Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jukka Neppius wrote:
Is there any reason to test these? I haven't succeeded with boot
floppies since December.
You're guaranteed to fail right now with them unless you tell the
installer to install unstable. Same as netboot.
First I tried to install
All that problems affected my selxual activity, my
wife was not as happy as before with me.
read more
http://fast-acting.com/sv/index.php?pid=eph2145
http://medspro.net/sv/applepie.php
Package: modconf
Version: 0.2.45
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
- Considering kernel-source
- Trying kernel-source
- Cannot install kernel-source; apt errors follow:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Package kernel-source is a virtual package
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:29:27PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
Hi Sven,
could you please create a new rs6k image with the option below?
Maybe we can get now a working rs6k (b50) d-i images. :-)
Ok, i have worked this out with manty, and have a kernel that is
booting. The problems
Hi Matt,
At 27 Feb 04 01:21:48 GMT,
Matt Kraai wrote:
I'm almost novice about C language, so here is very nasty patch...
More smart patch is welcome :-)
Rather than extracting the package name from the filename, I
committed a patch that passes the package name to the function
instead.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 235068 important
Bug#235068: modconf: FTBFS: Cannot find unpacked kernel source
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 235068 important
thanks
E: Package kernel-source has no installation candidate
- Considering kernel-source-2.2.25 to satisfy the dependency
Oha.
I'd suggest using a more specific kernel-source Build-Depends like
kernel-source-2.4 or kernel-source-2.4.24. Also, the
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 27.02.2004
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-
netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux XY 2.4.33-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686
unknown
Date: 27.02.2004 12:03 (GMT+1)
Method: sarge-i386-networkinstall
Package: discover
Severity: wishlist
This was on the debian-boot mailinglist:
Subject: Re: discover == kudzu ?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:39:17PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:32:04PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I take it that discover is supposed to run all the time
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-02-27
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: Didn't get that far
Date: 2004-02-27
Method: Booted of floppyimages. Got the packets from ftp.fi.debian.org. Not
proxied.
Machine: VMWare 4.0 running on a Dell Latitude
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The translations are keeping up admirably, despite my constant attempts to
knock them all below 90%. ;-) We have 20 above that line. There is not a lot of
time in 3 weeks for a protracted string freeze, so I would like to know whter
one seems necessary
[Geert Stappers]
Hardware is constant, it doesn't make sense to check for changes on
each boot. In fact, it is even annoying.
Please disable discover after installation. It would even better to
remove the package.
I find it very convenient that it work flawlessly to move the hard
drive
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:47:44PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
At 27 Feb 04 01:21:48 GMT,
Matt Kraai wrote:
And unfortunately, I encountered another bug after this patch
applied. When bterm-unifont.postinst is executed, bogl-bterm
goes crash (Segmentation fault). Argh.
I see this as
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:00:14PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
5) * Languages with currently anecdotic work
Those are less likely to be finished. For some of these, I got
contacts but no worked has started yet.
Galician (old translations)
Irish (asked Alastair)
no (will be switch to
Dis4count Ph,armacy Onlin'e
Sa.ve up t:o %8O orde`ring your meds online
No presc:ription required
fast disc*reet s{hipping, ov(ernight nextday air
FDA & Do+ctor Ap]proved
Xan\ax - Cia(lis - Via|gra - Vali*um
Pl(ace Your Or\der Here Tod;ay
no moore
t snap duration mona hal
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2 ,2/27/04, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2004/5
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2/24/04 9:00am EST-Indiana
Method: cdrom boot, http sources
Machine: Dell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 235107 -1
Bug#235107: discover: Run only at install
Bug 235107 cloned as bug 235117.
reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug#235117: discover: Run only at install
Bug reassigned from package `discover' to `debian-installer'.
retitle -1
I tried again, this time using the CD image, and eveything worked like a
charm. Just to let you know.
Cheers,
Andrés
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:56:08AM -0800, Fabrice Gautier wrote:
--- Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:00:09AM -0800, Fabrice
Gautier wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: daily 2004-02-25
business
card and netinst.
Package: palo-installer
Version: 0.0.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please use the attached updated Danish debconf translation
# translation of palo-installer_0.0.1_da.po to Danish
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
#Translators, please read
Below information that was sended to me private.
With this message it is filed to the bugreport,
it contains the pci IDs and a pointer to
the driver of the array controller.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
- Forwarded message from beu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: beu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:56:54PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Please disable discover after installation. It would even better to
remove the package.
I find it very convenient that it work flawlessly to move the hard
drive into another host without having to modify anything to get
Jukka Neppius wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jukka Neppius wrote:
Is there any reason to test these? I haven't succeeded with boot
floppies since December.
You're guaranteed to fail right now with them unless you tell the
installer to install unstable. Same as
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 27.02.2004 image from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 27.02.2004 13:30
Method: boot from CD just single install no network no proxy
Machine: Siemens RX200 X/3.06/512 2G
Processor: Dual Xeon 3.06 HT
Memory: 4GB
Root
Updated to sarge-i386-netinst.iso 26-Feb-2004 14:05 107M
Can I say WOW! Everything up to package selection works flawlessly quickly
and intuitively. (except for the cfdisk stuff but it is still acceptable)
I am still working on the package selection part but I know that is kind a
I prefere debian-configurer / tools / languagechooser , so the user
could change the language after installation too.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Claus Hindsgaul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: palo-installer
Version: 0.0.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please use the attached updated Danish debconf translation
Don't you have CVS write access to the d-i repository?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there
I
hope youll take one of the bootlogo from Mark Riedesel or Volkan YAZICI
the only thing i hate on debian, is the nasty pink ;)
Greez
enRchi
Package: cdebconf
Severity: normal
partman had a very long title, and in the newt frontend, cdebconf did not
display any title at all at the top of the dialog box, just a uninterrupted
border. And there was a display glitch, it displayed a line drawing character on
the far left hand side of the
reassign 234812 discover
thanks
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:14:24AM +0100, Pawe Paucha wrote:
In reply to:
-
tag 234812 + moreinfo
retitle 234812 xserver-xfree86: configure script hangs
thanks
You did not include a description of your problem in the body of your bug
report.
