On 05.02.2013 23:55, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
(05/02/2013):
or:
* apply the following tested and working patch from #699742 in
debian-installer, […]
Except that this “tested and working
On 08/13/2012 01:17 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
At work, we're using mainly supermicro servers, and they have support in
the BIOS for Intel Matrix raid (imsm), which is a form of
sataraid/fakeraid.
[...]
I now have a version of the wheezy installer that succesfully installs
and boots
(Keep me on CC, I'm not on debian-boot)
Hello,
I just debugged an issue where live-installer would not work when
you opted for an Italian installation. The commit below has my explanation
of the problem and a tested fix. That said I'm not very familiar with
the internals of main-menu and this
On 02/05/2013 09:33 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
I tried this patch against cc123e0 from debian-installer git.
Unfortunately the problem is still the same.
indeed; only the first part of the patch was attached; here's the
complete one.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3,
On 02/06/2013 12:55 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer
version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide
to require some fix to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?]
jftr, i never did nor intended to ask for having
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:47:37 +
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
Please don't apply it just yet--we'll presumably need to get
approval from the release team to change this in initscripts
at the same time. I'll have a patch for initscripts shortly;
might be a bit later in the week to
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:59:04PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:47:37 +
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
Please don't apply it just yet--we'll presumably need to get
approval from the release team to change this in initscripts
at the same time. I'll
Hi,
On 06.02.2013 16:36, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/05/2013 09:33 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
I tried this patch against cc123e0 from debian-installer git.
Unfortunately the problem is still the same.
indeed; only the first part of the patch was attached; here's the
complete one.
I can
On 02/06/2013 10:38 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:55 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer
version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide
to require some fix to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?]
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:38:08PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
ca
catalan hasn't receive any updates since the release of Squeeze /
AND catalan is an xml based translation, what means that the translation
stays
the same even if there are changings in en!
52 files are not
--Questo è un Messaggio di Posta Certificata--
Il giorno 06/02/2013 alle ore 19:42:30 (+0100) il messaggio con Oggetto
Fwd: Photos è stato inviato dal mittente marco.salom...@pec.it
e indirizzato a:
debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Il messaggio originale è incluso in allegato, per aprirlo cliccare
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
- the latest of these uploads breaks the installer, making it
impossible to build and upload the planned wheezy release
candidate, since build-dependencies are fetched from unstable
- when asked to revert this change, the syslinux maintainer
Hi,
Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:38:08PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
ca
catalan hasn't receive any updates since the release of Squeeze /
AND catalan is an xml based translation, what means that the translation
stays
the same even if
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Assuming that the patch for #699742[0] fixes this issue with DI RC
releases being installed, is there still an outstanding issue for the
CTTE?
Earlier in this thread, there had been a couple of reports that fix didn't
work. I haven't looked further,
On 06.02.2013 17:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi,
On 06.02.2013 16:36, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/05/2013 09:33 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
I tried this patch against cc123e0 from debian-installer git.
Unfortunately the problem is still the same.
indeed; only the first part of the patch was
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Assuming that the patch for #699742[0] fixes this issue with DI RC
releases being installed, is there still an outstanding issue for the
CTTE?
Earlier in this thread, there had been a couple of reports that
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
In practice, at least for the last couple of release cycles, we freeze
unstable for non-leaf packages during the release freeze because otherwise
it's too difficult with our current infrastructure to finish the
release.
I personally consider this a
Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com writes:
I personally consider this a regrettable situation, and hope that for
jessie and beyond we can work out how to do this better. It is
unacceptable to me to freeze anything in sid for more than a week or
two at a time. Holding d-i's build dependencies static
On 06.02.2013 23:22, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Assuming that the patch for #699742[0] fixes this issue with DI RC
releases being installed, is there still an outstanding issue for the
CTTE?
Earlier in this thread,
Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com (06/02/2013):
I personally consider this a regrettable situation, and hope that for
jessie and beyond we can work out how to do this better. It is
unacceptable to me to freeze anything in sid for more than a week or
two at a time. Holding d-i's build dependencies
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com (06/02/2013):
I personally consider this a regrettable situation, and hope that for
jessie and beyond we can work out how to do this better. It is
unacceptable to me to freeze anything in sid for more than a week or
two at a
Hello!
Last summer, I was hoping to add ZFS support to the Debian installer. After
playing around with partman a week or two, I ended up developing an entirely
new application, growlight [0]. It is currently used in the SprezzOS
installer [1], and has been used by a small, ZoL-intensive user base
Quoting nick black (nick.bl...@sprezzatech.com):
Hello!
Last summer, I was hoping to add ZFS support to the Debian installer. After
playing around with partman a week or two, I ended up developing an entirely
new application, growlight [0]. It is currently used in the SprezzOS
installer
On 02/06/2013 11:48 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unfortunately the second patch doesn't work either. See [1].
that is incorrect; the patch works, it's just the old vbox version in
current debian testing/sid which has a bug (try the image on real
hardware or any other virtualization and it
07.02.2013 10:30, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/06/2013 11:48 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unfortunately the second patch doesn't work either. See [1].
that is incorrect; the patch works, it's just the old vbox version in current
debian testing/sid which has a bug (try the image on real hardware
On 07.02.2013 07:30, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/06/2013 11:48 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unfortunately the second patch doesn't work either. See [1].
that is incorrect; the patch works, it's just the old vbox version in
current debian testing/sid which has a bug (try the image on real
On 02/07/2013 07:35 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This makes me wonder what other components are also buggy somehow and
needs to be updated?
first, this is a specific bug in vbox that was fixed some time ago but
didn't make it into debian yet (because it lags a significant amount of
upstream
On 02/07/2013 07:45 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Well, VBOX is pretty popular, so shipping an installer which doesn't
work for such an environment is certainly a no-go.
again, the syslinux in sid would not be in wheezy. making it a
*temporary* problem until vbox has been fixed in debian (which
On 07.02.2013 07:58, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/07/2013 07:45 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Well, VBOX is pretty popular, so shipping an installer which doesn't
work for such an environment is certainly a no-go.
again, the syslinux in sid would not be in wheezy. making it a
*temporary* problem
On 02/07/2013 07:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
I think it is obvious by now that reverting to syslinux 4 from wheezy is
the only sensible way forward at this point in the release.
'obvious'?
it requires two straight forward things, that, again, as said, are
required to be applied for jessie
sorry, forgot to put in the links to the patches..
On 02/07/2013 08:06 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
* patch applied against debian-installer to include the additionally
required .c32 modules when using vesamenu.c32
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699742#30
* patch
On 07.02.2013 08:06, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 02/07/2013 07:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
I think it is obvious by now that reverting to syslinux 4 from wheezy is
the only sensible way forward at this point in the release.
'obvious'?
Imho, yes. But then, it's not up to me to decide.
*
On 02/07/2013 08:12 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
This list is getting longer with each email. Seeing that syslinux 5 has
been in sid for less then 10 days, I'm worried what other issues might
show up.
apart from the two obvious things (debian-installer and debian-cd) that
do need to be updated to
33 matches
Mail list logo
