Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
If I run partman, then run it again, the second time it creates a fstab
that does not mount /proc. I don't understand the code in
create_fstab_header at all (where do the printfs go?!), so I'm stuck.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Quoting Dafydd Harries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Ar 09/03/2004 am 06:57, ysgrifennodd Christian Perrier:
I think you will commit the changes yourself as you now have a CVS
account... If needed, feel free to ask for extra commiting as I
already did some high volume commits for other languages in
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If you're OK with this, I may do the commit for you. I'm ready to do
so...
Committing
Changelog updates will be done further.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-target_9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_9.dsc
partman-target_9.tar.gz
partman-target_9_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_19.dsc
partman_19.tar.gz
partman_19_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello,
W. Borgert writes:
That message was meant for debian-boot, but didn't appear
there, so I send it directly to you. Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:47:37PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
Hello Paul and all,
today I tried your iso image, but had not the time to
complete
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
3. at least one successful installation report per boot method
I have not had time to track installation reports. Could someone take
a pass through the list of recent reports and post a summary to the list
please? My vague
tag 236995 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:52:17 -0500
Source: partman-target
Binary: partman-target
Architecture:
Accepted:
partman_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_19.dsc
partman_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_19.tar.gz
partman_19_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_19_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 236995 + fixed
Bug#236995: re-running creates fstab w/o proc
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: partman
Severity: critical
Hello,
Ok, i have been testing out partman, and it indeed seems to work just
fine on powerpc right now.
I have some gripes though, in my case i am working on an already
partitioned hard disk, actually my working harddisk, with some important
partitions.
Accepted:
base-installer_0.057.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.057.dsc
base-installer_0.057.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.057.tar.gz
base-installer_0.057_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.057_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 12:17:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:12:24PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote:
Hmm, depending on the terminal type, it may work to just print one line.
I'm thinking of something like this:
Scanning hardware..10%..20%..30%..40%..50%..
It works
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
The string freeze has not quite started, since a few strings were
changed today. Hopefully we've seen the last of that
I also just rewrote most of the strings for the cdebconf text frontend.
They should certainly be reviewed by a
Looks like we need to add these to discover-data and to usb-discover.
I've added it for usb-discover, at least, which should be enough to make
the memory stick work.
When will that end up in the cds? I'd like to do the install using for my
public talk using a stick and wireless :-)
What is
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:32:59PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the partman-palo template states that the palo partition should be in the
first 2 /Mb/
Im guessing this needs to be either MB or MiB ?
It would be 2GB (or GiB), not 2MB.
The CD should only boot on keypress, like the Windows NT (ugh!) CD does:
Please press any key to start from the Debian GNU/Linux CD,
otherwise normal BIOS boot order will continue in seven seconds.
You don't say what cd you're using, but the current daily builds only
boot on a
Quoting Erich Waelde [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:47:37PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
1. I'm a RAID/MD newbie: Is there a howto or manual about
what every single step I have to take to realise RAID1
using the installer?
If you are new to md/raid, then I would
On 9.III.2004 at 10:13 Richard Hirst wrote:
It would be 2GB (or GiB), not 2MB.
Heh. :) In the scripts it is 2GB but in the templates I made my
consecutive mistake.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
The last one I tested was Beta 2 of the install CD.
My suggestion is not just booting only on a keypress, but booting in the
normal BIOS boot order (i.e. normally hda, hdb, hdc, ...) if NO key is
pressed. Exactly like the Windows NT/2000/XP CDs do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:44:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
I would like to finish it tonight, my TODO currently contains:
- When displaying select and multiselect questions, text height must
be computed to not display more than a screen.
which is a little bit a problem if the screen
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If you're OK with this, I may do the commit for you. I'm ready to do
so...
Committing
Changelog updates will be done further.
Everything is now commited.
Changelogs have been updated (the
Quoting Dafydd Harries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
- Add Welsh entry for tools/languagechooser/languagelist.
There, you put:
Welsh;cy_GB.UTF-8;cy;GB;cy_GB:en_GB:en
However, in /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED, I only find ISO-8859-14
listed:
grep ^cy /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED
cy_GB ISO-8859-14
--
Ar 09/03/2004 am 15:24, ysgrifennodd Christian Perrier:
Everything is now commited.
Changelogs have been updated (the most painful part of the
process...mostly because this required adding several release entries
because lots of packages didn't get any change since their last update)
Thank
Ar 09/03/2004 am 15:29, ysgrifennodd Christian Perrier:
- Add Welsh entry for tools/languagechooser/languagelist.
There, you put:
Welsh;cy_GB.UTF-8;cy;GB;cy_GB:en_GB:en
However, in /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED, I only find ISO-8859-14
listed:
grep ^cy /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED
cy_GB
On 8.III.2004 22:38 at Nicholas Breen wrote:
The partitioning tool proved troublesome.
