Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
Add the mount option 'discard' for ext4 filesystems so, during
partitioning, TRIM can be activated for SSDs in the installed
system.
I had the impression that there was going to be some sort of automatic
detection in the kernel of appropriate devices and that trim
Neil Williams wrote:
Emdebian doesn't include manpages and some packages (and some udebs
apparently) don't expect this directory to not exist.
I'd be very surprised if any udebs know anything at all about
/usr/share/man.
However, there are numerous postinsts, starting with bash, that run
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 663484 choose-mirror
Bug #663484 [debian-installer] debian-installer: a broken testing link on the
server prevents installation
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'choose-mirror'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
In addition to that, it would also be nice if the -E discard
option is passed to mkfs.ext4, so that it TRIMs the entire disk
partition prior to creating the file system structures.
-E discard is the default, according to mkfs.ext4(8)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
On 03/12/2012 07:51 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
In addition to that, it would also be nice if the -E discard
option is passed to mkfs.ext4, so that it TRIMs the entire disk
partition prior to creating the file system structures.
-E discard is the default, according to
On 03/12/2012 07:58 AM, Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
On 03/12/2012 07:51 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
In addition to that, it would also be nice if the -E discard
option is passed to mkfs.ext4, so that it TRIMs the entire disk
partition prior to creating the file system
Hi,
On 12-03-2012 04:55, Joey Hess wrote:
I had the impression that there was going to be some sort of automatic
detection in the kernel of appropriate devices and that trim would be
automatically enabled for them. Is it not going to play out that way?
Just adds the mount option to partman.
On 12.03.2012 08:57, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.49
os-prober finds some MSDOS partition on my laptop:
[os-prober says /dev/sda2 is MSDOS,
while parted and blkid identifies it as ext4]
I understand that, due to the fact that other utils correctly identifies
this
Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
On 12-03-2012 04:55, Joey Hess wrote:
I had the impression that there was going to be some sort of automatic
detection in the kernel of appropriate devices and that trim would be
automatically enabled for them. Is it not going to play out that way?
Just adds the
Floris Bos / Maxnet wrote:
Hmm, and to make things more complicated.
The RELEASE-NOTES that come with the e2fsprogs source say that the
default is what you put in mke2fs.conf
That's for an older version.
int discard = 1;/* attempt to discard device before fs creation */
Michael Tokarev wrote:
So a more naive approach at determining the filesystem type is to
check first 512 bytes, and if MS-DOS signature is found there,
report that it is MS-DOS. This is, apparently, what os-prober is
currently doing.
os-prober does not look at fragile magic numbers in
Joey Hess, le Mon 12 Mar 2012 11:14:07 -0400, a écrit :
The particular OS string we see here comes from:
# MS-DOS
if [ -z $found ] item_in_dir -q dos $2
[ -d $2/$(item_in_dir dos $2) ]; then
long=MS-DOS 5.x/6.x/Win3.1
short=MS-DOS
found=true
fi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:14:07AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
These checks don't try to avoid false positives like a /dos or /windows,
because the code earlier checks that the mounted filesystem is one of ntfs,
vfat, or msdos. To which list was semi-recently added fuse, and I suspect
that might
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.49
Severity: normal
A while ago, os-prober was made to try to mount filesystems with
grub-mount. This means that $type cannot be used to test
the filesystem type. Various commits have been made since
to let through $type=fuse|fuseblk in various tests.
But, I've
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mmm, why not looking for io.sys at the root? In all the versions of DOS
that I know there has to be one for the partition to be bootable.
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IO.SYS , some of the DOS
clones did not use io.sys, which may be why I don't remember it
Colin Watson wrote:
How about, if grub-mount is used, we use grub-probe to find out which
GRUB filesystem driver is in use, and stash that somewhere so that
individual tests can get at it? That ought to be just as reliable as
the existing OS filesystem type checks.
Yes please. I've CCed the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:04:52AM +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
Hi all,
Add the mount option 'discard' for ext4 filesystems so, during
partitioning, TRIM can be activated for SSDs in the installed
system.
I enabled that on ext4 on my SSD, and had two lockups in 24 hours.
No lockups since
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 14:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer:
Thanks for this.
* until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
* until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded
* on 03/17 try to get the
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:47:19 +
with message-id e1s7bdd-0004lx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#537535: fixed in cdebconf 0.159
has caused the Debian Bug report #537535,
regarding other missing utilities for debconf replacement
to be marked as done.
This means that you
cdebconf_0.159_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.159.dsc
cdebconf_0.159.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.159_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.159_amd64.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.159_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.159_amd64.deb
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.159_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.159_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.159_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.159_amd64.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.159_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.159_amd64.udeb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cdebconf-gtk_0.159_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database,
Hi Adam,
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 19:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 14:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer:
Thanks for this.
* until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
*
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Mar 12 21:25 debian-cd@pettersson 1sidamd64
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1sidamd64
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Mar 12 21:25 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidamd64
24 matches
Mail list logo
