Steve Langasek wrote:
The community does not prefer Reply-To.
John Summerfield wrote:
Where are the latest voting results on the matter?
Is voting done per-list, or overall?
I guess that The community above means the Debian Lords
and Deities; and that is fine for this debian-boot list.
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hi,
Subject says it all. This shouldn't happen, since the quik bootloader
is completely useless for PReP machines. What is more, the machine
rebooted directly after that, giving me no chance to drop into a shell
and make the system bootable by hand
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hi,
apparently, the latest build (20040802) lacks a couple of low-level
SCSI modules, among them scsi_transport_spi.ko. This hit me
yesterday, when installing on a IBM RS/6000 43P-100, and as a result,
the system didn't find its hard disks. I looked
Ryan Underwood wrote:
- Is is possible to include memtest86 on the install CD as a boot option?
One of the first things I do when installing a new machine is to check
that everything is sane. In this case, Linux crashed when booting the
first time. When I made a memtest floppy, I found that
Glenn McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 00:07:16 -0500
Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Should ntpdate be included as part of the base install?
pool.ntp.org
is rather reliable, and it helps to have one's clock in a sane state
so that tar does not complain about timestamps being in
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.09
Severity: normal
In version 2.00, the tex task was removed, and the changelog says:
/---
| Adopted new, stricter criteria for task additions. Removed the following
| tasks, which did not meet it: [...] tex
\---
I
A p proval Letter
Daryl
Trusted Bank Group
Ref: 49149
Sir:
this letter is to confirm that you have been a.pproved
to ref i nance for a
conventional mor t gage at 3.75% pending completion
of your application.
We have verified that you fit our mor t gage guidelines
to qualify for our low
ra
Package: install
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-generic
netboot install (with the Aug 2 image) does work flawlessly now, but
after the reboot, the bootp is done again. I'd expect the bootloader
installer not only to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 262868 partman
Bug#262868: no 'FREE SPACE' in newly initialized disklabel
Bug reassigned from package `partman-partitioning' to `partman'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
reassign 262868 partman
thanks
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:32:51PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
I have two disks on my Sun SPARCstation 10, sda and sdb. sda is a 1 GB
drive which I chose to initialize with a fresh disklabel for the
purposes of testing.
However:
xSCSI1 (0,3,0)
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/d-i/images/mips/2004-07-25/r4k-ip22/netboot-boot.img
uname -a: Linux nn126 2.4.25-r4k-ip22 ... mips unknown
Date: 3.8.1004 10:50
Method: netboot
Machine: SGI Indy
Processor: R4600 V2.0
Memory: 60 MB
Root
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/mips/20040802/sarge-mips-netinst.iso
uname -a: Die Ausgabe, wenn Sie »uname -a« auf der Befehlszeile ausführen
Date: 3.8.2004 10:00 (+0200)
Method: external SCSI CDROM (IBM Type 7210-001)
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/2004-07-29/boot.img
uname -a: Linux nn125 2.4.26-32-smp #1 SMP Sun Jun 20 20:45:33 CEST 2004 parisc
GNU/Linux
Date: 3.8.2004 11:00 (+2)
Method: netboot
Machine: hppa
Processor: PA-RISC 1.1e
Package: partman
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:07:16AM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
- In the partitioning menu, I finished partitioning and went to Go
Back to go back to the main menu. Unfortunately, I didn't know this
was equivalent to a Cancel action, and lost my changes after a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 01 August 2004 19:22, Akkana Peck wrote:
Frederik Dannemare writes:
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241179
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Comments/Problems:
When selecting to install from cdrom it says and affirming to have inserted the cdrom
I get the error message Installation tools not found. This is most likely
a problem with the cdrom.
Hm, Debian has no IRIX-style installation tools. What
Title: J Group Festival
INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL
Invitation to International
children and youth music festival in Southern Bohemia.
