Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sparc beta3
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: 4/11/2004
Method: cdrom
Machine: Sun Ultra2 Creator 3d
Processor: 2 x 200Mhz
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: SCSI - replaced hard drive. Previous was /dev/sda
Root
On Sunday, April 11, 2004, at 01:56 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok.
Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ?
Only by
those built by Jeremie. We need to find out why. Jeremie, did you
modify
the kernel
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040410
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/current/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
(2004-04-10) ( MD5=21e4902c4ece557fc192fe2e94fa3862 )
uname -a:
Date: 2004-04-11 15:00 (GMT+10)
Method: cdrom,
Package: installation-reports
Version: sparc 20040410
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/current/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
(2004-04-10) ( MD5=21e4902c4ece557fc192fe2e94fa3862 )
uname -a:
Date: 2004-04-11 15:00 (GMT+10)
Method:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 02:35:28AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sunday, April 11, 2004, at 01:56 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok.
Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ?
Only by
those built by
merge 242343 243122
quit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libdebian-installer
Severity: serious
Version: 0.21
Tags: patch
From my build log:
...
debian/rules build
AUTOMAKE=automake-1.8 ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.8 \
autoreconf -i -v
/bin/sh: line 1: autoreconf: command not found
make: *** [configure] Error 127
Adding automake1.8, autoconf,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:13:07PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 8.IV.2004 at 03:37 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
I will look at partman-newworld after a few days.
I have commited the changes. Notice however that the new
partman-newworld can work properly only with the new partman packages
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 02:13:50AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 16:02, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
This is OldWorld PowerMac.
Booting off of floppy uses the miboot bootloader. It's not like lilo or
grub on i386. There's
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:52:11PM -0700, Mark Demma wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK its good to finally hear from someone, even if it is bad news.
Unfortunately I have neither the money more programming skills to make
Well, you clearly are not poor money less
libdebian-installer_0.21.1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.21.1.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.21.1.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
Je suis actuellement absente
Pour toute urgence merci de contacter le standart 04 38 38 80 00
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 04:17:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243128: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.21.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi,
I apologize to Malte. You were right. I was wrong. The kernel on the
floppies seems to be broken.
Ok.
Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ? Only by
those built by Jeremie.
I can
lör 2004-04-10 klockan 03.58 skrev Joey Hess:
[...]
The above is nearly the minimal testcase to reproduce this. The set -x,
the INFO line and the final db_get can be removed and it will still happen.
The progress bar must have been brought up, or the bug will not occur.
Right. A bug in the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 240373 wishlist
Bug#240373: installs kernel-image package
Severity set to `wishlist'.
merge 240373 240410
Bug#240373: installs kernel-image package
Bug#240410:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
I apologize to Malte. You were right. I was wrong. The kernel on the
floppies seems to be broken.
Ok.
Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
make it work with the boot floppies
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:30:19 +1000 (EST), Vincent McIntyre wrote:
The installer cd boots ok, and gives me a welcome prompt.
I hit return to start the installer.
That's bound to fail currently...
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
...entering 'linux root=/dev/rd/0 rw' at the
Hi,
[why Sven's boot-floppies don't boot while Jeremie's do]
Ok, we need to find out what is happeining here. Will we have a (or
more) oldworld machines at the Munich BSP ?
On saturday (the whole day) and sunday morning I can participate via IRC.
BTW, Jeremie, maybe you would be interested
Package: kbd-chooser
Severity: grave
Followup-For: Bug #242489
This is not yet fixed, and rather urgent. I will upper the severity on
this one, since it is not acceptable that this remains unfixed so long.
I will also search for a fix, but in the meantime, it is good it is
submitted.
Apr 11
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
[why Sven's boot-floppies don't boot while Jeremie's do]
Ok, we need to find out what is happeining here. Will we have a (or
more) oldworld machines at the Munich BSP ?
On saturday (the whole day) and sunday morning I
GROUP securiQ.Watchdog
Server: ATVIEK1
---
Ihr Mail-Bestandteil enthielt Anhänge, die wegen ihres Typs oder ihrer
Größe unzulässig sind. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie Ihren Administrator
I seem to have most things working on amd64 now. It properly
boots, gets in the menu, retrieves some files from the archive.
It downloads a few of them and then makes me go to the shell.
I think I'm missing some udebs, but I have no idea which. Is
there some lists of all the udebs that I need?
Hello,
I apologize for cross-posting but I have sen
I am trying to boot and install debian on my MCP750.
I am having issues booting the initrd's that I have found on the debian web-site.
I tried the cd installations and have been unsuccessful getting;
PPC1-Bugpboot 14 50
Booting from:
Looking For Mortg.age? You are already
APPR.OVED by us!
Just spend several seconds to fill short fo.rm and get at least 10
offers with less than 3.2% ra.te!
