Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 202907
Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
John wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I'm doing a network install via modem.
I've discovered d-i downloading, amongst others, jfs and lvm udebs.
I won't be using either, so this is simply wasted time.
I suggest that downloading and installing optional udebs be deferred
until it's
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 260296 + l10n
Bug#260296: [INTL:nl] updated dutch po-debconf translation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: l10n
tags 256678 + l10n
Bug#256678: ja.po update
There were no tags set.
Tags added: l10n
tags 261476 + l10n
Bug#261476:
#include hallo.h
* Debian Bug Tracking System [Thu, Jul 29 2004, 11:03:04PM]:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 202907
Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages
Haha. Now you stumble around the problem that I have predicted years
ago, requesting conditional
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:56:16PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Author: wouter
Date: Thu Jul 29 18:56:16 2004
New Revision: 18729
Added:
trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console
Modified:
trunk/packages/rootskel/debian/changelog
[Bastian Blank]
This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it
if it is not fixed within the next hours.
The patch in the mail you quote only move the code around. How can it
be more broken that the original?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
John Summerfield wrote:
The 2.6 kernel from Jul 2 (I think from Sid) doesn't detect my IDE
drive. According to the log, the IDE modules are missing.
2.4 of the same date does detect it.
I don't have logs to offer, and I'm about to look for newer vmlinuz
and initrd.gz.
The problem does not
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 09:42:49AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Bastian Blank]
This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it
if it is not fixed within the next hours.
The patch in the mail you quote only move the code around. How can it
be more broken that
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 09:38]:
Make serial console work on 2.2.
This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert
it if it is not fixed within the next hours.
Now you know how it feels when you revert other people's special
cases.
Your shut down
[Bastian Blank]
The Makefile decides to install different versions of this file.
Yes. And that should still work for s390? Or am I misunderstanding
something here?
BTW: Perhaps it is a good idea to drop the makefile magic, and merge
the two versions into one file doing runtime detection of
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:55:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#262190: arcboot-installer must call apt-install dvhtool (?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:00:23AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Your shut down cdebconf fix didn't work on serial console installs,
btw.
Which fix? There real fix is disabled because of #258877.
Bastian
--
Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say,
Today I will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 236423 hotplug
Bug#236423: discover: sprays lots of daunting error messages during boot
Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `hotplug'.
tags 236423 - help
Bug#236423: discover: sprays lots of daunting error messages during boot
reassign 236423 hotplug
tags 236423 - help
thanks
Hi,
I've done some more investigation, and added a placemarker echo line to the
end of /etc/init.d/discover, and the ich2rom modprobe attempt occurs well
and truly after /etc/init.d/discover has finished, so the problem is no
longer discover.
It
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:04:22AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Bastian Blank]
The Makefile decides to install different versions of this file.
Yes. And that should still work for s390? Or am I misunderstanding
something here?
He does not port the magic.
Bastian
--
I have never
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 10:15]:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:00:23AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Your shut down cdebconf fix didn't work on serial console installs,
btw.
Which fix? There real fix is disabled because of #258877.
So why did you not put my workaround
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
So why did you not put my workaround back in place for the meantime?
You mean the progress stop workaround?
This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which is
already fixed, not the complete shutdown cdebconf
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 09:38:18AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:56:16PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Author: wouter
Date: Thu Jul 29 18:56:16 2004
New Revision: 18729
Added:
trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console
Modified:
I'm network-installing on an HP Vecra by modem.
Since this is my first (successful so far) install using the Jul 29 Sid
version, it needed to pull stuff through my modem instead of of my
Squid cache.
During most of the time to download the kernel, the progress meter was
stuck on 87%.
If I'd
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 11:11]:
You mean the progress stop workaround?
Yes.
This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which
is already fixed, not the complete shutdown cdebconf case.