20.08 - 22.08.2004 - festival Festive
time
20.08. Ceské Budejovice námesti
Otakara II (centrale square)
21.08. Ceský Krumlov námestí Svorností
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 240679 -1
Bug#240679: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config
Bug 240679 cloned as bug 263226.
reassign -1 cdrom-checker
Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 263187 netcfg
Bug#263187: installation-reports
Warning: Unknown package 'report'
Bug reassigned from package `bug report' to `netcfg'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
begin quotation of John Summerfield on 2004-08-03 15:39:43 +0800:
Ryan Underwood wrote:
- Is is possible to include memtest86 on the install CD as a boot option?
One of the first things I do when installing a new machine is to check
that everything is sane. In this case, Linux crashed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 13:44, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
On Sunday 01 August 2004 19:22, Akkana Peck wrote:
Frederik Dannemare writes:
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 22:43, John Summerfield wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
Personally, I use: CTRL+L to reply to list.
Thunderbird lacks that option.
So did Evo. I added the CTRL+L to do the reply to list.
I really thought T-Bird had a function for it.
/me looks...
/me doesn't find
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:33:53PM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
I was wondering if you all were aware of the brokenness of the beta4
powerpc installer. Also the 2.6 powerpc installer seems to fail on
hardware auto detection.
Please don't waste your time using beta4 on powerpc. We're
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 263157 quik-installer
Bug#263157: debian-installer: Tries to install quik on RS/6000 PReP system
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `quik-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 263157 quik-installer
thanks
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:47:43AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Subject says it all. This shouldn't happen, since the quik bootloader
is completely useless for PReP machines.
I wonder why I thought it was useful on PReP ... I'll fix this, thanks.
--
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 22:43, John Summerfield wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
Personally, I use: CTRL+L to reply to list.
Thunderbird lacks that option.
So did Evo. I added the CTRL+L to do the reply to list.
I really thought T-Bird had a function for it.
/me
- Forwarded message from andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:56:45 +0200
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#262874: Package: installation-reports
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
Hi Joey,
booting the
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 240679 -1
Bug#240679: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config
Bug 240679 cloned as bug 263226.
reassign -1 cdrom-checker
Bug#263226: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config
Bug reassigned from
1. Using tasksel simplifies the installation of many packages through
tasks... It seems that you don't want to let the users select their
tasks by them self (except for several task as desktop and a few
servers). Please let people the option to choose which i18n l10n
packages they want.
Can't you
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message
details were:
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = I wait for an answer!
Scanning time = 08/03/2004 16:22:38
Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/947
Action taken on message:
The attachment
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:28:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
This means that parted doesn't recognise the disk label of sda.
/var/log/partman can say whether this is the same bug as #249371 or
something unknown.
No, I initialized it by higlighting sda in partitioning, hitting enter,
and
Rick Thomas wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
The test
checklist in installer/doc/checklist is still missing many entries and
the more complete it is the better I'd feel about calling this release
rc1 instead of beta5.
If you'll send me a pointer (URL?) to the test checklist, I'll try to
Rick Thomas wrote:
Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken If you
choose to manually configure the network (don't use DHCP) the
installer keeps coming back to the configure network step, and if
you force it to move forward, after the reboot, the network is not
configured.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/d-i/images/mips/2004-07-25/r4k-ip22/netboot-boot.img
- rebooting
when preparing to reboot it says:
Saving installation logs to /var/log/debian-installer/...E: Inimplemented function
and stops. When killing
Frank Kuester wrote:
I could not find those criteria written in any of the bug reports, or
in /usr/share/doc/tasksel. There was also no explanation why
specifically the tex task (and the science task, too) was removed.
I would be happy to cooperate with you and provide a new, better tex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 16:23, Joey Hess wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 240679 -1
Bug#240679: [i386] [beta3] [unknown] no network config
Bug 240679 cloned as bug 263226.