Submit n o w!
rem ve www.yourchanceathome.net
cuglddn uzsmbzs. bhbcy lawrg gfzwfnh gjjmx wtxqdd lorhy qghzvnubg
knbch twblog qrervck,
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040410/
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.25-1-386
Date: 2004-04-11 15:05 (+1)
Method: CD image
Machine: Compaq Proliant 800
Processor: 2xP2 400MHz
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: SCSI - Smartarray2
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I seem to have most things working on amd64 now. It properly
boots, gets in the menu, retrieves some files from the archive.
It downloads a few of them and then makes me go to the shell.
I think I'm missing some udebs, but I have
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso (first release of 2004/3/15)
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.25 GNU/Linux i486 and i686 (hand-configured kernel after
install)
Date: 18/3/2004
Method: Two installations.
One i686 booting from CD, network install from
Is there any particular reason why netcfg maps 127.0.0.1 to the
hostname in /etc/hosts? I.e.:
127.0.0.1 myhost localhost
This makes reverse lookups quite confusing, as you expect 127.0.0.1 to
be mapped to localhost, not to the hostname. I know that GNOME and
possibly other programs need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 243122 debian-cd
Bug#243122: installation-reports: boot failure on sparc (ultra 10)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'.
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 243167 libdebian-installer
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `libdebian-installer'.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 241237 grave
Bug#241237: d-i (20040315) failure on Compaq RAID
Bug#232413: Kernel install fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug#232415: mkinitrd fails on cciss drive hardware
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 243167 grave
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Severity set to `grave'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
merge 241237 243167
Bug#241237: d-i (20040315) failure on Compaq RAID
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Bug#232413: Kernel install fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug#232415:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 243167 mapdevfs still fails for Smartarray2
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
[Instead of directly CC'ing you Joey, I'm cross-posting to debian-boot]
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:54:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I just want to make sure that you hppa folk realise that hppa is further
from having a working installer for sarge than any architecture aside
from perhaps s390.
Kyle McMartin wrote:
[Instead of directly CC'ing you Joey, I'm cross-posting to debian-boot]
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:54:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I just want to make sure that you hppa folk realise that hppa is further
from having a working installer for sarge than any architecture
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/current/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: N/A
Date: 2004 April 11 13:00 EST
Method: boot from CD, hold c, select install-power4 and
install-safe-power4
Machine: Apple G5
Processor:
Crocker,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.8006hosting.com/cd/
teahouse,lengthening the shadows.
Well, some people at Debian are very much interested in
SW-RAID. If only to use it on their Atari ST.
Paul, it would be absolutely great, if your current work
would go into d-i SVN. Even if you think, that it's not
perfect yet. Your ISO didn't work for me, but if you put it
in SVN, other
Package: linux-kernel-di-sparc
Version: 0.53
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
joey:~dpkg --contents
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-sparc32-di_0.53_sparc.udeb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2004-03-21 14:21:38 ./
I don't know what if anything is supposed to be in this udeb, but it
should not be empty.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Daily snapshot, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040408/
uname -a: Linux
debtst3 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: Date and time of the install
2004.04.08
(afternoon/evening)
Method:
- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:39:56 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Sun,
- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:34:23 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Sun,
- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:38:57 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Sun,
- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:46:39 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Sun,
kernel-wedge_1.7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_1.7.dsc
kernel-wedge_1.7.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_1.7_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_1.7.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.7.dsc
kernel-wedge_1.7.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.7.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_1.7_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.7_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your
Is it partman that takes care of creating /etc/fstab in the installation
target?
Just wondering if it's worthwhile getting with the times (compared to Red
Hat) and using filesystem labels or UUIDs in /etc/fstab instead of block
devices? It's certainly better for SCSI systems when a disk fails.
I
$B$$$D$b$4MxMQ$$j$,$H$$4$6$$$^$9!##D#V#DHNGd$N%%m%o%s$G$9!#(B
$B$3$N%a!%k$O0JA0$K$49XF~$5$l$?J}$KFCJL$K$*Aw$j$9$k$b$N$G$9!#(B
[EMAIL PROTECTED];%C%H$r$4MQ0U$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B$J$s$H#7Kg#1K|1_$G$9!#$$R$4MxMQ$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B\$7$/$O#H#P$r$4Mw$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:58:14 +0200
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I apologize to Malte. You were right. I was wrong. The kernel on the
floppies seems to be broken.
Ok.
Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
make it work with the
main-menu_0.064_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
main-menu_0.064.dsc
main-menu_0.064.tar.gz
main-menu_0.064_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(*) Recently the term USian has been dramatically gaining in popularity
around the world.
Can you actually demonstrate this?
AFAICS, `USian' is a mildly pejorative[*] term used mainly by
usenet/slashdot types, and is essentially never used in the `real
Accepted:
main-menu_0.064.dsc
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.064.dsc
main-menu_0.064.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.064.tar.gz
main-menu_0.064_i386.udeb
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.064_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
partman_30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_30.dsc
partman_30.tar.gz
partman_30_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
partman-auto_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_15.dsc
partman-auto_15.tar.gz
partman-auto_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
* Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-12 10:05]:
Is it partman that takes care of creating /etc/fstab in the
installation target?