Okay, but it seems the fix doesn't work. (With sid images from a
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:35:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Author: wouter
Date: Thu Jul 29 18:58:45 2004
New Revision: 18730
Modified:
trunk/packages/rootskel/src/sbin/init
Log:
Whoops, forgot the most
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
powerpc 20040724 businesscard
OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
Comments/Problems:
The
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:30:24PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I'm network-installing on an HP Vecra by modem.
Since this is my first (successful so far) install using the Jul 29 Sid
version, it needed to pull stuff through my modem instead of of my
Squid cache.
During most of the
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:32:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I don't know of a good way to avoid this at this time; debconf's
handling of the seen flag for the noninteractive frontend is basically
correct; debootstrap's use of the noninteractive frontend is correct,
and there's no way d-i can
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:28:41AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Are you talking about S30term-linux-s390? That file I haven't touched,
so it should still work. I'm sorry, but unless you could explain a bit
more, I don't see what the problem is.
Okay, scratch that, sorry. Note to self: read
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.00
Severity: minor
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040729/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Method: boot from .iso
Machine: emulator running on i386 WinXP
at boot prompt hit return
in the menu [!!] Choose a language:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:30:24PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I'm network-installing on an HP Vecra by modem.
Since this is my first (successful so far) install using the Jul 29 Sid
version, it needed to pull stuff through my modem instead of of my
Squid cache.
During
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:33:03AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 11:11]:
This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which
is already fixed, not the complete shutdown cdebconf case.
Okay, but it seems the fix doesn't work.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:58:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Okay, scratch that, sorry. Note to self: read the list before replying
to private Cc's. Saw it, and saw your fix, too; I'll take more care next
time.
fyi: a similar patch was already in my todo. note to myself, better shut
up.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Busybox init tries to access those devices over and over again, issueing
an error message every time it fails.
Ah, okay. Please open a bug against busybox-cvs.
Bastian
--
Women are more easily and more deeply terrified ...
There may be more, not these stand out:
On the boot commandine I specified vga=6
This should be incorporated into the grup config.
For the stage 1 install, I specified a proxy. This should be carried
forward into the apt config.
atm I'm wondering how to get stuff into it. apt-get says Connect 113
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:46:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: debian-installer
Version: daily netinst cd of 20040729
Severity: minor
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040729/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Method: boot from floppies
Machine: emulator running on i386 WinXP
The floppy images
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040729,
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso
uname -a: 2.6.7-5-amd64-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian
1:3.3.4-3)) #1 Thu Jul 15 02:11:18 CEST 2004
Date: 20040730
Method
On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 05:34 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
powerpc 20040724 businesscard
OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 01:46:37PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
atm I'm downloading bits of the 2.4 kernel; the above was with 2.6. I
note its downloading lots of kernel modules. I booted off a LAN, why not
justput those modules in the initial ram disk?
AFAIK boot image size is only a
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a: Linux Pademelon 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:Fri Jul 30 2004
Method: Network, tftp-PXE from LAN, ftp.wa.au.debian.org via proxy on LAN
Machine: HP PII Vectra VL509 mobo, BX
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 01:46:37PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
atm I'm downloading bits of the 2.4 kernel; the above was with 2.6. I
note its downloading lots of kernel modules. I booted off a LAN, why not
justput those modules in the initial ram disk?
AFAIK boot image
Hi Kevin
As mentioned on my site, please send all questions and bug reports about
the installer to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't mail me in private
mail about that. See below for my answer:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:23:42AM -0400, Kevin C. Baird wrote:
I had a little problem with the Beta 4
OTOH, I am curious how well other UTF-8 locales work.
I had changed ko_KR.EUC-KR to ko_KR.UTF-8 in languagechooser months ago,
because UTF-8 locale has some advantages to Korean language users (11172
chars more Hangul chars). But now I am about to change it back to
ko_KR.EUC-KR.
Many programs
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:23:42AM -0400, Kevin C. Baird wrote:
The ~1Mb boot partition for multi-booting needs to be HFS, not
Apple_Bootstrap, as might seem logical.
