Dear Christian,
Many Thanks for the quick reply...It had been very helpful
.
Hmmm, interesting to learn that some activity occurs in
Mongolia. Would you mind pointing these people to me in case they
would be interested in working on Debian localization?
I ll ask them to contact you in
(cc'ing you just in case but answering to the mailing list only is fine)
Here
there are lots of team collaborating on it such as Bangladesh, Nepal,
Mangolia etc...
Hmmm, interesting to learn that some activity occurs in
Mongolia. Would you mind pointing these people to me in case they
would
I would say just do things like the D-I installation manual but tht
makes a short answer.:)
Yes I agree with you on this... I just wanted to know the technical aspect
of how the D-I installation manual are created. Hope this helps...
Well, on that specific topic, the best is probably
We can use the wiki in the meantime to collectively work out an
agenda [2] for the meeting.
Please also register yourselves as attendees so that we can get a
rough picture of who will attend the meeting.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings/Coordination
signature.asc
Hi
I'd like to know if any progress was recently made towards packaging
DirectFB 1.0.
DirectFB 1.0, among many improvements and fixes over version 0.9.25 like
better touchpad support, provides a new method
(DFBWindow::DetachEventBuffer () ) which is needed by a patch which was
recently
package: rootskel-gtk
severity: wishlist
tags: patch
DirectFB allows to set [1] the way the desktop window buffering
mechanism works by disabling the backend buffer.
The result, in my experiments, was saving some some hundreds KB of
memory with no noticeable drawbacks.
I propose to apply the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
retitle 387512 [etch-beta3] Only asks one time for GRUB password
Bug#387512: [etch-beta3] Only asks on time for GRUB password
Changed Bug title to `[etch-beta3] Only asks one time for
I haven't played with Debian since Woody and I'd like to say how
excellent I feel the current (stable) installer is. It seems very
polished. I'm glad I can still use the newt interface, hehe, guess I'm
old fashioned. I like that it's so accesible to customization and I
hope the plan is to keep
GARDUL VIU-MINUNE!!!
Creste rapid (1.20-1.80 m/an)!!!
E incredibil de nepretentios!!! (atât în privinta solului cât si a îngrijirii)
E incredibil de ieftin!!!
Capacitate de umbrire excelenta!
Capacitate antipraf de un grad înalt!
Este o planta foioasa, de culoare verde viu, cu frunze mici
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:03:47PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi!
A few weeks ago in Edinburgh, members of the debian-installer team
discussed about getting back the habit of having monthly online
meetings [1].
Here is a proposition for the next IRC meeting:
Wednesday, 25th of July, 19:00
On Saturday 14 July 2007 13:52, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
May I suggest Saturday 28 July at 20:00 UTC. Saturdays at 20:00 UTC
was the most common date for d-i meetings during 2004 and 2005.
That's not entirely true:
- we alternated between Wednesdays and Saturdays
- most of those meetings
Craig Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The documentation in the Wiki says that I should be able to exclude
udebs using ./.disk/udeb_exclude. I was dissapointed to find that
doesn't seem to work. I can exclude udebs by removing their entries in
the the status and Package files, but I don't
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.18_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.18.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.18.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.21-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.18_mips.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.21-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.18_mips.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.18_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.18_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.18_mips.udeb
to
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: Netboot (via replacement firmware)
Image version:
http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-arm/rc2/images/iop32x/netboot/n2100.bin
Date: Sat Jul 14 15:00:00 EST 2007
Machine: Thecus N2100
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:15:46 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#433109: installation-reports: Successful installation on
Thecus N2100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:33:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 09:44, Robert Millan wrote:
Ok, but please let's not make a big fuss of this. The udebs were just
added to the archive, not to D-I.
And you also added them to all CD images...
Doesn't extra priority move
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:17:32PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
About the udebs, I agree that would be better to have a message on
Debian Boot mailing list about them, before asking for them to be
build but I also think that noone need to know about that. We ought
write it on Developers
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:21:06PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 09:54, Robert Millan wrote:
I'd like to request that the gnu-fdisk and gnu-cfdisk packages be added
to^W^Wkept in the D-I section of the Debian archive. There is a small
use case in which this is useful:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
We do still plan to keep looking for a smaller alternative.