To document the irc-discussion it is:
setenv SystemPartition scsi(0)cdrom(X)partition(8)
setenv OsLoader r4k-ip22
boot
The original external scsi drive I tried gave strange timeout
messages, but could ls the bootfiles on it. The next try with
some internal scsi drives in an scsi-tower lead to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 13:44, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
On Sunday 01 August 2004 19:22, Akkana Peck wrote:
Frederik Dannemare writes:
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040803 16:55]:
Are you sure that you got the 2004-07-25 build and not some other one?
Looks like the 2004-07-25 arrived in the wrong directory so tftpd
served an old image. Sorry for the confusion.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Frederik Dannemare wrote:
Sorry. The new info regarding failing checksums from submitter Stuart
Scharf is hidden in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263226msg=9 below
the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, submitters have a bad habbit of only replying back to me when
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/mips/20040802/sarge-mips-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux nn126 2.4.26-r4k-ip22 ... mips GNU/Linux
Date: 3.8.1004 17:00 (+0200)
Method: cdrom: the last internal scsi cdrom in the internal bus
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
To document the irc-discussion it is:
setenv SystemPartition scsi(0)cdrom(X)partition(8)
setenv OsLoader r4k-ip22
boot
For reference value, you can also do this in one line without changing
any variables:
boot -f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242010
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in April, I would very much
appreciate it, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242128
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in April, I would very much
appreciate it, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242221
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in April, I would very much
appreciate it, if
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:23:51AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:28:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
This means that parted doesn't recognise the disk label of sda.
/var/log/partman can say whether this is the same bug as #249371 or
something unknown.
No, I
Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#242256: success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Am Monday 26 July 2004 18:46 schrieb Frederik Dannemare:
If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report.
Much has changed with the installer since April, and it is not unlikely
that the problems you mention have been dealt with by the Debian
Developers working on the
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:47:43AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hi,
Subject says it all. This shouldn't happen, since the quik bootloader
is completely useless for PReP machines. What is more, the machine
rebooted directly after that, giving
Just a thought, maybe the xdebconfiguratior script-package is already
capable to set up X according to the locale? I did just a basic -core install
of X.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just tried this again using the vmlinuz and initrd.gz found at
http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/monolithic
but instead of using a local mirror created from a downloaded CD iso I
used a real mirror (ftp.us.debian.org as a mirror) and it worked
flawlessly.
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:51, Joey Hess wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken If you
choose to manually configure the network (don't use DHCP) the
installer keeps coming back to the configure network step, and if
you force it to move forward,
Steve Glines wrote:
I just tried this again using the vmlinuz and initrd.gz found at
http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/monolithic
but instead of using a local mirror created from a downloaded CD iso I
used a real mirror (ftp.us.debian.org as a mirror)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 261703 + d-i patch
Bug#261703: discover1-data: Marvell 643[46]0 builtin ethernet driver.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i, patch
severity 261703 important
Bug#261703: discover1-data: Marvell 643[46]0 builtin ethernet driver.
Severity set
CC to xdebconfigurators
Ok, the man page suggests xdebconfigurator is capable to take the locales into
account when setting up the X keyboard.
The version that is in sarge did not seem to set the keyboard model for german
systems to pc105, and the Variant to nodeadkeys though.
Kind Regards,
tags 261703 + d-i patch
severity 261703 important
thanks
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 07:53:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Package: discover1-data
Version: 1.2004.07.18
Severity: normal
Please apply this patch :
patch --
--- pci.lst.orig 2004-07-27
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 August 2004 07:39, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
31 2004 00:27 Frederik Dannemare (a):
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241212
I'm currently processing old
Package: installation-reports
I've finished an installation with the latest floppies from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/
Everything went smoothly except for one (or maybe two) thing. The
language was not set at second stage. When I checked in the
questions.dat file,
base-config_2.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.40.dsc
base-config_2.40.tar.gz
base-config_2.40_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
base-config_2.40.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.40.dsc
base-config_2.40.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.40.tar.gz
base-config_2.40_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.40_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your
A while ago partman seemed to support lvm over raid or raid over lvm
(forget which). In my recent testing, it no longer offers raid as an
option when editing a partition on lvm, or the inverse. Is this
intentional, or a bug?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 263317 languagechooser
thanks
Not sure if languagechooser is right, but it's somewhere in there.