It has to be both. Apple_Bootstrap is the partition type
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 08:52, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 05:34 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
powerpc 20040724 businesscard
OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
INSTALL REPORT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 261927 serious
Bug#261927: tasksel installes extra packages in 'desktop' task
Severity set to `serious'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 202907 tasksel
Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages
Bug reassigned from package `aptitude' to `tasksel'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 202907 aptitude
Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel, general' to `aptitude'.
End of message, stopping
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source)
This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze.
** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 **
** to the list of packages
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040729 sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: not able to run
Date: 20040729 late evening CDT (US)
Method: downloaded iso, burned to CDROM, booted CDROM
Machine: MB- Gigabyte GA-8KNXP Rev.2
Processor: Intel P4 2.8c (not overclocked)
Memory: 1
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
[2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source)
This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze.
** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 **
** to the list of packages installed by d-i. **
You meant to file a bug on debootstrap, and
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source)
This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze.
The base dependencies were (supposed to be)
tasksel_2.08_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.08.dsc
tasksel_2.08.tar.gz
tasksel_2.08_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Accepted:
tasksel_2.08.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08.dsc
tasksel_2.08.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08.tar.gz
tasksel_2.08_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08_i386.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 261927
Thank you for your contribution to
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261927: fixed in tasksel 2.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 262348 kernel
Bug#262348: Installer report 20040729 version -- auto reboot problem
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 262266 serious
Bug#262266: [i386] device driver floppy to big
Severity set to `serious'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory
configuration (32M) fails: control characters that don't make sense to
the 3270 terminal are spewed across the screen, effectively obscuring
whatever it's trying to tell me, and the installation appears to hang.
I don't have
reassign 262344 debootsrtap
retitle 262344 debootstrap: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
thanks
You meant to file a bug on debootstrap,
*sigh*. :-/
and it is too late to make changes to debootstrap for the next d-i
release, which will probably be the final release for sarge.
That
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 14:04]:
** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 **
** to the list of packages installed by d-i. **
You meant to file a bug on debootstrap, and it is too late to make
changes to debootstrap for the next d-i release, which will probably be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 262200 wishlist
Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages
Severity set to `wishlist'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hi,
Martin Michlmayr:
libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are
installed),
Really? It's not even in testing yet, was not built on all arches until
today, and somebody (vorlon*) told me it needs to be in testing before
being eligible for debootstrap.
but libgcrypt7
Adam Thornton wrote:
Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory
configuration (32M) fails
How realistic is that? I thought s390 were big iron?
: control characters that don't make sense to
the 3270 terminal are spewed across the screen, effectively obscuring
I want to install Debian Woody with installer \'boot-floppies\' version 3.0.23
2002-05-15. I have problems with my SATA sil 3112 rev. 2 and I have only SATA disk and
on my CD with drivers is supported only 2.4.19 and 2.4.22 kernels (on distro CD set is
only 2.2.20 and experimental 2.4 and
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:40:14 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Just forwarding this around because it's interesting.
- Forwarded message from Knut Yrvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Knut Yrvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:21:30 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: [Discuss] installer
Organization: Skolelinux
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 14:43, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam Thornton wrote:
Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory
configuration (32M) fails
How realistic is that? I thought s390 were big iron?
Yeah, but if you're running under VM, your virtual machine can be
* Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 21:26]:
libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are
installed),
Really? It's not even in testing yet, was not built on all arches until
today, and somebody (vorlon*) told me it needs to be in testing before
being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241106
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in March, I would very much
appreciate it, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241212
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in March, I would very much
appreciate it, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241133
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in March, I would very much
appreciate it, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241179
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in March, I would very much
appreciate it, if
Adam Thornton wrote:
Yeah, but if you're running under VM, your virtual machine can be quite
small. 32M is perfectly reasonable for a machine that is going to, say,
be a router for a virtual network. Your physical box is going to be a
great deal larger, but your virtual machine doesn't have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241516
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in April, I would very much
appreciate it, if
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:38:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#241634: success, some issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:58:18 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#241757: general success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/boot.img
uname -a: Linux caradhras 2.4.26-32-smp #1 SMP Sun Jun 20 20:45:33 CEST 2004 parisc
GNU/Linux
Date: July 28, 2004.
