Bug#1016957: remove kbd-chooser from the archive?

2024-05-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Paul Gevers (2024-05-04): > If you're sure it's not used, I can work around udd and have it at least > removed from testing. I think a bug retitle (or separate bug) would have > been better. The current bug isn't RC. If it's certain that package isn't used/useful anymore, the correct thing to do

Bug#1016957: remove kbd-chooser from the archive?

2024-05-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi On 04-05-2024 3:36 p.m., Holger Wansing wrote: I think Bastian's approach is, to remove kbd-chooser from the archive, since it was stated (see below) that it's no longer in use. It might be that udd assumes all packages that build a udeb are used. d-i has switched away from it to

Bug#1016957: remove kbd-chooser from the archive?

2024-05-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Paul Gevers wrote (Sat, 4 May 2024 07:46:45 +0200): > Hi Bastian, > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > > Control: severity -1 serious > > Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug > report. I think Bastian's approach is, to remove

Bug#1043226: marked as done (debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text)

2024-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 4 May 2024 15:16:05 +0200 with message-id <20240504151605.fac9949d94d21c59de696...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1043226: debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text has caused the Debian Bug report #1043226, regarding

Re: Bug#1043226: debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text

2024-05-04 Thread Holger Wansing
With latest user-setup upload 1.97, this has been dealed with, so closing. -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Processing of grub-installer_1.201_source.changes

2024-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
grub-installer_1.201_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_1.201.dsc grub-installer_1.201.tar.xz grub-installer_1.201_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1059991: marked as done (grub-installer: build loong64.udeb for loongarch64)

2024-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 May 2024 11:49:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1059991: fixed in grub-installer 1.201 has caused the Debian Bug report #1059991, regarding grub-installer: build loong64.udeb for loongarch64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

grub-installer_1.201_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2024-05-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 12:42:44 +0200 Source: grub-installer Architecture: source Version: 1.201 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Re: Reword non-free-firmware description

2024-05-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Wed, 1 May 2024 17:02:10 +0200): > What to do about this MR regarding rewording of (non-free) firmware > description ? > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/-/merge_requests/15 > > Should something be done there? Any objections against applying this,

Processed: reset severity

2024-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1016957 wishlist Bug #1016957 [src:kbd-chooser] kbd-chooser: please add support for riscv64 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1016957: