Processed: found 409412 in 0.132

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1 found 409412 0.132 Bug#409412: g-i: RTL text changes place under the progress bar Bug marked as found in version 0.132. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#492331: installation-report: a few glitches

2008-07-25 Thread Paul Slootman
Package: installation-report Version: 2.35 Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: Boot method: network Image version: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz 20080522 Date: 2008-07-24 Machine: Intel DG33FB motherboard,

Bug#491376: recipe for BIOS-based boot on gpt

2008-07-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:08:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Ok, so here are two patches. One of them using recipes-x86, and the other simply modifiing recipes. The first one expects recipes-x86 has been created previously via svn copy. So is either of these okay? -- Robert Millan

more upx problems

2008-07-25 Thread Joey Hess
The hd-media image no longer boots on my main test box (HP thin client). Immediate reboot after syslinux finishes loading the initrd and kernel. Netboot still works ok. I turned off upx, and that fixed the issue. And yeah, we're upxing this image too, it's built by the same code path that builds

Processing of kernel-wedge_2.47_i386.changes

2008-07-25 Thread Archive Administrator
kernel-wedge_2.47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-wedge_2.47.dsc kernel-wedge_2.47.tar.gz kernel-wedge_2.47_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

kernel-wedge_2.47_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: kernel-wedge_2.47.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.47.dsc kernel-wedge_2.47.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.47.tar.gz kernel-wedge_2.47_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.47_all.deb Override entries for your package:

Processing of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.65_i386.changes

2008-07-25 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.65.dsc linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.65.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.25-2-486-di_1.65_i386.udeb nic-modules-2.6.25-2-486-di_1.65_i386.udeb

Bug#490562: marked as done (installation-report: hd-image couldn't mount partition)

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:32:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#490562: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.47 has caused the Debian Bug report #490562, regarding installation-report: hd-image couldn't mount partition to be marked as done. This means that you claim

linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.65_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: acpi-modules-2.6.25-2-486-di_1.65_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.25-2-486-di_1.65_i386.udeb acpi-modules-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem-di_1.65_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem-di_1.65_i386.udeb

massbuild needed

2008-07-25 Thread Joey Hess
I'm uploading kernel-wedge 2.47 and linux-kernel-di-i386 to fix bug #490562. Can someone please massbuild for all other arches? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Is it possible to create several LV on a VG with different names using partman ?

2008-07-25 Thread Grégory Oestreicher
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 11:05, Jérémy Bobbio a écrit : Try passing -std-vga, as I think vesamenu might be the issue. Another more twisted way to workaround graphic card issues: [cut] Thanks for the hints, but that didn't help. I can see the boot menu, but after choosing a simple install it

Bug#486298: Megaraid works, but it looks like it's because of a kernel change

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Dickinson
Hi Frans, Sorry for not getting back to you sooner; my internet has been down for a while and won't be back until at least Wednesday. I tested the second image you posted and I had an install with no problems, however when I did wait=10 it also worked, and when I checked the syslog there

Processing of hw-detect_1.65_i386.changes

2008-07-25 Thread Archive Administrator
hw-detect_1.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hw-detect_1.65.dsc hw-detect_1.65.tar.gz ethdetect_1.65_all.udeb disk-detect_1.65_all.udeb hw-detect_1.65_i386.udeb archdetect_1.65_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To

hw-detect_1.65_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: archdetect_1.65_i386.udeb to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.65_i386.udeb disk-detect_1.65_all.udeb to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.65_all.udeb ethdetect_1.65_all.udeb to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.65_all.udeb hw-detect_1.65.dsc to

Bug#491712: marked as done (firmware for iwl4965 is asked in disk-detect)

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#491712: fixed in hw-detect 1.65 has caused the Debian Bug report #491712, regarding firmware for iwl4965 is asked in disk-detect to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#486298: marked as done (Needs delay loop to allow for megaraid_mbox initialization)

2008-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#486298: fixed in hw-detect 1.65 has caused the Debian Bug report #486298, regarding Needs delay loop to allow for megaraid_mbox initialization to be marked as done. This means that you claim

unblocking partman-multipath

2008-07-25 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, please unblock partman-multipath. There's no version in lenny yet. This way folks building custom installers (due to #440675) can pull from lenny instead of sid. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]