Re: Bug#673839: Building an udeb binary

it's your call at the end Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbb6dae.9080...@ubuntu.com

Re: Bug#673839: Building an udeb binary

Le 21/05/2012 21:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : That means more udebs, more stuff in the d-i image/initramfs. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. Quite the contrary, in fact. It looks to me like a separate build is better as far as d-i is concerned. How costy would those udeb be? Those are

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

and a random 2.9 snapshot is not something we are wanting to ship with a stable Debian Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

2.9 variant building only the .udebs to unstable neither Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 10:23 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : Ok, but if someone else would be packaging those to produce .udebs, you have no particular objection to uploading .debs to experimental at the same time ? Are you saying you want to hijack GTK now? Sebastien Bacher

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

really need the new version for etch? Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

, then would you like to assist us in this work ? (as we don't have gtk and general library packaging experience) Sure, feel free to mail the debian-gtk-gnome list about any issue you have on the topic Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#256905: well

I'll try to download/test a new iso tomorrow with an another box and let you know. Cheers, Sebastien Bacher

Bug#256905: installation-reports: can't mount the CD after hardware detection

for details on the box), d-i beta4 used to work. Let me know if you need some extra informations. Thanks, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: INSTALL REPORT - Gnome does NOT! load

at all. It should be fixed soon. (This bug is already reported as #218549) Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#225583: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-30): libacl1 error

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-12-30 (11:01) Severity: normal Tags: d-i (Same config as in #220014). Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard

Bug#225333: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-28): deboostrap error ...

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-12-28 Severity: normal Tags: d-i (Same config as in #220014). Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives:

Bug#218610: partconf: Skipping to the next partition in the list would be better

Package: partconf Version: netinst iso 2003-10-31 Severity: normal Tags: d-i During the partitions configuration, a list or partitions is displayed : - part1 - part2 - part3 A think a standard behaviour is to set the first partition in the list, then the second, ... but after a partition

Bug#218606: debian-installer: debootstrap error during the install

Package: debian-installer Version: netinst from 2003-10-31 Severity: important Tags: d-i The install with a netinst iso from 2003-10-31 just failed on a deboostrap error: $ cat /target/var/log/debootstrap.log ln: /target/usr/bin/awk: File exists I've not formatted the partition during the

Bug#218735: lilo-installer: It would be nice to have some comments in the lilo.conf file

Package: lilo-installer Version: netinst iso 2003-10-31 Severity: wishlist Tags: d-i After an install, I've this lilo.conf : boot=/dev/hda root=/dev/hdc3 install=/boot/boot.b map=/boot/map image=/vmlinuz label=Linux initrd=/initrd.img --- It works, but having more comments

Bug#218765: partconf: swap is mounted as /

Package: partconf Version: netinst 2003-11-01 iso Severity: normal Tags: d-i During the partitions configuration, if you select a swap partition, hit enter, and choice to not modify the filesystem the installer return to the partitions list with / as mountpoint (but without displaying any

Bug#212771: netcfg should allow to use back button

Package: netcfg Version: 0.24 Severity: wishlist During a sarge install ((sarge netinst iso (2003-09-25)), the network setup the interface installation) has a back button, be there is no way to select it. You should remove this button or activate it. Cheers, Sebastien Bacher

Bug#212783: base-config: Some lines are too large for the screen

Package: base-config Version: 1.72 Severity: normal Tags: d-i After rebooting from a sarge netinstall with french locales some lines on base config are too large for the screen (in the tasksel, ... selection). The result is that all the lines beginning are missing (to show the end of longer