Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

Adam D. Barratt (2022-02-19): > That looks fine to me, but will need a d-i ack as the package builds a > udeb; tagging and CCing accordingly. No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member --

Re: Bug#1006165: bullseye-pu: package tasksel/3.68+deb11u1

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2022-03-14): > That seems reasonable enough, but for completeness I'd appreciate a > KiBi-ack ("don't be silly, Holger knows what they're doing" counts ;-) > ) Looks good to me, thanks. Holger, sorry I haven't been able to answer your questions when you first started

Re: Bug#1006192: bullseye-pu: package espeak-ng/1.50+dfsg-7+deb11u1

Samuel Thibault (2022-03-14): > d-i doesn't usually spit out large amounts of text so the problem was > not really showing up there, the effect won't really be noticed. No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager --

Bug#1007776: authemtication of wireless network after password input fails

Hi Peter, and thanks for your report. A couple of things: please avoid sending HTML messages in general. And since you included a large picture (by mailing list configuration standards), your report was not delivered to our list. Peter Mueller (2022-03-16): > I tried to install unofficial (due

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 19:29 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2022-03-17 17:49:04 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > > On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > > >

Re: Bug#1007714: bullseye-pu: package openssh/1:8.4p1-5+deb11u1

Adam D. Barratt (2022-03-17): > As openssh builds a udeb, I'm CCing KiBi and tagging the bug > accordingly. Making sure upgrades have a chance to work properly seems more important than any possible regressions at install time, for those deploying over SSH, so no objections at all. Cheers, --

Re: Bug#1007838: d-i.debian.org: Installer iSCSI does not work in Debian 11

Control: reassign -1 open-iscsi 2.1.3-5 Control: affects -1 debian-installer Control: tag -1 d-i Hi, Reports against d-i.debian.org are usually about our infrastructure and tooling, you could have filed the report against debian-installer instead, which makes for a better default package. :)

Processed: Re: Bug#1007838: d-i.debian.org: Installer iSCSI does not work in Debian 11

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 open-iscsi 2.1.3-5 Bug #1007838 [d-i.debian.org] d-i.debian.org: Installer iSCSI does not work in Debian 11 Bug reassigned from package 'd-i.debian.org' to 'open-iscsi'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1007838 to the same values

Re: Bug#1005949: bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u3

Adam D. Barratt (2022-03-15): > This looks OK to me, thanks. Looks fine to me as well, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#1007838: d-i.debian.org: Installer iSCSI does not work in Debian 11

Hi All, This looks like a duplicate of: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003366 Same issue (but with more diagnostics). Thanks Eugene On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 08:48, Debian Bug Tracking System < ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: > Processing control commands: > > > reassign -1

Re: Bug#1007746: buster-pu: package glibc/2.28-10+deb10u1

Adam D. Barratt (2022-03-17): > Please go ahead, thanks. > > As glibc produces a udeb, I'm tagging the bug and CCing accordingly. No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance

Re: Bug#1006187: bullseye-pu: package espeakup/0.80-20+deb11u1

Samuel Thibault (2022-03-14): > No because in d-i espeakup is started by hand, the systemd service file > is not installed in the .udeb. > > d-i doesn't usually start large amounts of process in parallel so it's > not a problem there. No objections anyway, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On Wed, 2022-03-09 at 08:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2022-02-19 17:57:25 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Feel free to upload; we'll wait for the d-i ack before accepting > > the > > package into p-u. > > There will be the release of 1.1.1n on Tuesday 15th March 2022 >

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#1007838: d-i.debian.org: Installer iSCSI does not work in Debian 11

Thanks Eugene, Eugene Losowski-Gallagher (2022-03-18): > This looks like a duplicate of: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003366 > Same issue (but with more diagnostics). Since one isn't supposed to be using iscsid within the installer, I'd suggest dropping it from the udeb

Bug#1004292: debian-installer:s390x: installer fails to format dasd disc on s390x systems

Hi Dipak, Dipak Zope1 (2022-03-12): > I have completed the installer testing for dasd and zfcp and this is > the only outstanding item for s390x installer. I would recommend it > for backporting. This is great news. > The merge request: >