- Default partition table selection should be 'dvh'.
I think in partman it is 'dvh'.
- When editing an individual partition, the name option doesn't seem
to do anything, and any name entered in
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: March 09, 2004,
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/sparc/daily/sparc64/netboot/
uname -r: 2.4.24-sparc64
Date: March 09, 2004, 16:24 CET
Method: Bootet via DHCP/TFTP, using following command on the boot
prompt:
boot net:dhcp
On 8.III.2004 at 20:14 Joey Hess wrote:
If partman had a special case to format and swapon swap
partitions before formatting anything else, that would let the installer
run on systems with about 2 mb less memory than it currently supports.
It is not possible to swapon in some script in
Hello,
today I sat down together with an experienced Linux/UNIX admin and
we went through the complete installation with RAID1. Unfortunately,
we didn't succeed. We have two identical HDs and created four
partitions on each in an identical layout. We sat all(!) partitions
to type 'FD'. We
Hi,
I ve just downloaded the last installer ( Testing
sarge disk1 for PC i386), there are many problems :
1. the dhcp is taken by default without other
possibility. in my case there is no dhcp
2. I want to install from cd ( I have not direct
access to the interent), when I give the CD's normally
Hi folks
The following priorities are currently wrong:
- hw-detect(-full): must be lower as only usable on some arches.
- usb-discover: pulled in via dependencies.
- userdevfs: should never automaticaly installed.
- libuuid1-udeb, debootstrap-udeb, libblkid1-udeb, libc-udeb:
pulled in via
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
It is not possible to swapon in some script in commit.d, because if
some other script from commit.d fails then we will be returned to the
main menu of partman with swap turned on.
Right, this might need something like an uncommit.d to back out such
commit.d changes.
Hi folks
The following packages have broken dependencies:
- partman: hw-detect-full
- partitioner (deprecated): hw-detect-full
- many others: explicite dependencies against libdebian-install4-udeb,
libc-udeb and many more.
hw-detect-full dependency needs to be replaced with something else.
any
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
The CD should only boot on keypress, like the Windows NT (ugh!) CD does:
Please press any key to start from the Debian GNU/Linux CD,
otherwise normal BIOS boot order will continue in seven seconds.
You don't say what cd you're using, but the current
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Looks like we need to add these to discover-data and to usb-discover.
I've added it for usb-discover, at least, which should be enough to make
the memory stick work.
When will that end up in the cds? I'd like to do the install using for my
public talk
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
This is becoming very annoying for me, not only is it now three times as
much work to release large quantities of packages, but the changelogs
are bloated and wrong. Until this is fixed, I am just putting * Maybe
some translations
Bastian Blank wrote:
The following priorities are currently wrong:
- hw-detect(-full): must be lower as only usable on some arches.
Unless this causes install failures on some arches, I think it's too
complicated to get the dependencies just right to downgrade this before
the release. We would
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
The following packages have broken dependencies:
- partman: hw-detect-full
What's broken about it? It needs complete hardware detection to see all
disks.
- partitioner (deprecated): hw-detect-full
Same.
- many others: explicite dependencies against
On Sunday 07 March 2004 17:56, Erich Waelde wrote:
[snip]
I managed to set up a /target tree on lvm on raid1 on scsi, but base
install failed (could not download coreutils), and no smoke test has taken
place. See below for details.
To summarize: I found all the neccessary tools! Good work!
Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
This is becoming very annoying for me, not only is it now three times as
much work to release large quantities of packages, but the changelogs
are bloated and wrong. Until this is fixed, I am just putting
Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:36:50 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of partman-target 9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Sven Luther wrote:
chrp, chrp-rs6k and prep will be working this time around, i think
everything is there, but i need to fiddle the build system for it still
to build the initrd images, but i do this already by hand, and
everything is in place for it. This would use the powerpc netboot
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:13:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm also considering downgrading baseconfig-udeb, since only experts
should use it anyway. Also possibly autopartkit, for similar reasons,
and to save memory.
The same with partitioner and the progs for the filesystems which can be
partman-target_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_10.dsc
partman-target_10.tar.gz
partman-target_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi.
I'm currently trying to update Sarge install manual to reflect the
reality. Of course, I've read INSTALLATION-HOWTO, but that reflects
current state, not intended state. So, could somebody kindly help me
with the following?
1. Will we have boot images for 1.2 inch floppies on i386?
2. Will
I managed to track the problem down to bterm, which segfaults. I could
use the installer passing the boot option
debian-installer/framebuffer=false.
This bug seems to be related to #232720.
