Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2014-12-01):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
unblock brltty/5.2~20141018-3
unblock espeakup/1:0.71-19
Hello,
As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 09:41:20 +0100, a écrit :
As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by default, I
would like to upload the attached changes. The idea is that the most
accessible desktop we have in Debian is MATE
Why are we learning about this only now?
On Montag, 1. Dezember 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-accessibil...@lists.debian.org
I then guess bts only keep the last one.
seperating them with commas on the same line works.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2014-12-01):
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 09:41:20 +0100, a écrit :
As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by default, I
would like to upload the attached changes. The idea is that the most
accessible desktop we have in Debian
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 10:39:17 +0100, a écrit :
With the tasksel/3.25 upload and the default switch back to gnome, it
looked to me that the accessibility side was taken care of.
What do you mean by taken care of?
If you mean fixing them, the few accessibility issues that
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2014-12-01):
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 10:39:17 +0100, a écrit :
With the tasksel/3.25 upload and the default switch back to gnome, it
looked to me that the accessibility side was taken care of.
What do you mean by taken care of?
If you
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 11:36:06 +0100, a écrit :
It seemed clear to me, except that since at the time the poll was done
MATE was actually not among the choices in the evaluation chart (and not
even a task), Jean-Philippe made it a special case.
!!
“[…] I think Debian won't
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 11:36:06 +0100, a écrit :
Well, I don't remember an announcement about it. I didn't know that
the choice had been actually really settled,[...]
Well, you could have asked;
Well, that's what I am doing. I guess my timeout value was just too
large.
which seems to enact that gnome is fine enough.
Yes, again, gnome *is* fine enough. But can't we fine-tune the default
when we know for sure that the user is using braille? Notably since it
seems we'd better go with gnome with its integrated magnifier for people
with low vision, and
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
braille, speech and magnifying, in particular due to its visual customization
capabilities, disappeared in gnome.
Mmm, but do we have magnification
- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org a écrit :
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
braille, speech and magnifying, in particular due to its visual
customization capabilities,
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 13:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org a écrit :
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
braille, speech and
- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org a écrit :
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 13:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org a écrit :
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
and MATE is much more suit when we try to have
Control: severity 767037 serious
Control: tag 767037 +patch
[ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
the problems here recently. ]
Hi folks,
i have two patches attached here, one for grub and one for
grub-installer. They implement the logic I described below and
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-12-01):
Control: severity 767037 serious
Control: tag 767037 +patch
[ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
the problems here recently. ]
Hi folks,
i have two patches attached here, one for grub and one for
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:52:51PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-12-01):
Control: severity 767037 serious
Control: tag 767037 +patch
[ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
the problems here recently. ]
Hi folks,
i
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-12-01):
Hmmm, you're right. There's some existing inconsistencies already,
which don't help. In various places we already use EFI (e.g. in the
GRUB package names, EFI System Partition etc.) but in others it's
UEFI. Maybe we'd be better with just EFI
So, can someone please tell me what's wrong with
this unblock request?
I can try to fix built-using generation adding gcc
to the mix but I'm afraid to do that this late in
the release cycle, especially after it required so
many iterations to get the most important in this
context part of
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-12-01):
So, can someone please tell me what's wrong with this unblock request?
I did write in my first reply:
“At this stage, I'd rather see the security fix only.”
I can try to fix built-using generation adding gcc to the mix but I'm
afraid to do that
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.66
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
Could you please add support for the Tanglu[1] Debian derivative?
This includes three suites at time:
* Aequorea
* Bartholomea
* Chromodoris
I have a patch attached which adds Tanglu support.
I also attched a second patch
Matthias Klumpp m...@debian.org (2014-12-01):
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.66
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
Could you please add support for the Tanglu[1] Debian derivative?
This includes three suites at time:
* Aequorea
* Bartholomea
* Chromodoris
I have a patch attached
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Dear maintainers,
Please provide a method to allow the installer to ignore the 'Valid-Until'
field for repositories during install. Currently, one can tell Apt/Aptitude
directly to do this via:
# apt-get -o
Subject: installation-reports: Needs a /vmlinuz file that points to boot image?
Package: installation-reports
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrade from stable(Wheezy) to testing(Jessie) (via modifying
/etc/apt/sources.list to say Jessie instead of Stable or Wheezy), the machine
wouldn't boot. (grub
23 matches
Mail list logo