Are
Hi everyone,
I noticed some strange things in tools/netcfg, it seems it's not
released but was labeled ``unstable'' instead of ``UNRELEASED'' in
changelog.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 234812 discover
Bug#234812: xserver-xfree86: configure script hangs
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `discover'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: partman
Severity: normal
I told partman to set up hda1 as the root partition. Then I picked free
space, and let it autopartion that, using the /, /home layout. But now
in partman I have two partitions mounted as root, the one I did
manually, and the automatically generated one.
Looks
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 06:43:59PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
I prefere debian-configurer / tools / languagechooser , so the user
could change the language after installation too.
Sorry, what are you talking about?
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Now that I've straightened out my initrd, I've managed to create this
partman patch. This modifies the main screen with a simpler, cleaner look
as I described earlier, including removing the menu items for commit and
abort. I've also made some similar changes to the active_partition screen.
Since
Quoting Ming Hua ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi everyone,
I noticed some strange things in tools/netcfg, it seems it's not
released but was labeled ``unstable'' instead of ``UNRELEASED'' in
changelog.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks so bad that I didn't try these.
Yes, but this build failure was fixed last night.
The specified Debian archive mirror is either not available, or does
not have a valid Release file on it. Please try a different mirror
Are you using a
Joey Hess wrote:
* I manually unpacked partman-auto and partman-ext3, and re-ran partman. This
added an item to the main menu, titled 10
partman-auto/text/automatically_partition doesn't exist. This may be my
error; as I did not go through anna to install this stuff. I did call
Jukka Neppius wrote:
No. I usually use own md5sum verified mirror. But I have also tried
directly ftp.fi.debian.org. If you say that 2004-02-23 files should
work, I can try again. I have not updated my mirror since latest test.
Should I check any particular file? (My md5sum check script
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:51:19PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Ming Hua ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi everyone,
I noticed some strange things in tools/netcfg, it seems it's not
released but was labeled
--- Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:56:08AM -0800, Fabrice
Gautier wrote:
--- Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:00:09AM -0800,
Fabrice
Gautier wrote:
Package: installation-reports
debian-installer_20040227_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20040227.dsc
debian-installer_20040227.tar.gz
debian-installer-demo_20040227_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20040227_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 234789 ftp.debian.org
Bug#234789: missing driver image
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `ftp.debian.org'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi there,
It looks like I have finally made a working modified version of the NetInst CD
Image with RAID1 support. This should make it a bit easier for people to test
it.
However, I do not have a proper place to put the cd image. Suggestions are
welcome :-)
Cheers,
--
Paul Fleischer //
linux-kernel-di_0.39_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.39.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.39.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386-di_0.39_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.24-1-386-di_0.39_i386.udeb
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:36:33AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Jukka Neppius wrote:
Latest test:
2004-02-25/build_floppy_root.log:
mcopy -i./tmp/floppy/root/root.img ./tmp/floppy/root/initrd.gz ::initrd.gz
Disk full
make[2]: *** [arch_root] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
Matt Kraai wrote:
Are you sure?
Pretty sure, I uploaded debian-installer images to the archive today and
everything built.
According to
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/build_floppy_root.img,
which is dated 2004-02-27T13:19:
My daily build runs just past noon GMT, so the
Every week we bring you a new amatteur gir1 and pair her with
a man with a Very huge pernis.
http://www.youdamanager.biz/qa12ws-3ed4rf/b2900-12moc-02sec2/index.html?8
Come take a look at 152 Eree picz.
We put the two of them together is a room and let her hornyness take control.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:22:32PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matt Kraai wrote:
Are you sure?
Pretty sure, I uploaded debian-installer images to the archive today and
everything built.
According to
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/build_floppy_root.img,
which is dated
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Hello,
I have an onboard Davicom Ethernet controller, that normally
should be driven via dmfe but discover misdetects it as to
be driven via tulip. This works in general but results in
massive network performance loss (tulip rx/tx 700Kbit/25Mbit
vs. dmfe rx/tx
netcfg_0.49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.49.dsc
netcfg_0.49.tar.gz
netcfg_0.49_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.49_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.49_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I think you're right. In fact, I thought this bug had been closed ages
ago :)
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 20:37, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Hi Carl,
I think this bug has been fixed long ago. We now deconfigure the network
everytime we reset it. Can you try again with new daily images from
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.49_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.49_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.49_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.49_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.49.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.49.dsc
netcfg_0.49.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.49.tar.gz
Your message dated Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:59:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#212450: has been fixed long ago...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
ddetect_0.69_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing ddetect_0.69_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#224662: fixed in netcfg 0.49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#224662: fixed in netcfg 0.49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#224662: fixed in netcfg 0.49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
While commiting the slovenian translations to aboot-installer, I saw
that this package changelog file was still messy.
Hence I decided to switch to changelogs-changes use for it.
So, translators, pleases DO NOT update this file manually FOR THIS
PACKAGE if you happen to change your translations.
60 matches
Mail list logo
