Moritz Lennert wrote:
The install CD boots perfectly, but when it comes to detecting the
cd-rom device it tells me that there is no cd in the drive or that I
have to install it manually. When I try a manual install with the
'cdrom' driver it does not work.
I have an IDE cdrom-drive that
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta1-Business Card Install
uname -a: N/A
Date: 12/05/2003
Method: Booted from Business Card Machine
Machine: Homebrew
Processor: Celeron 400
Memory: 128 MB
Root Device: WDC36400
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda1
On 5.XII.2003 at 12:09 Joey Hess wrote:
One thing it does not seem to consider is that some would like to keep a
record of how they partitioned one machine and use it to automate
partitioning on others.
This seams to be a nice feature to ask from the automatic partitioner.
On the first
On 5.XII.2003 at 22:55 Thorsten Sauter wrote:
... but what's your plan for archs/subarchs which are currently not
supported by libparted?
They have to use some more traditional. Which architectures are not
supported by libparted?
Btw, are there any screenshots available? (I'm to lazy to
Package: cdrom-detect
Version: 0.38
Tags: patch
The udeb produced by this source package is Architecture: all, so it
should be generated by the binary-indep target, not by binary-arch.
Patch follows:
diff -ru cdrom-detect-0.38.orig/debian/rules cdrom-detect-0.38/debian/rules
---
Package: baseconfig-udeb
Version: 0.020
Tags: patch
The udeb produced by the source is Architecture: all, so it should be
generated by the binary-indep target, not by binary-arch.
Patch follows:
diff -ru baseconfig-udeb-0.020.orig/debian/rules baseconfig-udeb-0.020/debian/rules
---
Package: prebaseconfig
Version: 0.42
Tags: patch
The udeb produced by this source package is Architecture: all, so
it should be generated in the binary-indep target, not in binary-arch.
Patch follows:
diff -ru prebaseconfig-0.42.orig/debian/rules prebaseconfig-0.42/debian/rules
---
Package: iso-scan
Version: 0.06
Tags: patch
The udebs produced by this source package are both Architecture: all, so
they should be generated in the binary-indep target, not in binary-arch.
Patch follows:
diff -ru iso-scan-0.06.orig/debian/rules iso-scan-0.06/debian/rules
---
Package: userdevfs
Version: 0.03
Tags: patch
This package produces an udeb which is Arch: all, so invoking
binary-arch should not do anything (currently, binary-arch depends
on binary-indep, which is wrong).
[ While we are at it, the comment saying this builds a .udeb would fit
much better in
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
The idea is that this script has to do the translation alone. In can
do it using debconf, gettext or by some other means. One script can
output many menu items and this makes imposible to assign to each of
them some debconf template. Consider the choices script that
Hi
I've received an email from Microsoft...attaching the December 2003
patch88.exe. MSN email has deleted the attachment...saying they detected a
virus. Now what do I do? Where do I go online and get the new
patch.
Thanks much
Pattie Finley
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Christian Perrier wrote:
Critical work to do: discover (221302, FTBFS found while trying to NMU, I'm
unable to correct this alone and I can't upload anymore due to GPG key
compromission)
There is a patch in the bts from Thomas
12 matches
Mail list logo