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 14:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2022-03-18 09:21:50 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Apologies if the status here got confused - based on the above, I > > was > > assuming that in the absence of a negative response you would > > proceed > > with the

Bug#1005693: marked as done (Installation of sid failed because of network configuration failure)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:04:23 + with message-id <6668648351417fa5600c585d7bc69ddb87a1cb86.ca...@posteo.de> and subject line Installation is now successfully has caused the Debian Bug report #1005693, regarding Installation of sid failed because of network configuration failure

Bug#1007776: authemtication of wireless network after password input fails

I apologize; so far, unable to. (I found no option to switch to plain text from HTML in the Web interface, and my e-mail client so far failed to send from that domain for an unknown reason.) The last message got through, though, from my e-mail client, so the sending failure is apparently

Processed: Bug#1004292 marked as pending in s390-dasd

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1004292 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer:s390x: installer fails to format dasd disc on s390x systems Added tag(s) pending. -- 1004292: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004292 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processing of s390-dasd_0.0.74_source.changes

s390-dasd_0.0.74_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-dasd_0.0.74.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.74.tar.xz s390-dasd_0.0.74_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1004292: marked as done (debian-installer:s390x: installer fails to format dasd disc on s390x systems)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:36:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004292: fixed in s390-dasd 0.0.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004292, regarding debian-installer:s390x: installer fails to format dasd disc on s390x systems to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1007776: authemtication of wireless network after password input fails

Dear Cyril, thanks for the quick answer! On 18.03.22 09:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi Peter, and thanks for your report. A couple of things: please avoid sending HTML messages in general. And since you included a large picture (by mailing list configuration standards), your report was not

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On 2022-03-18 09:21:50 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Apologies if the status here got confused - based on the above, I was > assuming that in the absence of a negative response you would proceed > with the 1.1.1n-0+deb11u1 plan. For complete clarity, please feel free > to do so, bearing in

s390-dasd_0.0.74_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:12:26 +0100 Source: s390-dasd Architecture: source Version: 0.0.74 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois Closes: 1004292

Processed: Re: Bug#1007701: tasksel: [INTL:id] [l10n] [patch] update Indonesian translation

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1007701 [tasksel] tasksel: [INTL:id] [l10n] [patch] update Indonesian translation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1007701: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: Bug#1007707: Update Indonesian translation

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1007707 [win32-loader] Update Indonesian translation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1007707: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007707 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Fri 2022-03-18 09:13:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Unfortunately it looks like the upload failed: > > gnupg2_2.2.27-2+deb11u1.dsc: Refers to non-existing file > 'gnupg2_2.2.27.orig.tar.bz2.asc' Sigh. thanks for the note. I've just tried again, this time including the orig.tar.bz2.asc in

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:22:57PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2022-03-18 14:51:32 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Boo. Hope you're doing better. > > Thanks, yes. > > > > I would also do the upload for Buster, would that work? I remember > > > that > > > the packages, that

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On 2022-03-18 14:51:32 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Boo. Hope you're doing better. Thanks, yes. > > I would also do the upload for Buster, would that work? I remember > > that > > the packages, that broken, were already uploaded a few cycles ago. > > Also as 1.1.1n? Yes. > I assume there

Re: Bug#1000355: bullseye-pu: package nano/5.4-2+deb11u1

Control: tags -1 + d-i The changes are probably beneficial to the use of nano-udeb as well, but in any case tagging and CCing for inforamation. On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 18:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:29:56AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:

Bug#1007928: grub-installer: support for arm64 EBBR systems

Package: grub-installer Version: 1.182 Hello, On arm64 EBBR style systems with U-boot + EFI API the persistent variable store can, unfortunately, be read-only when boot time services have finished[1]. Meaning that Linux is unable to set EFI variables. Would it be possible to please add logic

Bug#1007928: Please ignore the email disclaimer

Hello, A quick one to say apologies for the "IMPORTANT NOTICE" email disclaimer in my previous email. This can safely be ignored. I'll be more careful with my email software in future. Cheers, -- Steve

Bug#1007929: netcfg: FTBFS on s390x

Source: netcfg Version: 1.177 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer, Your package failed to migrate for 60 days, hence I spotted it. It fails to build from source on s390x. I hit the giveback button once because looking at the failing test result I suspected it is "just" a flaky test.