debian-powerpc, i was told that
the 2.4 kernel could be made to fit on 1.44 floppy disks. In fact, if i
look at the
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:33:53AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:19:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
a .coff kernel won't autoboot, the user would have to manually get
into OpenFirmware and boot it
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:40:11AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:33:53AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:19:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
a .coff kernel won't autoboot, the user
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
give up on the idea of a master kernel that works on more then one
powerpc, its not gunna happen.
Currently, the oldpamc, newpmac, chrp, chrp-rs6k, prep kernels are all
built from the same source, and with the same configuration
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:47:51AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
give up on the idea of a master kernel that works on more then one
powerpc, its not gunna happen.
Currently, the oldpamc, newpmac, chrp, chrp-rs6k, prep kernels
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0400, dan wrote:
Ok I think I see the overall picture now. Basically 2.2 and the old bf24 are
the only kernels small enough to fit on a floppy. Booting from cds is not
an option because that
[Dan Weber]
I think I need to review the steps on how he makes a bootfloppy like
that. Since I want to be able to understand it externally before I
reimplement in the DI-2.6.
I suspect your approach in making d-i handle 2.6 kernels is not the
best nor the most efficient way. Duplicating the
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:22:53AM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0400, dan wrote:
Ok I think I see the overall picture now. Basically 2.2 and the old bf24 are
the only kernels small enough to fit on
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:54:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
i just state things as i see them in the most efficient means. i
don't have time for sugar coating bullshit. if something is broken
crap ill say its broken crap.
But you have time for being crude. And calling someone retarded
To: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new installer
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.0-test5-bktree-2
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2
X-MailServer: Exim 4.22
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:43:00PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Dan Weber]
I think I need to review
[Eric Côté]
that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported directly in the new
installer.
OK. I leave that decision to you. Thanks for letting us know, so we
can avoid worrying about that architecture. If you change your mind,
please send patches or get involved to fix the remaining
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:37, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Eric Côté]
that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported directly in the new
installer.
OK. I leave that decision to you. Thanks for letting us know, so we
can avoid worrying about that architecture. If you change your mind
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:26, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:06:03PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I have begun to work on getting oldworld to boot. Basically the idea is
to take two floppies, one with the kernel and the other with the initrd
if we can fit and have the kernel be the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:28:47PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I am still maintainer of d-i 2.6 and I must do a duplicate of his
design. I wonder what size he got his initrds down to any how.
It's the bootfloppy type. Have fun.
--
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:06:03PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I have begun to work on getting oldworld to boot. Basically the idea is
to take two floppies, one with the kernel and the other with the initrd
if we can fit and have the kernel be the one kickstarting the cd. in
the following way the
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:36, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:28:47PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I am still maintainer of d-i 2.6 and I must do a duplicate of his
design. I wonder what size he got his initrds down to any how.
It's the bootfloppy type. Have fun.
What do you mean
I think this is the longest thread that debian-boot has ever had.
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:57, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:52:57PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:36, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:28:47PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I am
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:57, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:52:57PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:36, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:28:47PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I am still maintainer of d-i 2.6 and I must do a duplicate of his
Le Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 16:26:50 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:06:03PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I have begun to work on getting oldworld to boot. Basically the idea is
to take two floppies, one with the kernel and the other with the initrd
if we can fit and have the
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 20:17, simon raven wrote:
Le Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 16:26:50 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:06:03PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
I have begun to work on getting oldworld to boot. Basically the idea is
to take two floppies, one with the kernel and the
Le Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 20:20:56 -0400, Dan Weber a écrit:
Apparently its builtin into the debian-installer cvs.
run make TYPE=bootfloppy initrd
from the build dir and that should work.
Im going to review it later tonight.
simon
k, i'll take a look at too, i have some free time.
--
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 21:18, simon raven wrote:
Le Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 21:12:48 -0400, Dan Weber a écrit:
Well my intentions were to tell the bootloader to wait until it has all of
it into memory. However this may cause a requirement of 8mb
i see. so it'S be something like:
load stuff
LET IT BE KNOWN:
that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported directly in the new
installer.
i think this sucks.
1) there are plenty of still functional oldworld machines out there
2) i think it shows an utter lack of consideration for recycling, re-use
of older hardware and the environment
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:54:40PM +0200, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
* simon raven [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-27 15:31]:
| that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported directly in the new
| installer.
maybe you can tell us, what is needed to support oldworld machines
instead of writing
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:31:27PM +, simon raven wrote:
LET IT BE KNOWN:
that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported directly in the new
installer.
i think this sucks.
1) there are plenty of still functional oldworld machines out there
2) i think it shows an utter lack
Message-
From: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:55 PM
To: simon raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new installer
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:31:27PM +, simon raven wrote:
LET IT BE KNOWN:
that OldWorld PPC sub-arch will not be supported
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:01:23AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
For systems which doesn't support devfs there is a devfs wrapper, which
handle such archs.
devfs is obsolete, its use should be removed from debian-installer.
in all cases where i found lazy abuse of devfs as some sort of
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