Yes, at least on those platforms using partman (some, such as mips and
s390 will continue to use partconf which uses the partconf-mkfstab
package for
Accepted:
partman_30.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_30.dsc
partman_30.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_30.tar.gz
partman_30_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_30_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 220990 237009 238363 238381 238386
tag 220990 + fixed
tag 237009 + fixed
tag 238363 + fixed
tag 238381 + fixed
tag 238386 + fixed
tag 238389 + fixed
tag 238712 + fixed
tag 239388 + fixed
tag 239430 + fixed
tag 239445 + fixed
tag 239561 + fixed
tag 239648 + fixed
tag 240145 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in
Accepted:
partman-auto_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15.dsc
partman-auto_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15.tar.gz
partman-auto_15_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 240411
Thank
partman-basicfilesystems_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
partman-basicmethods_13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicmethods_13.dsc
partman-basicmethods_13.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_13_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
debian-installer_20040411_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20040411.dsc
debian-installer_20040411.tar.gz
debian-installer-manual_20040411_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20040411_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 220990 + fixed
Bug#220990: Mips uses different numbers for dvh partitions than SGI/fdisk
There were no tags set.
Bug#238363: Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips)
Bug#239648: [mips] Doesn't give proper numbers to the partitions
Tags added:
grub-installer_0.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_0.40.dsc
grub-installer_0.40.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.40_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman-ext3_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_21.dsc
partman-ext3_21.tar.gz
partman-ext3_21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-reiserfs_9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-reiserfs_9.dsc
partman-reiserfs_9.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_9_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
partman-lvm_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_10.dsc
partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
partman-lvm_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
partman-partitioning_17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_17.dsc
partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
Fill in date and from where you got the image
---
2004-04-11
From
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
Located on this web page:
Accepted:
partman-basicmethods_13.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_13.dsc
partman-basicmethods_13.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_13.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_13_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb
to
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240411: fixed in partman-auto 15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Title: re finan cing
Got B'ad Cr'edit?
Let us help you refi'nance your home.
- Lowest Inte'rest Ra'tes Avail'able'!
- Get a P're-App'roval in 48 hours for FREE
- Refin'ancing for the Se'lf-Empl'oyed
- Sa've $100-$400 per month and s'kip ONE pay'ment
Our ea'sy appli'cation
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Someone mentioned UUIDs on IRC the other day and it sounds
interesting; but can you give a specific example for those you've
never seen this before?
I've never used UUIDs, but here for example is the setup with labels on
my 4-drive scsi server:
/dev/sda1 /
partman-target_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_15.dsc
partman-target_15.tar.gz
partman-target_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
partman-xfs_9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_9.dsc
partman-xfs_9.tar.gz
partman-xfs_9_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Accepted:
partman-xfs_9.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_9.dsc
partman-xfs_9.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_9.tar.gz
partman-xfs_9_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_9_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239387: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
tag 238060 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:27:57 -0400
Source: partman-target
Binary: partman-target
Architecture:
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238383: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
partman-target_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_15.dsc
partman-target_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_15.tar.gz
partman-target_15_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_9.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_9.dsc
partman-reiserfs_9.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_9.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_9_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_9_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#235371: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
partman-ext3_21.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_21.dsc
partman-ext3_21.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_21.tar.gz
partman-ext3_21_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_21_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your
Accepted:
grub-installer_0.40.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.40.dsc
grub-installer_0.40.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.40.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.40_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.40_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238062: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238385: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
partman-lvm_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_10.dsc
partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
partman-lvm_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_10_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 238382
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_17.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_17.dsc
partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_17_all.udeb
to
tag 238382 + fixed
tag 240298 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:25:59 -0400
Source: partman-lvm
Binary: partman-lvm
tag 235367 + fixed
tag 235505 + fixed
tag 239208 + fixed
tag 239435 + fixed
tag 239557 + fixed
tag 239562 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date:
Mathieu Roy wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Nederland means low land. The Slovak term for low land would be another
possible name for the country.
I am surprised to hear there is no official translation of Netherlands
in Slovakia.
I have done just a search with google, and
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-11
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta3/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux imac 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven mar 19:29:26 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-04-12, very early morning
Method: Installed from
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-11
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta3/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux imac 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven mar 19:29:26 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-04-12, very early morning
Method: Installed from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 238382 + fixed
Bug#238382: After LVM configuration forgets all assigned methods and mount-points
There were no tags set.
Bug#240298: Forget mount points after LVM-configuration
Tags added: fixed
tag 240298 + fixed
Bug#240298: Forget mount points
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 238060 + fixed
Bug#238060: partman: Needed symbol help
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:07:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:07:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
