On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:33:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2007 09:44, Robert Millan wrote: > > Ok, but please let's not make a big fuss of this. The udebs were just > > added to the archive, not to D-I. > > And you also added them to all CD images...
Doesn't "extra" priority move packages to the last CDs when applied to udebs? > > And I requested it out of ignorance, not malice > > I'm sorry if this seems like making a big fuss to you, but this is about > the third or fourth time this happened in the past year or so, so this is > not just targeted at you. Ok. I understand that I might have inadvertedly touched a sensible area. Please excuse my unawareness about the situation. I'll try to be more careful with anything that is somehow related to D-I. (Besides, perhaps it would make sense to look for mechanisms in which this could be prevented, such as having a centralised list of D-I team approved udebs that lintian checks, or so) -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