Many thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen (pere) on irc (#debian-boot).
regards,
Reinhard
--
To
Accepted:
partman-target_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_10.dsc
partman-target_10.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_10.tar.gz
partman-target_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_10_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
partman_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_20.dsc
partman_20.tar.gz
partman_20_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Feb 27, 04 purchased Dell 8300. Pen 4/ 3GHZ/ 120 HD/ 1024 memory.
I am not a computer expert. I have had nothing but problems with this machine
since I purchased it. When I log on the System 32 window opens up and I get
an error message from McAfee that states that the Active Shield is missing
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:15:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
The following packages have broken dependencies:
- partman: hw-detect-full
What's broken about it? It needs complete hardware detection to see all
disks.
disc-detection? Real package alway overrule Provides, so
partman-basicfilesystems_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_15.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_15.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
partman_20.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_20.dsc
partman_20.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_20.tar.gz
partman_20_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_20_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Quoting Dafydd Harries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'll try and get cy with UTF-8 listed as supported in glibc. In the
meantime, what should be done?
I'm not completely sure. Maybe replacing it by ISO-8859-14 is
wise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Miroslav Kure wrote:
I'm currently trying to update Sarge install manual to reflect the
reality. Of course, I've read INSTALLATION-HOWTO, but that reflects
current state, not intended state. So, could somebody kindly help me
with the following?
1. Will we have boot images for 1.2 inch
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.
This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and tell us
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_15.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_15.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_15_all.udeb
to
- lowmem package must enter archive
- Check archive for udebs that need to be built on various arches;
make sure everything is up-to-date. Also, make sure that eg,
appropriate kernel debs have entered the archive on each
architecture.
one thing I noticed with a recent daily build
On 9.III.2004 at 11:44 Joey Hess wrote:
However swap can be turned on in the scripts that do mkfs and turned
off back in them. I am going to do this.
Well I guess that would work.
I added to definitions.sh two new functions: enable_swap and
disable_swap. I added them to
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
What about doing something with the mount.d script output? It seems
that is designed to allow undoing of mount.d changes, but currently
it's thrown away and we have this more hardcoded umount_target
instead.
This was designed to work for filesystems like UMSDOS
netcfg_0.52_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.52.dsc
netcfg_0.52.tar.gz
netcfg_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.52_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Title: Vous souhaitez vous implanter à létranger
Vous
souhaitez vous implanter à létranger? Réduire votre fiscalité?
Contactez
nous dès aujourdhui au:
001
775 201 0191
Notre société est spécialisée dans lincorporation
internationale dentreprises et vous fera bénéficier dune offre
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.52_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.52_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.52.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.52.dsc
netcfg_0.52.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.52.tar.gz
100% zh_CN (Merged PO file: 905t1f)
100% uk (Merged PO file: 905t1f)
100% sk (Merged PO file: 902t4f)
100% lt (Merged PO file: 905t1f)
100% ko (Merged PO file: 904t2f)
100% ja (Merged PO file: 902t4f)
100% fr
100% fi (Merged PO file: 904t2f)
100% da (Merged PO file: 904t2f)
100% bg
On 9.III.2004 at 13:35 Joey Hess wrote:
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
What about doing something with the mount.d script output? It seems
that is designed to allow undoing of mount.d changes, but currently
it's thrown away and we have this more hardcoded umount_target
instead.
This was
Hi,
W. Borgert writes:
Hello,
today I sat down together with an experienced Linux/UNIX admin and
we went through the complete installation with RAID1. Unfortunately,
we didn't succeed. We have two identical HDs and created four
partitions on each in an identical layout. We sat
I get server not responding.
This means dead links from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/:
- no manual (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/)
- no CVS repository tarball (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/cvsrepo.tar.gz)
- no ???
Is this a known problem? Are there alternatives available?
When updating my working copies of d-i and tasksel, I get loud complaints
from the SSH transport:
The RSA host key for cvs.alioth.debian.org has changed,
and the key for the according IP address 192.25.206.28
is unknown. This could either mean that
[snip]
It is also possible that the RSA host
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:00:26PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:44:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
I would like to finish it tonight, my TODO currently contains:
- When displaying select and multiselect questions, text height must
be computed to not display
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:01:29PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 8.III.2004 22:38 at Nicholas Breen wrote:
The partitioning tool proved troublesome.
- Default partition table selection should be 'dvh'.
I think in partman it is 'dvh'.
At least as of version 17 (most recent on my mirror
The attached patch corrects the parameters sent to genisovh[1] in mips's
build_miniiso target. After doing so, the image is bootable and appears
to be installing normally.
genisovh is still unpackaged - the path I'm calling it from certainly
won't work for anyone else. The only obvious
Frans Pop wrote:
I get server not responding.
Your dns is out of date.
