Dear Customer,
Thank you for contacting us at Walmart.com.
The email address you just contacted is not monitored, as we are unable
to personally respond to messages sent to that address. Please do not reply to
this email; instead, please resend your message to one of the following:
To
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.36
Severity: minor
When (re)configuring console-setup (at least with the non-GUI method of
(re)configuring), there is no text prior to the list of keyboard models,
so the user is left to guess whether the question is about keyboard types,
video cards, or what.
Sp
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what hp(hil) is for,
> It's in xkb/keycodes/hp.
I meant I have no idea in what cases hp(hil) is used. From some HOWTOs
I can guess that the usual keycodes can be used even when HIL interface
is used for the key
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> priority 524233 minor
Bug#524233: console-setup should conflict with console-data
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> priority 524239 minor
Bug#524239: console-setup should conflict with console-tools
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 524233 pending
Bug#524233: console-setup should conflict with console-data
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 524239 pending
Bug#524239: console-setup should conflict with console-tools
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pen
Anton Zinoviev, le Tue 02 Jun 2009 23:47:55 +0300, a écrit :
> > I also notice in kbd-chooser the mention of hil, which is available in
> > xkb-data as hp(hil), maybe a console-setup-hp-ekmap package should be
> > added, providing it?
>
> I have no idea what hp(hil) is for,
It's in xkb/keycodes
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> I miss this functionality, and I don't think we should ditch it because
> it's very handy (just doing a couple adjustments in a keymap, eg. for
> keybindings). I also found no documentation in console-setup about how
> to achive so
[Adding a CC to debian-h...@lists.debian.org]
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Package: console-setup
> Version: 1.36
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> First, I see in config.proto that models are explicited for all Debian
> archs but hppa. From kbd-chooser it
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:45:29AM +0200, Anders Lagerås wrote:
>
> I don't get the å ä ö charachters as I used to, instead
> som some strange charachters and two charachters for each time pressing a key.
Thanks for you report. Can you answer the following questions:
1. What symbols do you see i
Il giorno lun, 01/06/2009 alle 15.35 +0200, Christian Perrier ha
scritto:
> One of the release goals of Debian Installer for squeeze is dropping
> the use of console-data keyboard mappings, to replace them by
> console-setup [1].
...
> Please just don't pay too much attention to possibly untranslat
* Stefano Canepa [2009-06-02 18:58]:
> Looks without ext4 support
colo (mipsel) is probably missing from that list.
> * delo: mipsel
delo is not used in d-i anymore (the devices supported by delo are no
longer supported by d-i or the Debian kernel).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.co
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.10.2-2
`busybox grep' crashes with a segmentation fault, on both ppc32 and ppc64:
| # busybox grep
| Segmentation fault
| #
Backtrace (on ppc64):
| # gdb -args busybox grep
| GNU gdb 6.8-debian
| Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
| License G
Hi all,
I continued my research about ext4 support in bootloaders and this is
the result till now:
ext4 support
* grub: amd64, i386, powerpc w/ ubuntu patch
* grub2: amd64, i386, powerpc
* lilo-installer: amd64 i386
Looks without ext4 support
* aboot: alpha
* yaboot:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, nabet...@caldron.jp wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:44:24 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
> > As you may already have noticed, I reverted [1] the part of your last
> > commit that activated generating a PDF variant for Japanese.
>
> I'm sorry.
> My changes as last committed included
Hi Frans,
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:44:24 +0200
Frans Pop wrote:
> As you may already have noticed, I reverted [1] the part of your last
> commit that activated generating a PDF variant for Japanese.
I'm sorry.
My changes as last committed included mistakes.
I didn't mean to commit those two file
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.13.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch karmic
Since the rest of the installer is moving to UUIDs by default, busybox
mkswap needs to generate swap areas containing UUIDs in order that they
can be
Accepted:
base-installer_1.100.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.100.dsc
base-installer_1.100.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.100.tar.gz
base-installer_1.100_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.100_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.100_i386.
base-installer_1.100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.100.dsc
base-installer_1.100.tar.gz
base-installer_1.100_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.100_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bo
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#530904: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #530904,
regarding calls udevinfo which no longer exists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#368294: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #368294,
regarding debian-installer: "go back" "continue" are the same if ROOT(/) not
selected
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #225802,
regarding disk device names not persistant from install to target system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #225802,
regarding disk device names not persistant from install to target system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #225802,
regarding should use labels for all partitions in fstab
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #225802,
regarding disk device names not persistant from install to target system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#225802: fixed in partman-target 60
has caused the Debian Bug report #225802,
regarding SCSI device renaming breaks install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Accepted:
partman-target_60.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_60.dsc
partman-target_60.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_60.tar.gz
partman-target_60_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_60_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman
partman-target_60_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_60.dsc
partman-target_60.tar.gz
partman-target_60_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.69.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.69.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.69.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.69.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.69_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-ut
debian-installer-utils_1.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.69.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.69.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.69_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.69_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.69_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.69_al
Joaquin Manuel, le Tue 02 Jun 2009 11:24:23 +0200, a écrit :
> Hi, It's possible to change Debian Text Intallation colours?
>
> We have extracted initrd but can't find anything related to menu colours.
It's in the cdebconf package in
src/modules/frontend/newt/newt.c
See newtAltColorPalette, sel
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Joaquin Manuel wrote:
> Hi, It's possible to change Debian Text Intallation colours?
>
> We have extracted initrd but can't find anything related to menu
> colours.
For the newt (textual) frontend they are compiled into the cdebconf
program (see src/modules/frontend/newt/
Hi, It's possible to change Debian Text Intallation colours?
We have extracted initrd but can't find anything related to menu colours.
Thanks
--
Joaquín Manuel Llano Montero
Linux Registered User #481540
* Peter Eisentraut [20090602 08:34]:
> $ sudo debootstrap sid foo http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
> I: Retrieving Release
> I: Retrieving Packages
> I: Validating Packages
> I: Resolving dependencies of required packages...
> I: Resolving dependencies of base packages...
>
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > I disagree with you; while I agree that d-i.alioth.d.o exists for
> > ages I do believe d-i.debian.org is much nicer for documents and
> > easier to remember for users. So I see no big issue to use
Hi,
On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I disagree with you; while I agree that d-i.alioth.d.o exists for ages
> I do believe d-i.debian.org is much nicer for documents and easier to
> remember for users. So I see no big issue to use it.
yet more looking for the right ressource f
35 matches
Mail list logo