FWIW, I worked around this in termwrap by making it try to strip the
@euro if it can't find a valid locale with it. I would like to see d-i
be fixed but I don't understand how this part of
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 24-07-2004, Beta-4
uname -a: Linux brat-bori 2.6.7 #1 Tue Jul 6 20:56:55 CEST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 03-08-2004
Method: How did you install? What did you boot off? If network
install, from where? Proxied?
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-03 17:10]:
A while ago partman seemed to support lvm over raid or raid over lvm
(forget which). In my recent testing, it no longer offers raid as an
option when editing a partition on lvm, or the inverse. Is this
intentional, or a bug?
I don't think it
Joey Hess wrote:
At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are
overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to
catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24 hours, we've gotten
builds for hppa, ia64, s390, and sparc, plus a manual build for
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I don't think it ever offered it. IMHO it's a bug in parted for not
offering the right flags, but maybe partman should just work around
it. It would certainly be good to provide support for lvm on raid
since many people want this feature.
It did offer it before. IIRC
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 18:02, Joey Hess wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I don't think it ever offered it. IMHO it's a bug in parted for not
offering the right flags, but maybe partman should just work around
it. It would certainly be good to provide support for lvm on raid
since many
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-03 18:02]:
It did offer it before. IIRC during DebConf4 we tested it and 2.4
worked, while with 2.6 something segfaulted.
No, this was lvm and raid together on the same disk but on different
partitions. 2.6 had problems because lvm2 segfaulted when the md
Leszek Koltunski wrote:
only problem: I've got an onboard AC97 sound card, which I do not use. I
use a PCI C-Media card instead. Both were detected and both drivers (
ac97_codec and cmpci ) were loaded. However, I needed to rmmod both of
them and modprobe cmpci back in order for sound to work.
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-03 18:02]:
It did offer it before. IIRC during DebConf4 we tested it and 2.4
worked, while with 2.6 something segfaulted.
No, this was lvm and raid together on the same disk but on different
partitions. 2.6 had problems
Your message dated Wed, 4 Aug 2004 01:01:04 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240721: localisation set during install is not active afterwards
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
debian-installer_20040801_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-manual_20040801_powerpc.deb
debian-installer-images_20040801_powerpc.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242338
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in April, I would very much
appreciate it, if
Rejected: no source found and Architecture line in changes mention source.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Dear developers of autopartkit,
your package allows easy setup of the debian-edu school server -- even to
unexperienced teachers. This is worth a lot.
However, at the current state of the art, installation can cost 200 $ more
than needed, as upsizing partitions afterward takes its time and
I think this has happened to other users also but the reason is unknown.
In order to make the situation more clear it will be helpful if you can
post the contents of the directory /var/log of the installer. In the
installed system you can find it saved in /var/log/debian-installer.
Thanks
Ralf Gesel|ensetter wrote:
[snip]
Why not define a well defined interface how to define a linear equation or the
like on how to define each partition's size? Something like what I proposed
at http://bugs.skolelinux.no/show_bug.cgi?id=774
Another way could be to have a minsize and a maxsize
quik-installer_0.0.6_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
quik-installer_0.0.6.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.6.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.6_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Your message dated Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:32:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#263157: fixed in quik-installer 0.0.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
quik-installer_0.0.6.dsc
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.6.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.6.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.6_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.6_powerpc.udeb
Announcing to
Dear Home Bu y e r:
Congratulations! You have been pre -
appr.oved for a new home mortga g e.
Below are the specifications of your approv a l
Lo a n Type: Conventional
Interest Ra t e: 3.5%
Term: 360 months
Sales Price: $250,000 (Maximum)
Down Paym e n t: 10%
Lock-in Period: 45 days
Closing
81 matches
Mail list logo