You might be interested in:
http://www.netbsd.org/contrib/soc-projects.html#tiny-dhcp
I don't know the current status, but it might be worth keeping an eye on.
--
Robert
On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:03, Craig Block wrote:
I'm attemping to set up a custom network d-i CD for a new computer.
Nothing critical, just a machine I might want run Debian once in a
while. I need the CD to boot with and install a newer kernel verison
(for chipset/disk support).
On Saturday 14 July 2007 20:18, Robert Millan wrote:
You might be interested in:
http://www.netbsd.org/contrib/soc-projects.html#tiny-dhcp
I don't know the current status, but it might be worth keeping an eye
on.
Thanks. I've added a link to that on
On Saturday 14 July 2007 11:15, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
DirectFB allows to set [1] the way the desktop window buffering
mechanism works by disabling the backend buffer.
The result, in my experiments, was saving some some hundreds KB of
memory with no noticeable drawbacks.
I propose to apply
On Saturday 14 July 2007 08:14, Christian Perrier wrote:
Yes I agree with you on this... I just wanted to know the technical
aspect of how the D-I installation manual are created. Hope this
helps...
Well, on that specific topic, the best is probably looking in the
manual/ directory in D-I
On Thursday 12 July 2007 20:59, Matheus Morais wrote:
netcfg module is responsible to write
/etc/network/interfaces at installation time right? Why use
allow-hotplug instead auto in network configuration file?
Mostly because it improves support for laptops which may not always be
connected to
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:33:35 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432787: installation report of Thinkpad X60
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 20:59, Matheus Morais wrote:
netcfg module is responsible to write
/etc/network/interfaces at installation time right? Why use
allow-hotplug instead auto in network configuration file?
Mostly because it improves support for
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 21:22, Jeroen Maris wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I have tried this installation five or six times now, and I have been
able to reproduce a bug.
When I boot the netinst-cd and use the `expert`-argument to do a fully
customised installation, the installation fails at
reassign 432314 lilo-installer 1.20
thanks
On Monday 09 July 2007 13:12, Youssef Eldakar wrote:
Installing on a machine with 4 SATA disks proceeds smoothly until it
reaches the LILO boot loader installation.
First of all a little side note. lilo is pretty much deprecated (grub is
preferred
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 432314 lilo-installer 1.20
Bug#432314: installation-report: LILO Installation Fails on Machine with 4 SATA
Disks
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lilo-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.21-2-ixp4xx-di_1.16_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.21-2-ixp4xx-di_1.16_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-footbridge-di_1.16_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-footbridge-di_1.16_arm.udeb
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.21-2-ixp4xx-di_1.15_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.21-2-ixp4xx-di_1.15_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-footbridge-di_1.15_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.21-2-footbridge-di_1.15_arm.udeb
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 08:14, Youssef Eldakar wrote:
The issue is similar to bug #380416, I suppose.
Hmm. If you also have messages similar to the following in the syslog,
that could indeed be the case:
main-menu[2214]: (process:1635): sfdisk:
main-menu[2214]: (process:1635): cannot open
--- Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udeb_{include,exclude} is meant to be used to instruct d-i to load or
not something by default but d-i also loads a lot of modules that
are standard or required.
You can to change the set of d-i modules that're included on the CD
changing the
Hi,
First of all, I would like to apologize for falling out of the loop
for almost 4 months. My move and settling-in period took quite a
bit longer than I expected. In the meantime there was no further
progress on the decision about continued sparc32 support, so I would
like to address it as
Hi all,
As you may or may not know, VMWare has kindly donated some licences for
VMWare Workstation to the D-I team, to be used for development and
testing of the installer.
We currently need an upgrade of these licences from version 5 to version
6, mainly because version 5 does not work
On Saturday 14 July 2007 20:15, Robert Millan wrote:
- we already have parted-udeb, which I expect _does_ support GPT
In my use case, the person who was installing had to call me because he
had to edit a GPT disk and didn't know how to handle parted. With my
proposed solution, I would have
37 matches
Mail list logo