Method: netboot from local tftpd
Machine: HP B180L+
Processor:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 262270 nobootloader
Bug#262270: Installation Report (AMD64)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `nobootloader'.
retitle 262270 failed to use sed from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 261722 xserver-xfree86
Bug#261722: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xserver-xfree86'.
retitle 261722 problem configuring X
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:15:51 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line thanks for your report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 261527 netcfg
Bug#261527: no subject
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 261571 partman
Bug#261571: installation-report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
tags 261571 d-i
Bug#261571: installation-report
There were
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 262387
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 261527 loop in manual coniguration
Bug#261527: no subject
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
México D.F. a 30 de julio del
2004
A quien corresponda:
Por medio de la presente quiero manifestar lo siguiente:
Soy un ciudadano que desea lo mejor para sus hijos. Y en ese animo estoy convencido
que el DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:38:53 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line your report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
The problem with tasksel installing too much has been fixed today. I
suppose the only remaining problem in this report is no dsl automatic
config.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 262387
thanks
Kyle McMartin wrote:
System had mdetect installed, which tried to pull in read-edid,
which obviously didn't work.
I missed this when I closed the report before. How didn't it work?
/var/log/base-config.log should have a log of whatever happened.
--
see shy jo
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:47 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:14 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Thanks for the reminder.
You can close this bug report. The ask for floppy driver module
twice (and not fined it at all bug is still present, but I've
mentioned it in other bug reports that reference more current CD
images, so there's no need for this one.
Enjoy!
Rick
On Friday, July 30,
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-29 current from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a: Linux enoch.gear.dyndns.org 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04
EDT 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2004-07-30 19:30 AEST
Method: How did you install? From
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:19:44PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241133
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in March, I would very
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:41:03PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Busybox init tries to access those devices over and over again, issueing
an error message every time it fails.
Ah, okay. Please open a bug against busybox-cvs.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 262387 base-config
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:43:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
reopen 262387
thanks
I missed this when I closed the report before. How didn't it work?
/var/log/base-config.log should have a log of whatever happened.
read-edid is only available in i386.
Cheers,
--
Kyle McMartin
--
To
Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:43:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
reopen 262387
thanks
I missed this when I closed the report before. How didn't it work?
/var/log/base-config.log should have a log of whatever happened.
read-edid is only available in i386.
Since
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 08:36:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Since base-config 2.37 that should only result in a warning message and
mdetect should still be installed; before that mdetect would not be
installed if read-edid was not available. Any particular problem with
how it works now, besides
Dear boot friends,
I still cannot do the following at first screen:
expert26 hd=7296,255,63
and end up with the right geometry in the partion section. When I choose,
show c,h,s information, it still gives the info based upon the 16 sectors.
Am I doing something wrong? The help says it will
Package: installation-reportsDebian-installer-version: 7/24/2004, debian.uchicago.eduuname -a: Unable.Date: 7/30/2004 @ 2317CDTMethod: Floppy install w/ Net-DriversMachine: HP Vectra 4/66Processor: P83 ODPMemory: 64MBRoot Device: IDE 17.2GBRoot Size/partition table: 1GB /, 16GB /homeOutput
Hi,
This is probably as good a place to start introducing myself eh ? :)
I'm James Mills (aged: 22) of Australia, QLD. I am currently studying
Software Engineering at Griffith University.
I have now used Debian for almost 4 years and run various Debian
Routers, Servers and Desktop machines
98 matches
Mail list logo