192.25.206.28 cvs.alioth.debian.org alioth.debian.org d-i.alioth.debian.org
Could I get CVS access to d-i on my alioth account fjpop-guest as Translator?
Done.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Nicholas Breen wrote:
The attached patch corrects the parameters sent to genisovh[1] in mips's
build_miniiso target. After doing so, the image is bootable and appears
to be installing normally.
genisovh is still unpackaged - the path I'm calling it from certainly
won't work for anyone
netcfg_0.53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.53.dsc
netcfg_0.53.tar.gz
netcfg_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.53_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-09 from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2004-03-09
Method: base packages from cd, then security upgrade from inet.
Machine:
Processor: P4 (Prescott/HT) 2.8GHz
Memory: 512MiB
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.53.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.53.dsc
netcfg_0.53.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.53.tar.gz
ddetect_0.73_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.73.dsc
ddetect_0.73.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.73_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.73_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.73_all.udeb
archdetect_0.73_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-09
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I tried to install a diskless client and mount an nfs-root-partition.
(No harddrives inside the diskless client, rootfs should be on my
server). First Problem: nfs-modules aren't loaded or reachable in
netcfg_0.54_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.54.dsc
netcfg_0.54.tar.gz
netcfg_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.54_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
archdetect_0.73_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.73_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.73.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.73.dsc
ddetect_0.73.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.73.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.73_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.73_all.udeb
So I'm running a test install and notice kernel-image-2.4.24-amiga-di
being installed as a d-i component. Hmmm, I say, my mac should never
need that particular kernel and why would the boot image need a kernel
anyway -- it's already booted.
I believe it's because some linux-kernel-di modules
[Debian Installer]
Accepted:
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
to
pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
to
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.54_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.54_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.54.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.54.dsc
netcfg_0.54.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.54.tar.gz
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.tar.gz
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
Package: discover-data
Version: 1.2004.02.08-2
Severity: important
Debian-Edu was told about some PCI ids which uses the hpt366 kernel
module. Here is a patch to update pci.lst:
Index: debian/changelog
===
RCS file:
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 21:36, Joey Hess wrote:
Your dns is out of date.
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/
Right. The DNS-servers of my provider are not yet in sync :-(
I commented out the forwarders in my local DNS-server config. Success!
Could I get CVS access to d-i on my alioth
Accepted:
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:38:23PM -0500, Nicholas Breen wrote:
Package: installation-reports
#236970.) Fortunately, this also turned up a different problem:
the kernel-image-2.4.22-r5k-ip22 package had been installed, which
will not boot on this machine! Installing the r4k-ip22 image
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: i10n
Attached is a Swedish translation of discover's debconf template.
--
Andr Dahlqvist
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:38:23PM -0500, Nicholas Breen wrote:
Package: installation-reports
#236970.) Fortunately, this also turned up a different problem:
the kernel-image-2.4.22-r5k-ip22 package had been installed, which
will not boot on this machine!
Package: discover
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-09
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
Hi,
could you please add this translation into German?
Thank you!
Dennis
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections
Nicholas Breen wrote:
The attached patch corrects the parameters sent to genisovh[1] in mips's
build_miniiso target. After doing so, the image is bootable and appears
to be installing normally.
Thanks. Duplicated work btw, a similiar thing is sitting on my disk.
genisovh is still unpackaged
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:09:09PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:38:23PM -0500, Nicholas Breen wrote:
Package: installation-reports
#236970.) Fortunately, this also turned up a different problem:
the kernel-image-2.4.22-r5k-ip22 package had been installed,
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 07-Mar-2004, from
http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/current/
uname -a: I'm on different install, now
Date: 08-Mar-2004
Method: from floppy then network on a previously prepeared ext3
OK got these off the machine by floppy.
Maybe someone can spot a problem ?
If there's anything else which would help please let me know.
---
/var/log/boot:
Tue Mar 9 23:07:08 2004: bootlogd.
Tue Mar 9 23:07:08 2004: Loading /etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz
Tue Mar 9 23:07:08 2004: Activating
The partman-lvm stuff has a few rough edges, but it works. I have never
set up lvm before, and know nothing about it, and I just booted a debian
system with /usr in a lvm volume.
One question: Does it support root filesystem on lvm?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lvmcfg_0.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lvmcfg_0.18.dsc
lvmcfg_0.18.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.18_all.udeb
lvmcfg-utils_0.18_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:15:55PM +0100, Johannes Behr said
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 19:02, Joey Hess wrote:
Johannes Behr wrote:
OK, works better --- but still not through.
boot, network/DHCP setup, loading of installer components from
a mirror works.
The hardware-detection
partman-lvm_3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_3.dsc
partman-lvm_3.tar.gz
partman-lvm_3_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
partman-basicfilesystems_16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_16.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_16.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_16_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
